June 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:12, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
Highbeam is defunct. Note: Most (possibly all) of the transclusions of this template are pages that somehow failed to get purged after
a link to Highbeam was removed from Template:Find sources a few months ago.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 21:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
DannyS712 (
talk) 00:13, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
Poorly made, not worth keeping. Delete per
WP:TNT.
Störm
(talk) 16:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - if this is indeed wanted, it should be a normal navbox and not a sidebar. --
Gonnym (
talk) 11:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 June 10.
kingboyk (
talk) 01:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:56, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs) 20:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:50, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete not needed (template creator).
Rob984 (
talk) 18:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:50, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:50, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete This changes so rarely nthat it could be updated manually if this number changes.
- Delete per nom. --
Gonnym (
talk) 11:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
kingboyk (
talk) 01:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: not sure if it's needed or not, but
Evolution of Pakistan Eastern Command plan uses a manual navbox with the same code. --
Gonnym (
talk) 11:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The template was created by the same person who added the raw code into the article.
Gonnym, even if converted to a transclusion, would this affect the overall opinion that it's a barely-used template?
Primefac (
talk) 00:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused, partially overlaps navigation found in
Template:United Nations
Frietjes (
talk) 15:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as
G7 by
Reaper Eternal (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 07:08, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- As its creator, I say delete it. It was supposed to be used, but never was.
Noah
Talk 22:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused, replaced by
Module:Sports table
Frietjes (
talk) 15:40, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused copy of
Template:Premio Scirea
Frietjes (
talk) 15:37, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused, replaced by standard rail succession box templates
Frietjes (
talk) 15:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 June 10.
Primefac (
talk) 00:52, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused, no parent article?
Frietjes (
talk) 15:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused fork of
Template:Volpi Cup for Best Actress
Frietjes (
talk) 15:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused, blanked
Frietjes (
talk) 15:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs) 20:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- As the creator of this template, the record in question was superseded on July 14, 2018. Now we have a better means to display such information. Go ahead and remove.
Trackinfo (
talk) 16:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy Delete,
WP:CSD#G7. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c) 09:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused, probably replaced by
Template:Briarcliff Manor, New York
Frietjes (
talk) 15:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Correct, can be deleted now.
ɱ
(talk) 16:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:28, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 June 10. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:22, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 June 10.
Primefac (
talk) 00:59, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:25, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. --
Gonnym (
talk) 11:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. Target page was deleted back in 2016, thi should have been deleted with it.
Night
fury 14:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a bus guide.
Ajf773 (
talk) 23:58, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
almost entirely redlinks
Frietjes (
talk) 15:21, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. so.many.red.links. --
Gonnym (
talk) 11:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused and almost all redlinks
Frietjes (
talk) 15:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 15:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 June 10. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
appears to have been replaced by
template:Tamsui-Xinyi Line (Taipei Metro) RDT
Frietjes (
talk) 15:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 June 10. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:22, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 00:22, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
Unused template that was previously used in only 1 article. No reason to deprecate it as it has no value as its just simple text.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).