This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Philippines. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
-
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Philippines|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few
scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Philippines. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{
transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{
prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to
Asia.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
-
2017 Tanay bus accident (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
Wikipedia:Notability (events). No evidence of lasting effects based on GNews Archives and GBooks search. GNews shows a temporary ban on field trips which lasted
merely six months. A brief and cited mention is already at
List_of_traffic_collisions_(2000–present)#2017 so a redirect ther can be an
alternative to deletion. I've also added the reference mentioned above as a citation in said entry.
Lenticel (
talk) 09:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 09:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep this well-developed article as a legitimate SPINOFF that passes EVENT. Just 7 years have passed since this accident in which 50 people died. Societal impact beyond the event was acknowledged by nom. Deleting this article will further increase the disparity between the accidents that are being kept and delete for developed countries versus developing countries.
gidonb (
talk) 10:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
2017 Nueva Ecija bus accident (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
Wikipedia:Notability (events). No evidence of lasting effects based on GNews Archives and GBooks search. A brief and cited mention is already at
List_of_traffic_collisions_(2000–present)#2017 so a redirect ther can be an
alternative to deletion.
Lenticel (
talk) 09:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Judith Cajes (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
The article does not pass
WP:POLITICIAN and
WP:GNG
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 13:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete the only sources I can find are related to her slapping someone and COVID lockdowns, which aren't good enough for
WP:GNG. Mayor doesn't pass
WP:POLITICIAN. Generally a very minor politician with no major record to speak of. Possible redirect to
Roberto Cajes, her husband —
Iadmc
♫
talk 13:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I dont think the redirect is possible, the redirect does not contain even a sentence of Judith Cajes.
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 13:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Good point further showing how minor she is—
Iadmc
♫
talk 14:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Jono Jumamoy (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
The article does not pass
WP:POLITICIAN or
WP:GNG
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 13:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Romy Tiongco (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
The article does not meet the notability guidelines of
WP:POLITICIAN
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 13:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
People,
Politicians, and
Politics.
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 13:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Authors,
Christianity,
Philippines, and
United Kingdom.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 16:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. I think the two programmes on the BBC all about him and the first of these and its report his on him were what led me to start this page and think him notable enough - perhaps via general notability rather than as a politician per se. A political activist, NGO worker and then politician (
Msrasnw (
talk) 17:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC))
reply
- Comment - maybe you should find more sources, only 2 out of the 7 sources work.
-
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 00:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- If there are 2 "working" sources, that should be enough for
WP:GNG.
Howard the Duck (
talk) 05:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- One of the sources is a video source which does not work anymore, is one source okay?
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 05:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Our "policy" on this is
WP:LINKROT, and it being dead should not be taken against the article, more so if the reference is more than a decade old.
- So no, your premise of this article having just one source doesn't hold.
Howard the Duck (
talk) 07:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Carl Balita (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Doesn't appear to be notable independently of his senate run, for which
Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill#Political candidates would apply, with the sources given being candidate databases and interviews.
Chaotic Enby (
talk ·
contribs) 14:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
2018 Manila Pavilion Hotel fire (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Fails
Wikipedia:Notability (events). No evidence of lasting effects based on GNews Archives and GBooks search. A brief and cited mention at
List_of_building_or_structure_fires#2018 can also be an
alternative to deletion. --
Lenticel (
talk) 02:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect - Per Slgrandson
-
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 00:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Manels (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
An unsourced nothing. There was a bit more in it, none of it sourced, which I removed. I'm not good at
WP:BEFORE, but I couldn't even find a website for the company, just lots of other websites selling their stuff.
Bbb23 (
talk) 13:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Durie Kallahal (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
The Article does not have notability, according to
WP:POLITICIAN, a politician is not notable when him/her position is lower than Congressman/Congresswoman, I don't see
WP:GNG notability either.
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 00:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Sakib Salajin (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Article does not meet notability guidelines of
WP:POLITICIAN
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 07:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Dean Ebarle (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Filipino men's footballer, to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:SPORTCRIT. Contested PROD.
JTtheOG (
talk) 17:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - I researched Dean Ebarle, it has some notability, being the defender for a popular football team, im not that much interested in football, so correct me or ping me if im wrong.
-
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 09:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Denice Zamboanga (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
An article on this mixed martial artist was deleted three years ago after
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denice Zamboanga as failing to meet either
mixed martial arts notability or
general notability. At the time, there were also multiple drafts, probably because someone was trying to
game the system. The originators were then blocked for
sockpuppetry. This article does not differ materially from the deleted article. The subject still is not top-ten-ranked, and so does not meet
mixed martial arts notability. The article does not
speak for itself and explain how the subject meets
general notability. The subject's association with the
ONE Championship is now verified, but "so what?", participation in the
ONE Championship is not grounds for notability. The article has been
reference-bombed, but nothing in the article refers to
significant coverage in an article that does not
speak for itself. This article differs enough from the deleted article so that speedy deletion is not in order; but it does not differ enough from the deleted article to avoid deletion.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 04:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Sportspeople,
Women,
Martial arts, and
Philippines.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 04:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep: Sources 4, 8, 9, 20 and 24 are all RS that talks about her, the article seems to meet notability.
Oaktree b (
talk) 11:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Source #4 is her brother talking, and the subject is only namedropped. Source #8 interviews her, and almost entirely consists of quotes from the subject. Source #9 ... inquirer.net is a reliable source, but that's a scanty article consisting of five sentences aside from quotes from the subject, and that barely scrapes by if at all. #20 looks like a good source. #24 is scanty
routine sports coverage. I'm not digging deeper one way or another, but they're weak reeds to hang a keep.
Ravenswing 02:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comments She has never met
WP:NMMA. The first source mentioned above is an article about her brother, she is mentioned in passing because she was on the same fight card. The next three are pre-fight articles about her first match in the promotion's Grand Prix tournament (which would be typical coverage for any fighter). The final reference is a report on that fight, which she lost. Even if you believe that coverage is significant, it is all about one event. Didn't check other references, so I'm not voting yet.
Papaursa (
talk) 13:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Patrick Grogg (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I am unable to find anything approaching
WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Contested PROD.
JTtheOG (
talk) 21:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Sportspeople,
Football, and
Philippines.
JTtheOG (
talk) 21:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Giant
Snowman 17:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me.
Giant
Snowman 17:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete—Not finding enough to meet
WP:SIGCOV and nowhere near enough international experience to stand in for that.
Anwegmann (
talk) 22:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - Two of the sources are linking to the same webpage, the webpage itself is regular for soccer players, making it routine coverage, the other one only slightly mentions the player, therefore indicating no significant coverage.
TheNuggeteer (
talk) 9:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Maybe a redirect would make sense, but it's not clear which of the teams to target.
Better Nuncio (
talk) 09:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Baris Tasci (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I am unable to find anything approaching
WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Contested PROD.
JTtheOG (
talk) 19:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Syron Saut (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I am unable to find anything approaching
WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Contested PROD.
JTtheOG (
talk) 19:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
JW Marriott Panglao Island Resort & Spa (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
This under-construction hotel does not meet threshold for
WP:GNG or
WP:NBUILDING. All sources are
WP:TRADES publications and thus do not contribute to notability. Any attribution of "five-star" status or "80 spacious guest rooms" or "luxurious amenities" is both promotional and premature. I'd recommend redirecting here but since this hotel won't be open for at least three years the redirect won't be of much use to searchers.
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 16:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Architecture and
Philippines.
Eastmain (
talk •
contribs) 17:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per PROMO, this isn't yet notable.
SportingFlyer
T·
C 17:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. I think the references in the article establish notability. The nominator misunderstands the definition of
trade publication. A trade publication serves readers in a particular industry. A magazine or newspaper directed towards a general business audience (
Canadian Business,
The Wall Street Journal,
Crain's Chicago Business) does not have the potential conflict of interest that a single-industry publication such as
The Inland Printer might have. Moreover,
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) does not completely exclude trade magazines as sources. "Feature stories from leading trade magazines may be used where independence is clear." Of the references,
Hospitality News Philippines is a trade publication serving the hotel and restaurant sector.
Colliers is the research arm of a commercial real estate broker. The rest of the references seem to be general-audience publications, some with a focus on business, and several include a reporter's byline. The seemingly promotional text can probably be justified from the architectural plans and JW Marriott's reputation as a brand. Hotel stars, unlike Michelin stars, are generally self-awarded, so the developer's claim shouldn't be rejected as premature. A hotel's rating can decline over the years as it loses ground to newer and fancier competitors, or can improve after a significant renovation. Remember that the
Hotel Pensylvania in Manhattan stopped being a full-service hotel in its final years, and many of the other hotels and former hotels in Wikipedia started out as the finest hotels in their city but were perceived as less attractive once other competitors arrived in the market.
Eastmain (
talk •
contribs) 18:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Even if one rejects the TRADES premise, under
WP:NBUILDING there is a requirement for "significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." The sources cited in the article are
churnalism regurgitating
AppleOne's press release, with no evidence of in-depth additional reporting. Such "significant in-depth coverage" would be highly unlikely for a single under-construction hotel that does not appear to have any architectural distinction. Under NBUILDING and PROMO, this article is
WP:TOOSOON.
Dclemens1971 (
talk) 18:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - for all of the above, but mostly for the promo. There’s nothing “seemingly” promotional about it. It is promotional, and premature.
KJP1 (
talk) 19:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- p.s. Food and beverage outlets - in a hotel. Who knew!
KJP1 (
talk) 17:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Kenry Balobo (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Filipino men's footballer, to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:SPORTCRIT.
JTtheOG (
talk) 07:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Eric Giganto (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Filipino men's footballer, to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found was
this short piece.
JTtheOG (
talk) 04:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Light and Space Contemporary (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Could not find reliable sources online, except for some (including sources used in this article) having short mentions on this subject.
Sanglahi86 (
talk) 08:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Florencio Badelic Jr. (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I'll admit that I'm a bit unsure about this article. There are a lot of citations in the article, but all of them are routine and/or match reports. There seems to be little or no
WP:SIGCOV here.
Anwegmann (
talk) 00:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Giant
Snowman 18:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me.
Giant
Snowman 18:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep – Decent coverage in local media, even though it is from a not very popular football center, the article seems sufficiently based.
Svartner (
talk) 19:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- I don't disagree. There seems to be a lot of match reports in the mix, though, and little of substance. That said, I'm still unsure about the article as a whole. Thanks for the vote.
Anwegmann (
talk) 22:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
reply