The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete As per nom. The only articles I could find on google largely were niche coverage of various drama incidents, most of which appear heavily sensationalized. Likewise, the vast majority of the article is written about controversies involving Dellor which are largely not significant. Two of the sources are primary, one coming from Dellor's own YouTube channel and a tweet he made; one source is heavily sensationalized; and one source does provide a neutral coverage of his termination, but at only one paragraph is far from a sufficient source for demonstrating
WP:SIGCOV.
ArkHyena (
talk) 18:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, fails
WP:GNG,
WP:BIO. Note: I removed a lot of this article as a flagrant
WP:BLP violation, sourcing purely negative information to GNL Magazine, a questionable source listed nowhere, social media posts, and completely unsourced for the "Allegations and Troubles" section. ~
A412talk! 19:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Not enough coverage to establish notability. This
[1], but it's a rather small article.
[2], celebrity article, describing getting eggs thrown at his house. Hardly the stuff we'd use for notability. Appears to have said some things that were not well received, career ended after.
Oaktree b (
talk) 23:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
BBC article
[3] about him quitting. That's about the extent of coverage in RS; "spirited" individual, livery character, but not enough for notability.
Oaktree b (
talk) 23:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.