November 28
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 23:48, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
old and unused
Frietjes (
talk) 23:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused fork
Frietjes (
talk) 23:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and generally duplicates the functionality provided by
Template:Center and friends.
Frietjes (
talk) 23:45, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Agree – I don't see a need for this template anymore. It's unused and {{
center}} is a cleaner version. --
Imperator3733 (
talk) 04:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 23:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 23:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 18:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 23:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 23:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 23:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates navigation found in
Template:Hans Werner Henze
Frietjes (
talk) 21:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Agree - Since it is no longer being used, yes, it should be deleted. --
Jay (
talk) 03:47, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates
Template:Herschend Family Entertainment
Frietjes (
talk) 21:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and all redirects
Frietjes (
talk) 21:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. -Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me 16:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
all red links
Frietjes (
talk) 21:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
all red links
Frietjes (
talk) 21:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was withdrawn
(non-admin closure)
Frietjes (
talk) 23:27, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. Now added to the listed pages. -
DePiep (
talk) 22:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused infobox template
Frietjes (
talk) 21:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused television guide template
Frietjes (
talk) 21:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete, still unused.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - template has been fixed and now can be used as originally intended - example:
Newry railway station. ~
Karl 20:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused infobox template
Frietjes (
talk) 21:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused subtemplate of a redirect
Frietjes (
talk) 21:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:33, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and generally duplicates
Template:Hindu temples in Karnataka
Frietjes (
talk) 21:33, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, one link
Frietjes (
talk) 21:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:29, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on
2016 December 6
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
no documentation and not used
Frietjes (
talk) 20:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, 4th place squad
Frietjes (
talk) 20:29, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates
Oran#Climate
Frietjes (
talk) 20:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
template name is Circle City Conference, but the content is for the
Southern Indiana Athletic Conference
Frietjes (
talk) 20:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
This was an error made on my part. Delete it so I can make the infobox properly.
Rhatsa26X (
talk) 03:23, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
If you need to delete the Southern Indiana Athletic Conference infobox, then do that as well. I have what I need do the rest to fix this problem entirely
Rhatsa26X (
talk) 03:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
out-of-date and all red links
Frietjes (
talk) 20:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
all the links go to the same page, or are red links
Frietjes (
talk) 20:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and all redlinks
Frietjes (
talk) 20:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
according to
Peter coxhead, "
these have been agreed to be deleted"
Frietjes (
talk) 20:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete all Redundant with categories and articles on the genera themselves. Most of these paint a misleading picture of the species in a genus, as only blue links are included and most of the genera have many species that don't have articles (including all species entails an undesirable see of red links). These require ongoing maintenance as new blue links are created, new species are described, or old species are brought into synonymy and that maintenance isn't really happening. I will note that the templates for Sarracenia, Utricularia, Heliamphora and House martins do appear have all species accounted for (without verifying exactly against the species list in the genus article or authoritative sources), although there is still maintenance that isn't happening (e.g. the house martin template links to former titles that are now redirects, not current article titles). Wikipedia is better off without species in genus navigational templates
Plantdrew (
talk) 17:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused plant genus template. hundreds of these have been deleted in prior discussions.
Frietjes (
talk) 20:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Unused, redundant with category system. Paints a misleading picture of the number of species in the genus as only blue links are included. Requires ongoing maintenance which isn't happening (template only includes 3 of 6 species with blue links).
Plantdrew (
talk) 17:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, out-of-date, and duplicates
Caracas_FC#Current_roster
Frietjes (
talk) 20:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, 10th place finish, and duplicates
AfroBasket_2015_squads#Cape_Verde
Frietjes (
talk) 20:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
provides zero navigation
Frietjes (
talk) 20:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 19:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused subtemplate
Frietjes (
talk) 19:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was mark as historical
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused template superseded by JPL's Small-Body Database since 2006, and recently by {{
JPL}}. ~
Tom.Reding (
talk ⋅
dgaf) 13:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Delete, or keep but deprecate. ~
Tom.Reding (
talk ⋅
dgaf) 01:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- delete, no longer useful.
Frietjes (
talk) 23:49, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- keep, for historical purposes. Mark the template itself as deprecated so it doesn't get used anew by accident.
Urhixidur (
talk) 01:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I'm ok with this, and I've updated the TfD heading. ~
Tom.Reding (
talk ⋅
dgaf) 01:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template contains one entry.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 07:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).