The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 19:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)reply
I think this EMPTY template should be deleted. (Another possible option might be to replace this template with the contents of
d:Template:Welcome/lang).
------ 21:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Unused subpage of the template, which was wrongly used as a sandbox by other user.
Matthew_hktc 17:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 19:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)reply
nominator's rationale: The team
A.C. Cesena was folded. The illegitimate successor,
A.S.D. Romagna Centro Cesena, is an amateur team in the top division of Italian amateur football. Both team did not need a squad navigation template, due to no current squad and a squad full of red link respectively.
Matthew_hktc 20:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC)reply
delete per nom
Hhkohh (
talk) 01:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Procedural close. This is not how you nominate redirects for deletion.
Primefac (
talk) 18:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Moved to more logical names. No longer needed. –
BrandonXLF(t@lk) 00:07, 17 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).