November 29
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and not particularly useful
Frietjes (
talk) 22:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
not needed, pages use
template:sports rivalry series table
Frietjes (
talk) 22:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 22:35, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 22:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and out-of-date
Frietjes (
talk) 21:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 21:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates maps found in the articles (e.g.,
Indian Institutes of Technology)
Frietjes (
talk) 21:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and no working links
Frietjes (
talk) 21:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, out-of-date, and all redlinks
Frietjes (
talk) 21:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
thankfully unused and incomplete considering the size of
Category:Indian scientists
Frietjes (
talk) 18:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and broken
Frietjes (
talk) 18:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 18:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, could be "re userfied"
Frietjes (
talk) 18:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused file permission template
Frietjes (
talk) 18:23, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 18:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 18:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- delete Actually, superceded is a better description of the status of these three templates. ISAP is an abbreviation of the old name for line 1 of the Athens Metro, these templates were for the station succession boxes of stations on the line. On a quick review of the station articles, the station succession boxes are now using {{
OASA Metro color}}, {{
OASA Metro lines}} and {{
OASA Metro stations}} instead. So these three ISAP templates are redundant.
Slambo
(Speak) 15:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Speedy Deleted per author's request
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 16:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
duplicate, speedy delete.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 05:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- weak delete, championship-winning squad, but its not used.
Frietjes (
talk) 15:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Current squad template for dissolved squad. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with only one blue link. Insufficient to aid navigation. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:40, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with only two blue links. Insufficient to aid navigation. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with only two blue links. Insufficient to aid navigation. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with only two blue links. Insufficient to aid navigation. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with only two blue links. Insufficient to aid navigation. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with only two blue links. Insufficient to aid navigation. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with one blue link. Unused. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with no blue links. Unused. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with no blue links. Unused. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- delete, 13th place (last place) squad.
Frietjes (
talk) 15:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and gaudy enough that it's really
WP:TNT material. This certainly wouldn't work as any sort of navbox. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:35, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I fixed the format, but I agree we can probably delete it.
Frietjes (
talk) 15:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:35, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. No need for such a template for a province that has a population of no mere than 230,000.--
Preacher lad (
talk) 12:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and gaudy enough that it's really
WP:TNT material. This certainly wouldn't work as any sort of navbox. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:35, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I fixed the format, but I agree we can probably delete it.
Frietjes (
talk) 15:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- delete, not needed.
Frietjes (
talk) 18:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- delete, Template:Municipalities of Rondônia already exists.
Prburley (
talk) 00:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unfinished template. ~
Rob13
Talk 03:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
reply
I am proposing this template for deletion because it consists of mostly
WP:INUNIVERSE cruft and trivial information.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) 03:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- weak keep, I don't see how this is any worse than any of the other
Category:Fictional family tree templates. however, if there is consensus to remove it from the articles, then of course it should be deleted. or if there is consensus to delete all of them, then I can see how they all would be deleted as in universe cruft.
Frietjes (
talk) 21:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
Rob13
Talk 03:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep, as these trees help with navigation and obviously provide an understanding of how these characters are interconnected. Further, this one does not have extraneous info and is well-sourced.15:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).