From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Websites. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Websites|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions ( prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Websites.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Suggested inclusion guidelines for this topic area can be found at WP:WEB.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch


Websites

Fashion Central

Fashion Central (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is clearly PROMO, created by a now blocked sock puppet. It hasn't received sig/ in-depth coverage in RS, aside from some churnalism or paid coverage. Furthermore, it is not even a magazine as the article claims, but rather a boutique or maybe some e-commerce store. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 12:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Lefaucheux Museum

Lefaucheux Museum (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There doesn't appear to be any coverage in reliable sources. toweli ( talk) 06:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete, although some speedy deletion criteria may apply given the article has clearly been written by the owner: https://forum.cartridgecollectors.org/t/so-i-founded-a-museum/59999 Traumnovelle ( talk) 06:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Albanian Wikipedia

AfDs for this article:
Albanian Wikipedia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG 48JCL TALK 14:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. 48JCL TALK 14:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. The nomination is not satisfactory. One English word plus one abbreviation - when the article is being nominated for the third time, you have to follow up on the last discussions and delve into the arguments. You should also explain why the sources already in the articles do not count towards GNG. Geschichte ( talk) 14:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Okay, the previous nominations were literally about how it’s a wikimedia project so it shouldn’t count. Also, the sources are not properly formatted, and hasn’t received that much outside attention other than in Albania. Sources are old, and article is somewhat hard to navigate. 48JCL TALK 01:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Cites Wikipedia as a source. ( List of Wikipedias) 48JCL TALK 01:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Topics only need attention in one country to be notable. Citing Wikipedia as a source is not a reason for deletion, neither is the age or the formatting of the sources, and especially not how it navigates. Geschichte ( talk) 20:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep since the nomination and the subsequent elaboration has nothing to do with policy. Geschichte ( talk) 20:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Ed Craven

Ed Craven (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is more about the companies he founded which already have their own articles. His life doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 00:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Websites, and Australia. LibStar ( talk) 00:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Yes the article needs to be rewritten but the subject still meets GNG ( [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]). GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Given that it has been repeatedly confirmed at DRV sources presented during an afd should be ignored and this article should be purely judged on it's current state and should be deleted, unless of course the closing admin chooses to guess what a select few voters just might have possibly been thinking then they can choose to supervote based on their imagination. Don't bother making an effort. Your sources will be ignored. duffbeerforme ( talk) 15:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Target of article is notable enough for inclusion. Sources per GMH Melb's comment above. Triplefour ( talk) 07:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Continenttimes.com

Continenttimes.com (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Also see WP:NPERIODICAL. Further noting that this was previously deleted under a different name, see Contínent Times (digital newspaper). B3251 ( talk) 04:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Website Proposed deletions

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Websites&oldid=1227357953"