-
123Aristotle (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)
16 August 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
All are
WP:SPAs here to promote a Chinese flautist named Wang Shuxuan.
Timmyshin (
talk) 19:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Administrator note
Looks like a duck to me. I've blocked the sockpuppet indefinitely and warned the master account and the IP address. No tags necessary at this time, in my opinion. Marking case as closed.
Mz7 (
talk) 03:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
reply
02 September 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
This master was registered in early August, but only became active today to support the sock's page,
Joseph Shen. Compare usernames, edit summaries (
[1]
[2]). Requesting CU because 1) there may well be other socks in this promo farm and 2) this may be
User:Mokezhilao. Thanks,
GAB
gab 02:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Added James Sitars, an SPA on Leonardo8964's
Wong Man Li.
GAB
gab 21:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Clerk endorsed - Endorsing my own request. Thanks,
GAB
gab 02:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
Clerk note: I added two more accounts, one much older, and have moved the case accordingly.
GAB
gab 20:58, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The following are
Confirmed:
- A connection between this group and
Mokezhilao is
Possible, but by no means clear.
-
Clerk note: Pinging
Timmyshin if he'd like to comment. Thanks,
GAB
gab 22:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
- I took a look at these articles, and I think the style is different from Mokezhilao and most of his socks. My guess is they are not the same person, but there may be a relationship (e.g. work for the same advertising company.)
Timmyshin (
talk) 23:00, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
- OK, let's keep these guys separate. Closing since it looks like we're pretty much done here. Thanks to everyone for their help on this.
GAB
gab 20:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
05 September 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
These seem to be SPAs intent on promoting Chinese companies. Itpediaoo started expanding
Man Wah Holdings Limited right after Leonardo8964 was blocked as a sock of 123Aristotle. There is overlap between this group of editors and the ones already blocked at
Che Jianxin,
Wong Man Li,
Red Star Macalline Group Corporation Limited, and
the deletion discussion for Joseph Shen. Note that VissarionovichStalin is already blocked as referencing Josef Stalin. –
FlyingAce
✈hello 22:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Added User Createdinger and 124.116.220.202 as per edits in similar style on
Zhang Lijun(entrepreneur) pseudonym
Jake Brockman
talk 21:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Clerk endorsed Please compare these accounts (+
ReykjavikMax (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)) with each other and the above sockfarm. Thanks,
GAB
gab 23:29, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
- And
Accountness888 (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki).
GAB
gab 15:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
In progress
Katie
talk 22:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
- These accounts are
Confirmed to each other and the master:
07 September 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Apparently using Chinese input method to enter a character in Joseph Shen's AfD discussion and gives "Reserve" vote which is the same as the other two that are determined to be socks. -★-
PlyrStar93. →
Message me. 🖉← 12:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Another "Reserve" vote in
Joseph Shen's AfD discussion. -★-
PlyrStar93. →
Message me. 🖉← 21:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
- Please note that this case are involved cross-wiki abuse, all accounts have been globally locked.
SA 13 Bro (
talk) 18:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Blocked and tagged.
GAB
gab 18:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
08 September 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Editing of
Draft:Wang Shuxuan and recreation of
Wang Shuxuan after deletion. The former was edited by a known sock and the latter originally created by the master. Usernames are awfully similar as well.
Primefac (
talk) 13:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Clerk endorsed - Please compare to the master +
无英雄的英雄 (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki). Thanks,
GAB
gab 15:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
In progress -
Katie
talk 23:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
Likely to each other, plus
朱少强 (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki). These four are also
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to
Mokezhilao (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki) - same range, slightly different devices.
Katie
talk 23:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
Administrator note Xuan98xuan, Menghuan78, 无英雄的英雄, and 朱少强 are now
Blocked and tagged. As for a behavioral connection to Mokezhilao, I can see a similarity in the resume-like structure of the articles they've created (using an "Experience" section:
[3]
[4]), but as far as I can tell there's no other behavioral idiosyncracy that connects them. Based on the articles they've created, Xuan98xuan seems to have a better command of English than Mokezhilao, though not by much. Since all accounts involved are now blocked, I don't think any further action is necessary at this time. Marking as closed.
Mz7 (
talk) 21:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
13 September 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Re=created
Red Star Macalline Group Corporation Limited. Sleeper check at CU discretion, as I'm not 100 familiar with this farm.
Crow
Caw 15:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
- I noticed that this user created
Red Star Macalline Group Corporation Limited, which apparently blocked user Aristotle123 has done as well. Since I only noticed this while checking for previous deletions and links to the page; I'll enter this report, and let other people take it from here. If the article needs to be deleted under G5, I'd highly recommend salting it.
I dream of horses (
My talk page) (
My edits) @ 08:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Blocked and tagged, article deleted.
GAB
gab 15:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
24 October 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Recreating
Sun Yuchen/
Yuchen Sun/
Justin Sun as
Draft:Yuchen.
Timmyshin (
talk) 19:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This case is being reviewed by
Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
-
Awaiting administrative action - Per the above,
Looks like a duck to me. Please block the new sock indefinitely and delete the draft.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 23:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
reply
03 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Sun Yuchen /
Yuchen Sun /
Justin Sun again as
Draft:Justin Sun.
Timmyshin (
talk) 01:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Blocked and tagged, page deleted.
GAB
gab 03:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
09 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Created
Draft:Tiger pan =
Tiger Pan which was repeatedly created by Mokezhilao's socks.
Timmyshin (
talk) 21:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
11 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Both accounts were created this month. Made a ton of redirect requests on
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects between them, all involving Chinese characters, not unlike the sockpuppet
User:Jooktmggs about a month ago. Very suspicious. And the articles 独之占鳌头 created are all promotional in nature.
Timmyshin (
talk) 02:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This case is being reviewed by
Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - That sure looks suspicious. Please check to confirm and identify potential sleepers.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 22:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Both socks
Confirmed to Jooktmggs and
No sleepers
immediately visible.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 21:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Tagging and closing.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 21:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
Administrator note I deleted the promotional trash they created.
GAB
gab 02:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
14 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
CrystalYu created
Draft:Tiger Pan just a few days after
Draft:Tiger pan was deleted. XipoXinjushi exhibits the same behavior as the 2 socks above.
Timmyshin (
talk) 21:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This case is being reviewed by
Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
17 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
As per
obvious. All
Blocked without tags, but please check for sleepers (Laohuangdidi is an apparent sleeper). Thanks,
GAB
gab 01:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Clerk endorsed - Endorsing my own request. Thanks,
GAB
gab 01:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
No sleepers
immediately visible. ~
Rob13
Talk 22:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
19 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
According to links in the article,
Draft:Wang Chun is the wife of
Zhanglijun =
Zhang Lijun (business person) =
Zhang Lijun(entrepreneur) =
Zhang Lijun(enterpriser) =
Zhang Lijun(disambiguation) =
Draft:Zhang Lijun(CEO)
Timmyshin (
talk) 21:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
As
Ammarpad put,
Cool-ying likes moving Articles of people submitted for AFC review(
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Cool-ying).
And you can check his contributions,which sound like promotion and advertisement
KommossMM (
talk) 15:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- I second GAB's opinion that
KommossMM (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki) is as suspicious as the one he/she's nominating.
Timmyshin (
talk) 17:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Uh,I agree with
Ammarpad and
Timmyshin.(
talk) 16:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Thanks,
GAB
gab 17:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- I'll do my best, but this is not as easy as I like them.
- 123Aristotle is on a proxy, and Isabellegao888 also seems to be on a (different) proxy.
Confirmed to each other:
-
KommossMM and
Biyadishamo are
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to the above and
Likely to
Kaunkun13143 from the previous case. Based on geolocation,
独之占鳌头, who was blocked in the other previous case, seems
Possible to the ones I checked. Dchamp59 and Zeeshanalam242, as far as I can tell, are
Unrelated to anyone. I blocked Cool-ying, Luoshichang, and Aomonengzhu without tags, but someone else can add them when they figure out the difference between Xuan98xuan and 123Artistotle.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 16:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Thank you for the check, NRP.
Mz7, I'd appreciate any insight you could provide on this (since you've dealt with Xuan98xuan). Thanks,
GAB
gab 15:49, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- @
GeneralizationsAreBad: The key behavioral aspect which I used to connect
无英雄的英雄 to
Xuan98xuan was the recreation of a page relating to a Chinese musician "Wang Shuxuan". Compare
[5] (by 无英雄的英雄) to
[6] (by Xuan98xuan) – they're the same text, which
quacked for me. Given the CheckUser result here, we can see a pattern of creating articles/drafts related to Chinese people, especially businesspeople:
Weijirenren,
我滴那个神,
Shabi256 (same subject as 我滴那个神),
Rrrp666p (also the same subject as 我滴那个神),
Aomonengzhu. The behavior is similar enough that I believe Xuan98xuan is indeed a part of this group of socks.
Mz7 (
talk) 21:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- As for the difference between Xuan98xuan and 123Artistotle, I'm not familiar with the latter, but it seems that they also tend to create drafts relating to Chinese businesspeople:
Draft:Tiger Pan,
Zhu Jingyi (artist),
Wang Chun. It would not surprise me if 123Artistotle and Xuan98xuan are one and the same.
Mz7 (
talk) 21:19, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- I've blocked Biyadishamo without tags based on the above CU finding of possilikely and the fact that they have continued to move articles by some of the CU blocked accounts above to mainspace from draft. I'll be filing another SPI requesting CU in a few minutes based on some other suspicious activity I've found for this account.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 22:43, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ivanvector: Hate to say it, but we should merge Xuan98xuan's SPI into this one. Could we use the previous method? Thanks,
GAB
gab 16:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Follow-up ping:
Berean Hunter. Thanks,
GAB
gab 16:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- @
GeneralizationsAreBad: the method I used to merge the other cases (keeping the archives separate) was probably ill-advised. I don't really know what the alternative is that won't result in a jumbled mess of an archive, but it seems to me from a few frustrating interactions that the location of the archives is of more interest to CheckUsers than it is to clerks (and more important to them than archive history coherence) so I'd confer with them for advice. As for Xuan98xuan, that's only two reports and probably wouldn't be a problem to just merge into the archive for this case.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 16:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ivanvector: I merged the cases and retagged the Xuan98xuan group; time to figure out the tags for everyone else here. Oh, joy.
GAB
gab 17:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- @
GeneralizationsAreBad: I don't think I have any useful advice on tagging, but I had a thought the other day that for this sort of merge of cases with complex, overlapping histories, you could just straight-merge them into one archive and then collapse the older reports under a "previously reported under <oldcasename>" banner. It doesn't seem to matter that the revision history will be mangled, as long as it's all in the same place.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 18:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
22 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Recreating
Draft:Tiger Pan
Timmyshin (
talk) 19:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
"
Blocked and tagged.
GAB
gab 01:29, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
23 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
All of these accounts (and the IP) created AfC drafts moved to mainspace outside of the AfC process by
Biyadishamo (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki), who I behaviorally blocked above after the CU finding because they also moved a draft of a CU confirmed sock into mainspace from AfC.
Creations:
[7],
[8],
[9]
Moves by Biyadishamo:
[10],
[11],
[12]
Requesting CU to confirm and check for other accounts. Realize there will be no CU comment on the IP, but listed it for the record.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 22:56, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Unrelated to anyone I've checked, and to each other. 123Aristotle's sole edit within the CU cutoff was on a proxy when I peeked at his IP address last time, but these don't look like obvious proxies to me.
No comment with respect to IP address(es), of course.
No sleepers
immediately visible. I don't really know how these accounts fit into the grand scheme of things, but I don't think they're the same person.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 06:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
30 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Recreation of
Justin Sun as
Justin Suen which is kind of interesting since the title isn't even salted...
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Blocked and tagged, page deleted.
GAB
gab 17:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
30 November 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
I'm not totally sure, but
Draft:Wendy Yu has the Mokezhilao-feel to it. Then I realize that Naoziwatele created
Wendy Yu last year which was deleted unanimously via
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Yu. Requesting checkuser for both.
Timmyshin (
talk) 20:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
01 December 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Recreating
Draft:Justin Sun.
Timmyshin (
talk) 20:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Blocked and tagged, draft deleted.
GAB
gab 21:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
03 December 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Draft:Qu Yi (Musical Actor) looks suspicious.
Timmyshin (
talk) 14:14, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
User:GeneralizationsAreBad I might have been wrong. Feel free to close it.
Timmyshin (
talk) 16:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- @
Timmyshin: I'm sorry, but I'm just not seeing it. Could you please clarify the link? Thanks,
GAB
gab 16:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- OK, closing.
GAB
gab 17:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
08 December 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Recreating
GeekPwn, which was deleted by
User:Alex Shih in October, as
Draft:GreekPwn (with a "r").
GeekPwn was first created by
User:Wj887, a suspected sock. (
User:GeekPwn is already blocked but not tagged.)
Timmyshin (
talk) 21:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
12 December 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
Recreating the Zhang Lijun couple (
Draft:Wang Chun &
Zhanglijun =
Zhang Lijun (business person) =
Zhang Lijun(entrepreneur) =
Zhang Lijun(enterpriser) =
Zhang Lijun(disambiguation) =
Draft:Zhang Lijun(CEO) =
Draft:Zhang Lijun (disambiguation)) as
Draft:Zhang Lijun v1 and
Draft:Wang Chun v1.
Timmyshin (
talk) 20:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Blocked without tags.
GAB
gab 17:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Now tagged.
GAB
gab 16:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
13 June 2018
Suspected sockpuppets
(Suspected users and IPs in this case)
(What I've submitted to meta-wiki, some are scale in zhwp)
(Suspected IP(s) in other case, which performs same actions like Chaopi)
Firstly, On Apr 15 2018, Assezde.Paroles, the socket puppet of 123Aristotle (
comfirmed by zhwp's cuer), voted at Chinese Wikipedia's AfD (
diff url).
*{{Vk}}。诸位用户,作为新手,不太了解维基百科的相关社群规则,试采冒犯规则。现已经移出相关内容。鄙人认为:
1、用中文谷歌搜索词条中文名称,有2800条结果;用英文Google搜索Liu Lisi,则有732,000条结果,用百度搜索中文名称,有102,000条结果。足见颇具关注度,并非路人甲。
2、谷歌新闻搜索中文名称,有两篇[[法国国际广播电台]]专题报道:[http://cn.rfi.fr/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD/20161111-%E5%9C%A8%E5%B7%B4%E9%BB%8E%E4%B8%BA%E8%87%AA%E5%B7%B1%E5%88%9B%E4%B8%8B%E4%B8%80%E7%89%87%E5%A4%A9%E7%A9%BA%E7%9A%84%E8%AE%BE%E8%AE%A1%E5%B8%88%E5%88%98%E5%8A%9B%E5%8F%B8 在巴黎为自己创下一片天空的设计师刘力司]以及[http://cn.rfi.fr/%E6%B3%95%E5%9B%BD/20170712-%E8%AE%BE%E8%AE%A1%E5%B8%88%E5%88%98%E5%8A%9B%E5%8F%B8%E7%9A%84%E5%B7%B4%E9%BB%8E%E7%9B%9B%E5%AE%B4 设计师刘力司的"巴黎盛宴"]。足见颇具关注度。
3、卢森堡[[RTL集团]]电视台专访:[http://www.rtl.lu/lifestyle/people/994065.html Reportage: de Concierge vun de Räichen]。足见颇具关注度。[[User:Assezde.Paroles|Assezde.Paroles]]([[User talk:Assezde.Paroles|留言]]) 2018年4月15日 (日) 13:17 (UTC)
Translation:
“
|
Dear all users concerned, I, as a novice, do not understand Wikipedia's relevant community rules, and just offended the rules. The relevant content has now been removed. I humbly think: 1. Using Google to search the entry's title in Chinese, there are 2800 results; Using English to search Liu Lisi, There is 732000 results; Using Baidu to search there are 102,000 results. It shows that there is considerable noteability, not a john-doe. 2. Using Google News search for Chinese names, there are two special reports on French international radio (1, 2). 3.Interview with TV station RTL Group in Luxembourg: (3)
|
”
|
This sort of statement behavior attempts to prove that an item has noteability is exactly the same as what User:07989Didyoueatanything did before (
diff url). Based on my understanding of this user's behavior, User:07989Didyoueatanything is probably 123Aristotle's socket puppet.
Secondly, the user 07989Didyoueatanything created
Liu_Youju just 3 days after Hola.Spada.Verso.il.Sorriso created the same one on Chinese Wikipedia. According to the fact that article Liu Youju on Chinese Wikipedia is likely a press release, and the username Hola.Spada.Verso.il.Sorriso is similar to User:Leonardo Di Ser Piero Da Finci (the socket puppet of 123Aristotle), I wonder if 07989Didyoueatanything is also a socket puppet.
云间守望 - (
Talk with WQL) 09:32, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
- (
edit conflict) @
Ivanvector: Thanks, this is, yes, a cross-wiki abusement involving zhwiki, enwiki and even frwiki, ruwiki. This suspected user, 123Aristotle, is selling his non-revealing paid edits on
Taobao (
link for his e-shop), a famous P2P shopping website, and he admitted to me that
Toutiao is his non-revealing paid works. I need enwp's local CU to get if they are socket puppets since they are stale in zhwp but not stale in enwp. --
云间守望 - (
Talk with WQL) 13:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I've added an IP, since he said he lives in Huizhou and he
admitted that it is his real IP.--
云间守望 - (
Talk with WQL) 13:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Clerk endorsed -
07989Didyoueatanything is clearly gaming
WP:ACREQ (
WP:ACTRIAL at the time) to create promotional articles, and is active recently. Please check against the other account which is confirmed via zhwiki. @
WQL: I can't parse Chinese well enough to communicate even a little bit, but could you please advise the clerks and/or checkusers at zhwiki that this case should be treated as cross-wiki abuse, and confirmed accounts globally locked? If they read English they can follow up with me directly on my talk page here. Thanks.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 13:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
-
Ivanvector, I believe the WMF has removed local CU access from zhwiki and that it is entirely handled by stewards now. Pinging
revi on this.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 13:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Already performed CU. CheckUsers: see CUwiki oldid 27214. — regards,
Revi 13:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
- @
-revi: I don't know what "oldid" means.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 13:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
- paste "Special:Permalink/27214" on cuwiki search bar. — regards,
Revi 13:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
-
WQL, please don't comment in the Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin area unless you are one. I've moved the comments up so they don't confuse people.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 13:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
- @
WQL: please don't add more accounts while the checkuser is working. It confuses things. If more accounts are technically related he'll find them, and we can't check IPs anyway.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 14:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Assezde.Paroles and 07989Didyoueatanything are
Confirmed to each other. They also appear to be the same as socks from 2017. I've blocked both without tags. Chaopi and PasPenny.S appear to be technically
Unrelated to each other and to the other two. I believe that –revi checked only data at zh.wiki and apparently found sufficient evidence of socking by those two accounts based on the blocks at zh.wiki. I would take that into consideration, along with behavior, and if they are behaviorally persuasive, block them. I don't consider myself familiar enough with the patterns of disruption in this case to do so.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 15:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Note: I did not block anyone on zhwiki - block is probably based on local admin’s discretion. And yes I only checked zhwiki, not enwiki. — regards,
Revi 16:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The account that was not checked also has not edited, and as the remaining accounts are shown to be unrelated I see no more to do here. Closing.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 13:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
reply
31 August 2018
Suspected sockpuppets
Another
WP:SPA for
Justin Sun
Timmyshin (
talk) 19:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk assistance requested: - Could an admin clerk please merge this into the correct casepage?
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 20:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
reply
-
Clerk note: @
Sir Sputnik:
Done
GAB
gab 02:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
reply
-
Blocked and tagged, draft deleted.
GAB
gab 15:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
reply
29 January 2019
Suspected sockpuppets
Clearly a paid account, almost certainly from China, articles written in styles very similar to those by the 123Aristotle farm.
Timmyshin (
talk) 22:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
reply
Added 5258若批评不自由则赞美无意义 and 3 Jiangsu IPs concerned, Created almost the same article on zhwp, which was created by 123Aristotle (Chinavip) before per log. --
云间守望 - (
Talk with WQL) 05:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed
Blocked and tagged.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 10:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Three of the accounts listed by the filers are stale so
Behavioural evidence needs evaluation.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 10:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- No need to block stale accounts - closing.
GAB
gab 14:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
20 February 2019
Suspected sockpuppets
HelenLeeJY's only contribution was editing
Draft:Kuai Shou a few hours after it was created by SylviaSu0217. These 2 accounts are clearly related. I'm requesting Checkuser because I think the article also shows some 123Aristotle traits.
Timmyshin (
talk) 00:42, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Unrelated to the master but
Confirmed to each other.
Meatpuppetry is possible. Same IP, different OSs, no phones involved.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 11:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
-
Administrator note Since the two accounts have not edited abusively and are not connected to the alleged master, I'm ignoring them. Closing.
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 05:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
reply
22 February 2019
Suspected sockpuppets
See
m:SRCU#5258若批评不自由则赞美无意义@zhwiki. Also, this account is used to create articles about Chinese companies e.g.
RoboSpace. Request for finding sleepers. --
云间守望 - (
Talk with WQL) 07:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed,
Blocked and tagged,
No sleepers
immediately visible.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 13:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
09 March 2019
Suspected sockpuppets
Like his previous sock Coqja'uv, made a bunch of seemingly pointless edits (like changing "28" to "twenty-eight") to get to autoconfirmed, then drops a promotional article on something in China.
Timmyshin (
talk) 01:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This case is being reviewed by
Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on
Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
Awaiting administrative action Please indef
Qünileliq-OZY (
talk ·
contribs).
Cabayi (
talk) 11:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
reply
-
Administrator note Indeffed the sockpuppet account. Closing.
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 15:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
reply
15 March 2019
Suspected sockpuppets
Exact same MO as the previous socks: numerous pointless and sneaky edits to get to autoconfirmed (All he did to
CBS Interactive was inserting citations, but if you look carefully these were already cited in the article. For
List of songs recorded by Zubeen Garg he simply reversed the order of a chronological table.), then creates a promotional article on a Chinese subject - in this case the creator of a "new" cancer treatment scheme with a prominent weblink in the infobox. Requesting Checkuser because the likelihood of potential sleepers appears large considering the recent frequency of SPI reports.
Timmyshin (
talk) 20:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Unrelated. Appears to be from a different country.
T. Canens (
talk) 16:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
reply
-
Administrator note Closing with no action taken per checkuser results.
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 21:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
reply
04 June 2019
Suspected sockpuppets
Similar editing patterns including but not limited to:
-
Connectedtech and
Gurufintech both edited
Draft:AMTD_Foundation
-
Sadmnmn created
AMTD_Group, where COI templates were persistently removed by
Connectedtech and
Regaliaman.
Fingururu and
Samchong89 also edited this article.
-
Samchong89,
Fingururu,
Regaliaman,
Seeyoulaterxyz,
Sadmnmn and
Connectedtech all edited
Calvin Choi.
-
Seeyoulaterxyz translated
Marcellus Wong (created by Fingururu) to Chinese Wikipedia
zh:王锐强,
Samchong89 translated
Calvin Choi (Created by Sadmnmn) to
zh:蔡志坚
- There was one warning related to
Calvin_Choi on
Sadmnmn's talk page on zhwiki
- Both
Seeyoulaterxyz and
Fingururu created their user page with hello and a sign, which is similiar to what 123A does.
- LTA 123A likes to use username including "89" as well (
Samchong89).
94rain
Talk 07:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- The listed accounts, plus the others below, are
Confirmed to each other and apparently
Unrelated to previous socks:
- Blocked the unblocked accounts without tags.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 14:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
reply
18 September 2019
Suspected sockpuppets
See
[13],when admin delete
Draft:Calvin Choi(reason,G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (123Aristotle) in violation of ban or block) in 4 June 2019,this user re create it in 17 September 2019
[14].
MCC214
#
ex umbra in solem 08:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed
Stale but related and now blocked:
Blocked and tagged
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 15:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
reply
06 December 2019
Suspected sockpuppets
It seem connects to the paid editor
Sadmnmn (
talk ·
contribs) that blocked from this SPI (See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/123Aristotle/Archive#04 June 2019) The new user that recreated
Draft:AMTD Group (the old draft was moved to
Draft:AMTD Group (China) and deleted on 4 June 2019; userspace draft also existed in
User:Sadmnmn/sandbox)
Matthew hk (
talk) 08:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
- Thanks for reporting and the CU. I have reported the account to SRG. --
94rain
Talk 02:35, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
reply
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Clerk endorsed - Please compare to previous socks and check for other accounts. Thanks,
GAB
gab 23:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
reply
Confirmed to previous socks. No other accounts seen. Blocked and tagged. You may want to consider requesting a global lock as others have been locked.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 01:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Lock requested, archiving.
Cabayi (
talk) 09:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
reply
10 January 2020
Suspected sockpuppets
See
zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#123Aristotle,some user said this three user's is 123A.
MCC214
#
ex umbra in solem 06:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
- zhwiki sysop has already blocked these accounts because they are the socks of 123Aristotle per
duck test. Secondly, Susan2019's editing behavior in enwiki is similar to the sock of 123Aristotle, such as
Ky2020 and
Hahaorz. Furthermore, I hope you guys can check the sleepers; and whether they have used the proxy or not so that the LTA page can be updated. Thank you. --
SCP
-20
00 12:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Behaviourally, they have no connection with the sockermaser based on en-wiki edit (two accounts had no edit at all). But viewing the editing of
Susan2019 in zh-wiki, yet seem another SPA for the deleted
AMTD Group article (the company may pass
WP:NCORP, just full of paid editor(s) to recreate it). Hire different person as paid editors, technically not a block evasion (as observed by change in tone in each recreated draft and article of the company in en-wiki), but seem blockable as blatantly paid editing.
Matthew hk (
talk) 18:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Two of the users have no edits here, and the third only a few. Insufficient evidence to take any action. Closing.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 18:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
06 January 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
Cross-wiki long-term covert advertising. Most of articles are of low or just no notability.
WP:CITEBOMB all the time with low-quality press releases and irrelevant sources.
To make themselves innocent, these accounts tend to write (or translate) a bunch of non-advertising
stubs about reservoirs, waterfalls, mountains, rivers, power stations, Chinese newspapers, etc,. consecutively.
On zhwiki, some of these accounts follow the same pattern: anonymous IP accounts create advertising articles; when such articles are nominated for deletion or marked as not meeting Notability, they remove deletion templates and/or vote for Keep in deletion discussions a few days later; IP accounts add more advertising words another a few days later. On enwiki, they never or seldom participate in discussions.
When warned for advertising, some of them tend to remove warnings selectively from their talk pages.
Some of these accounts have intersections with identified sockpuppets of 123A. And some have intersections with each other.
It takes some luck and coincidence to list them here. So it is predictable there are more unidentified active sockpuppets to be found.
-
DJ Qian(
Chinese: 钱德君) of which the Chinese version is
zh:钱德君.
- Created decades of non-advertising articles for rivers and Chinese magazines.
-
- from where Stella Phang (see meta SRCU below) also removed deletion templates (
Special:Diff/60741352) on July 24, 2020.
- Created decades of other non-advertising stubs on enwiki and zhwiki, for Chinese newspaper, magazines, historical Chinese political terms etc,.
-
Olight, which contains
WP:CITEBOMB, and was edited by 1989ChenKongkong1225 and Democracy Never Dies (see the meta SRCU below).
- Created a bunch of non-advertising articles for temples in China, Chinese traditional weapons, etc,.
-
HUION with similar CITEBOMB. The subject under the alternative name "Huion" has been deleted multiple times
[20] (seemingly involved with another PAID account DoratomGo
[21], which appears to be unrelated to 123A, active in viwiki ).
- Decades of non-advertising articles for waterfalls, corridors, rock paintings, plains, mountains, other geographical features mainly in China, historical Chinese political terms etc,.
Please also check those accounts (Magoroofu, Oortaorguus Swdy, 7.ESlebedie8.FREIHEIT, Stella Phang, Democracy Never Dies, 西范特斯卢克德马里, Roogérs.Joosé, Xogk-Frederick, Wentwentgogone, Sakiey, Sotonepheen, Otleiz) listed in
m:Steward_requests/Checkuser#[email protected]. (Do I need to list them one by one in CU templates here?)
虹易 (
talk) 14:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Added several newly found accounts.
虹易 (
talk) 09:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
AmandaNP, I noticed you CU blocked many of these accounts earlier today, but not XMJG. Was this account checked? The behaviour looks very similar to me. Thanks,
Spicy (
talk) 00:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Checked them now, they are related. --
Amanda
(aka DQ) 15:45, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
All non-stale accounts reported above have been CU-blocked and locked, plus:
The remaining accounts are stale. I'll also throw in
-
BigSétan (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki) - removed A7 on
Olight
[22], same mass creation of legitimate articles on Chinese magazines mixed with spam
[23], same distinctive article creation style (I don't want to spell out exactly what it is here, but it's easy to spot - admins, clerks and CUs can contact me off-wiki if they don't see it). I don't normally request to block stale accounts, but some of these accounts have remained dormant for a long time before reactivating (e.g.
[24]), the behavioural evidence is clear, and there is a lot of spam that ought to be G5d. Therefore,
Awaiting administrative action - please indef PQZZKYSOUSips, Hiarus Jrneoliuos, TimyReading, LyousAWN, KoNYofParking, and BigSétan. I do not think there is sufficient behavioural evidence to block 識時務者為俊傑 as they have no contribs on enwiki. This account would be better dealt with through zhwiki processes. Thanks to AmandaNP and 虹易 for their hard work on this filing.
Spicy (
talk) 21:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Blocking per
Spicy, leaving the tagging to you. --
RoySmith
(talk) 22:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Tagged as suspected,
Global lock(s) requested, closing. I'll go through the contribs of the newly blocked accounts and see if there's spam that's eligible for G5 (I did this for the other accounts already, but it's possible I missed things, so other eyes would be appreciated. I don't think there's any need to G5 the articles about temples, rivers, old newspapers, etc...) Thanks,
Spicy (
talk) 22:53, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Ugh, I don't know if the large number of entries blew spi-helper's mind, or if it was that my internet connection went down at just the wrong time, but I got a whole slew of javascript errors, and it looks like I accidentally stepped on many of the tags Amanda placed (for example,
Special:Diff/1064348957). I'll go back through my edit history and revert those. --
RoySmith
(talk) 23:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
- OK, I think I got everything back to where it should be. --
RoySmith
(talk) 23:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
21 February 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
These three accounts were created several months ago, but only began editing in January/February 2022, shortly after the blocks of a large group of socks from this farm
[25]. Each account made a number of minor edits to game ACPERM and then created fully-formed articles about likely-UPE topics in mainspace. See contribs
[26]
[27]
[28], article creations
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]. The behaviour is somewhat different from the
last batch of socks reported here, in that they don't also create articles about non-spammy topics to cover up their UPE activity. However, I believe these accounts are related to 123Aristotle based on the subject matter of their creations (brands with a presence in Asia - compare to known Aristotle123 creations such as
Barenbliss,
QCY (brand),
Olight,
Zepp (brand), etc.) and a number of idiosyncrasies in the way they create articles and the sources they cite, which I
don't want to disclose in public but can explain to CUs/clerks privately if it's not obvious.
Spicy (
talk) 21:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - for comparison to previous socks and a sleeper check, since the last check turned up a ridiculous number of them. Thanks,
Spicy (
talk) 21:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
-
In progress - --
RoySmith
(talk) 21:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Pizery is
Confirmed to Rockxd, but I can't connect them back to 123Aristotle in any way. There's some CU logs, and also some notes from several years ago on zhwiki, but nothing matches. XjeeW appears to be
Unrelated, but
Behavioural evidence needs evaluation --
RoySmith
(talk) 22:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
- I sent an email with some more behavioural evidence. Thanks,
Spicy (
talk) 17:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
- OK, the CU results aren't quite what I was expecting, but based on behaviour, I'm quite certain that these 3 accounts belong to the same operator and if they're not the same as previous 123Aristotle socks, they're at least
WP:MEAT for the same UPE operation. I'm happy to explain why privately if it's unclear, but there are a number of weird things going on here that I don't believe can be explained away as coincidences.
Awaiting administrative action - please indef Pizery, XjeeW and Rockxd as suspected socks of 123Aristotle, and Pizery and Rockxd as confirmed socks of each other (I can handle the tagging if you find it too annoying). Thanks,
Spicy (
talk) 01:42, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
Blocked but awaiting tags. --
Blablubbs (
talk) 01:46, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks. Tagged, closing. I'm not going to bother with locks for now as these accounts haven't been active on other wikis.
Spicy (
talk) 02:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
01 April 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
Making same edits as LTA
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/123Aristotle.
331dot (
talk) 13:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
I've blocked, but brought here for the record.
331dot (
talk) 13:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Closing.
Bbb23 (
talk) 20:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - I've re-opened this as I think a sleepers check might be worthwhile here given their history.
TheSandDoctor
Talk 16:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
-
In progress - --
RoySmith
(talk) 18:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The CU data says that Tavicocci is either
Unrelated or more likely
Inconclusive due to proxy use. Given the lack of any real baseline, I only made the most cursory of sleeper checks and didn't find anything. --
RoySmith
(talk) 18:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
reply