From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 2
March 4 >

March 3

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 3, 2020.

Technological measures

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 13:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC) reply

While technological protection measures unambiguously refers to DRM, the same cannot be said of technological measures or technical measures. Given the broadness of the terms, I would lean toward deletion at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 23:46, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sacha Killeya-Jones

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 03:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC) reply

No mention in the target article, has changed teams. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 21:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

William XI of Auvergne

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of rulers of Auvergne. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 05:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC) reply

William XI of Auvergne is not the same person as "William of Auvergne, bishop of Paris". Therefore, he should not be redirected to that page. Prosequor ( talk) 20:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

John. W. Brown

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 11#John. W. Brown

06/06/06

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Portal:Current events/2006 June 6. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 05:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Users searching for this sequence are more likely to be looking for the date June 6, 2006 than the Mark of the Beast. June 6 and 2006 are possible retargeting points, although it could be just deleted. Hog Farm ( talk) 19:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tnotb

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 15:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC) reply

This acronym is not exclusive to the target topic. Delete or retarget to a dab page. Hog Farm ( talk) 19:10, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. I can think of no suitable target. A searchbox search for "tnotb" turned up this redirect, and that was all. A Google search turned up a couple of hopelessly non- WP:RS entries in online dictionaries, but no evidence of actual usage except in a couple of social media references to "The Number of the Beast" (song). It can be assumed that anyone referring to the song in that way knows the title and is using shorthand (just as when I on some sites refer to HMHB or NB10; this is pure fanstuff). Narky Blert ( talk) 21:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - As stated above, this appears to be almost always used in reference to the heavy metal song. However, it's still rather an obscure fan thing. I agree. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 22:38, 4 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Apparently an accidental creation with an unneded parenthesis. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 17:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete as an implausible error ( D8). Glades12 ( talk) 17:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, useless with the extraneous punctuation. Hog Farm ( talk) 18:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Black Bruce Wayne

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target, or in discog., or in WP. Quick search finds speculation, but nothing tangible. Widefox; talk 17:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:WEASeL

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Seems to be an accidental creation with a lower case letter instead of an upper case one. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 16:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, useless with the extraneous punctuation. Hog Farm ( talk) 18:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. HigHly unliKely miscapiTalisation. Narky Blert ( talk) 21:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 19:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:R from incorrect punctuation

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 11#Template:R from incorrect punctuation

Triple-glazing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Seems to be a used spelling variant, closed as nom. (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 18:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Wrong hyphenation, Neelix. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 15:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep per WP:RCHEAP. We have double-glazing (which is also in Wiktionary) so it's difficult to argue that this is definitely wrong. 94.21.238.148 ( talk) 16:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep per WP:RCHEAP. A hyphen would be plausible here, redirects are sometimes made to capture plausible errors. Hog Farm ( talk) 18:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep per keepers. That's a search term I can see myself using (I'm not well-versed in hyphen fu). GirthSummit (blether) 19:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. If you've ever worked in a factory in Ontario in winter, you'll appreciate its value. Narky Blert ( talk) 21:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Snow keep. Struggling to see what's wrong with it. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 23:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Insulated glazes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 15:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC) reply

“insulated ice”? Wrong redirect by Neelix. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 15:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Keep Seems a reasonable search term/blue link for someone looking for the other article. -- Jayron 32 17:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete nonsense (although "glazes" is what a " glazier" does—i.e. to do with glass—but as a verb not modified by "insulated"). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 23:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Glaze (as a noun) is not the same as glazing. It often means a coating, including inter alia sugar coatings on doughnuts. Narky Blert ( talk) 12:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Glazes, glazed items, and the process of glazing are different subjects. Hog Farm ( talk) 14:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Double glazed glass

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 18:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Glazed glass? 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:55, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Keep seems a reasonable search term/blue link creation. -- Jayron 32 17:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete nonsense. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 23:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep. This is something of a pleonasm, but Google gives me a few search results from glaziers, particularly when "glass" is used to mean the complete fitting (e.g. "double glazed glass partition"). One could argue that double glazed window was redundant for the same reason. 85.238.91.68 ( talk) 13:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Despite being logically defective, the term is commonly used and has a reasonable chance to be searched for.North8000 ( talk) 14:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Though "double glazed window" is more commonly used, but glass is available in the market standalone. Crashed greek ( talk) 03:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Parque

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 18:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. Parks are not particularly Spanish or Portuguese, and the word is not used at the target. Created on 17 February this year, but not novel, obscure, a misnomer or typo, so I am not sure CSD is apt. 94.21.238.148 ( talk) 13:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Yes, that's better. Disambiguate per Tavix (scrubbed delete !vote as nom, IP has changed). I've drafted a DAB below the RfD notice. 85.238.91.68 ( talk) 06:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Disambiguate per Tavix. The draft seems better than the redirect. -- Soumyabrata ( talk • subpages) 12:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Disambiguate as above, the draft looks like a needed page. Narky Blert ( talk) 12:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

National Council of Women

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Highly misleading, result of a redirect done in 2006. There was such an organization in the 1900s in Australia also. Chris.sherlock ( talk) 13:14, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bertie Scott

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 15:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at the target; recently removed as a primary sourced single appearance on the label. Previously redirected to Bert Scott, but there's no mention there either and no source referring to the footballer under the nickname. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Retarget to the DAB page Bert Scott as WP:CHEAP, and tag as {{ R from ambiguous term}}. None of the people in the see-also on that DAB page seems to have been known as Bertie; but it's a very possible nickname for anyone christened Albert, Bert, Bertram, Herbert, or the like; for example, King George VI. Narky Blert ( talk) 17:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Retarget per bove. This was created as a redirect to Bert Scott. Boleyn ( talk) 18:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Conditional delete unless Narky Blert, Boleyn, or someone provides evidence that the footballer or anyone else notable has been called "Bertie Scott". My research showed overwhelming support for the musician as the primary topic for "Bertie Scott", but we no longer have anywhere to redirect this to. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this refers mainly to the Monstercat musician, and is not an assumed nickname for the other Bert Scotts. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:58, 20 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD ( talk) 19:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL ( talk) 10:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lingwa

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 11#Lingwa

Discount Beverage Outlet

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Given that the keep votes were phrased as "weak", I think that there's simply no consensus here, although the outcome is thus the same as if it had been kept. signed, Rosguill talk 18:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

This name is not mentioned in the target article, and is not exclusive to Circle K. Delete as ambiguous. Hog Farm ( talk) 05:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Comment to Hoggie: We can keep redirects as {{ R to article without mention}} when not mentioned in the target article. According to this webcast from the Town of Queen Creek in Arizona, Discount Beverage Outlet appears to be the trade name, or possibly former trade name, of the Circle K Stores, Inc., used only in the state of Arizona. It's not ambiguous because of the capitalization (i.e., Discount beverage outlet would be ambiguous) and because we don't have any other mentions on English Wikipedia. So, there would be a clear primary topic here. The question becomes, then, to me anyway, one of utility/usefulness per WP:R#D8. Doug Mehus T· C 12:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep per WP:R#K5 as it only had 7 pageviews for the preceding twelve months to February 23, 2020, two days before its nomination. However, it's harmless, and, potentially, useful. Doug Mehus T· C 12:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep - based on Doug Mehus' excellent research, this is a valid title and points unambiguously to the topic the reader is likely searching for, say if they encountered the name in a dead-tree publication old enough to use the former brand name. If good sources are available we could add it to the target article. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 17:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL ( talk) 09:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Leonard George Casley

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Leonard Casley. This could have been done WP:BOLDly as this is the obvious result. -- Tavix ( talk) 04:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

I would like to retarget to Leonard Casley, now there is a seperate article for his biography Clovermoss (talk) 03:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Speedy retarget to Leonard Casley, whose middle name was George. This hardly needs discussion. Narky Blert ( talk) 03:56, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_3&oldid=945223026"