From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an record of articles that were recently
nominated for Wikipedia Version 0.5 , but were not accepted due to concerns regarding the articles' quality. Articles are listed in the category in which they were nominated, with the most recent entires at the bottom of each section. The reasons for an article's archival can be found on the article's talk page.
Miscellaneous
Arts
Language & Communication
Philosophy & Religion
Everyday Life
Social Sciences & Society
Geography
History
Engineering & Technology
Mathematics
Natural Sciences
Miscellaneous nominations (if unsure what section to use)
Arts
Gone with the Wind (film) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
.... (
Complain ) (
Let us to it pell-mell ) 10:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
failed on techinal quality, mainly due to lack of refs, it has a lack of referneces tag. see talk page for suggestions.
Rlevse 16:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Wasteland Speech (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Start-Class, not too important.
Eyu100 03:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Language & Communication
Philosophy & Religion
Everyday Life
Baseball (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
VA and
FA .
Nifboy 06:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Severe need of copyediting, may qualify for FARCing, unencyclopedic prose, too many redlinks, external links in the main body of the text, unsourced statements.
Tito
xd (
?!? -
help us ) 02:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Chess (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
VA and
FA .
Nifboy 06:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: too many external links, no inline refs and with that very few references, and too many lists in-article.
Ch
u
ck
(척뉴넘) 02:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Marcus Allen (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
WP:GA , one of the best known American Football players
Jaranda
wat's sup 04:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed due to length, neutrality, and lack of detail.
Tito
xd (
?!? -
help us ) 05:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Yakiniku (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Very popular Japanese cooking style, the article has a nice picture too.
Mackan 09:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed because of length, article a little more than a stub, no refs
Jaranda
wat's sup 19:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Social Sciences & Society
Tony Blair (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
VA and
FA .
Nifboy 06:19, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: cleanup tag for refs section is not discussed on talk, but is still valid. Cleanup refs and renominate.
Ch
u
ck
(척뉴넘) 02:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
School counselor (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
whicky1978
talk 04:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC) Nomination "frozen" I have requested a wider world view.
Walkerma 03:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Still not addressed by 11 Aug so failed.
Walkerma 16:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Geography
Miskolc (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) –
Alensha
寫
词 12:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed because of having no refs as well as sloppy writing and the article is mostly lists or one sentence paragraphs
Jaranda
wat's sup 01:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Budapest (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
NCurse 08:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed because article has no refs, heavy linkfarm, barely any prose, mostly lists
Jaranda
wat's sup 06:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Cambodia (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) FA,
Walkerma 04:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: Lots of unsourced info, needs some cleanup, qualifies for
FARCing .
Jaranda
wat's sup 03:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
History
Great Retreat (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) , was one of the largest campaign scenes during WWI. Included vital battles,
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC).
reply
Failed on quality: stub no refs
Jaranda
wat's sup 06:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
First Battle of the Marne (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) On the "10 most important battle's" list here on Wikipedia.
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: too short
Jaranda
wat's sup 06:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
First Battle of the Aisne (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Part of a set of 3 important WWI battles. Well written.
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: stub no refs
Jaranda
wat's sup 06:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Second Battle of the Aisne (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Part of a set of 3 important WWI battles. Well written.
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: no refs
Jaranda
wat's sup 06:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Third Battle of the Aisne (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Part of a set of 3 important WWI battles. Well written.
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: no refs
Jaranda
wat's sup 06:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Ramesses II (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
GA , & one of the important ancient Egyptian Pharaohs. --
llywrch 00:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: no inline citation mess in refrences and I don't consider further reading as one, also feels like it's too short
Jaranda
wat's sup 17:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Spartan pederasty (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Tradition central to Spartan culture, an important state in Classical Greece.
Haiduc 05:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality and importance. Not comprehensively written, nor of sufficient importance.
Kaldari 02:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Engineering & Technology
Brain-computer interface (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Technlogy that is radically evolving...Imagine controlling objects by thought...Science, not fiction!
Failed on quality and importance - article is way to technical for a normal reader
Jaranda
wat's sup 06:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Fixed-wing aircraft (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
NCurse
work 19:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality - no refs
Jaranda
wat's sup 05:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Technology (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) (
VA .
NCurse
work 19:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality - Already failed by
Walkerma , few refs, short lead, section stubs, needs some severe cleanup
Jaranda
wat's sup 02:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Apple Computer (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
WP:GA ,
Walkerma 18:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality - too many unsourced statements, stripped of GA status to boot.
Tito
xd (
?!? ) 05:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
Technology (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Partial self-nom. This failed before, but has been overhauled.
Maurreen 00:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed renom on quality - stubby sections, few citations, bare links on prose.
Tito
xd (
?!? ) 17:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
Mathematics
Paul Erdős (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
NCurse 10:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: Not comprehensive. Could use sections on: Awards, Family, Education, as well as needing more references. Lastly, border-line on the importance factors.
Ch
u
ck
(척뉴넘) 07:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Natural Sciences
Albert Einstein (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
VA and
FA .
Nifboy 06:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: not up to par with the clean-up tag still there, which is valid based on article talk.
Ch
u
ck
(척뉴넘) 21:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Current protection as well
Jaranda
wat's sup 16:26, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Gene (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
FA .
NCurse 08:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: (Not really a FA) failed for same reason it was at FARC.
Ch
u
ck
(척뉴넘) 21:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Leó Szilárd (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
NCurse 10:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed beacause of having no refs
Jaranda
wat's sup 02:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Atom (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
WP:VA .
NCurse
work 19:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: stubby section, only one reference.
Tito
xd (
?!? -
help us ) 01:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Albert Szent-Györgyi (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
NCurse 10:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: poorly referenced, poorly structured, and not comprehensive. --
bcasterline •
talk 05:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Energy (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
WP:VA .
NCurse
work 19:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: no references whatsoever.
Tito
xd (
?!? -
help us ) 05:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Large blue butterfly (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Good article which shows complex relations between ants & butterfly.
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality and notabilty article is a little more than a stub, one ref only
Jaranda
wat's sup 03:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Roe Deer (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Featured in other languages & is pretty well informed.
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality and notablity The article is well-written, but it's a little more than a stub, and the trivia section moved me away, try to import info from the FAs.
Jaranda
wat's sup 03:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Breastfeeding (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
WP:FA .
NCurse
work 20:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed per the comments at its
FARC .
Tito
xd (
?!? -
help us ) 05:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Hoba meteorite (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Largest meteorite found on Earth.
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed because it's too short, one ref and no structure to the article
Jaranda
wat's sup 07:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Rhizanthella gardneri (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
Spawn Man 11:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC).
reply
Failed because it's too short and no refs
Jaranda
wat's sup 07:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Great Observatories program (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
WP:VA , The four telescopes which provided the greatest impact on modern astronomy.
Rnt20 13:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: First not a va, no refs, poor prose, poor
lead
Jaranda
wat's sup 22:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
James Webb Space Telescope (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
WP:VA , The successor to the
Hubble Space Telescope , when launched will be the most important astronomical telescope
Rnt20 11:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality: Not a VA, not very comprehensive, no inline refs, and not that important either. --
Rory096 05:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Obesity (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
NCurse 08:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
Too technical for general audience.
Maurreen 06:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Photosynthesis (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views )
Ryan! 22:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality because it has three section stubs.
NCurse
work 08:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Ant (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views ) Looks decent, popular/important topic, on the SOS CD,
Walkerma 05:36, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Failed on quality because it has two section stubs.
NCurse
work 21:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
reply