June 16
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 16, 2016.
Paříži
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete both.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:RFOREIGN; the language I hit on was
Czech. --
Tavix (
talk) 20:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
URESWNI
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Delete as an
obscure acronym. Searching this acronym on Google only gives me ~60 results, and it's not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. --
Tavix (
talk) 20:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment As this redirect's creator I don't recall why I thought this would catch on. I'm a bit disappointed that URSWINE didn't take off either. /
edg
☺
☭ 04:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bản mẫu:Traffic law
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
We don't use Vietnamese namespace names on English Wikipedia.
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Axxter99/San religion navbox
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
We don't create subpages to the author's user name in the article namespace and redirect them to templates.
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Format: Reşiţa Demographics
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
We don't use Romanian namespace names on English Wikipedia.
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete error in transferring template from Romanian Wikipedia.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 00:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping.
Deryck
C. 21:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected typo: extra "s".
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tempate:Hong Kong Kwai Tsing Council Constituencies
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping.
Deryck
C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected typo: missing "l".
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Emplate:Current Top 10 WSA Rankings
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping.
Deryck
C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected typo: missing "t".
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template Dartford F.C.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping.
Deryck
C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected typo: missing colon.
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
United Kingdoom
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
While this is a misspelling, the use of the word "
doom" might be bordering on
WP:R#D3 territory due to it's negative connotations. --
Tavix (
talk) 20:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tempate:Duffy-Electric Railways
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping.
Deryck
C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected typo: missing "l".
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template Gribovsky aircraft
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping.
Deryck
C. 21:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected typo: missing colon.
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
HBWQ2016OG
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete unnecessary cross-namespace redirect and unlikely search term (Wikipedia-invented acronym for "HandBall Women's Qualifiers for the 2016 Olympic Games, in case you were wondering). Target could also use a rename, but that's a separate issue.
210.6.254.106 (
talk) 05:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Confusing mainspace redirect at worst,
WP:XNR at best.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Chief Justices of Commonwealth countries
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk) 15:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 20:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Not sure. The template is the closest we have to a "list of Chief Justice positions of Commonwealth countries". We also have
Chief Justice which includes a list. But one is an XNR and the other is not an exact topic match...
Deryck
C. 21:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. This is a viable topic for a standalone article, and hopefully a redlink will encourage article creation. --
Notecardforfree (
talk) 19:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep. In this case the template is the most useful target that we have for the searching user, so the cross namespace redirect is actually useful. If we really want an article, the closer should just copy the template, turn it into a list with the template at the bottom, and do a few wikifications. ----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:36, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete.
WP:XNR that probably qualifies for
WP:REDLINK.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Barry Bowden
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
This redirect must've been meant to link to a section on the player on that page (we use these pages to incubate biographies that are near but not yet notable per GNG). But there's nothing here on this individual as the
player has been inactive since 2010. There's no reason to keep this redirect. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 20:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Useless redirect for a former minor leaguer.
Penale52 (
talk) 01:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Stanford swimmer
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Delete This redirect title is too vague. There are dozens of notable Stanford swimmers; to make it be specifically about this subject is
WP:RECENTISM. There is already a redirect from "Stanford rapist", isn't that enough?
MelanieN (
talk) 18:52, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Stanford rapist is a BLP problem since the rape charges against Brock were dropped. Him being known as a swimmer is not controversial though.
Ranze (
talk) 00:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete (or re-target to
Stanford Cardinal) - highly recentistic.
Neutrality
talk 19:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep if you search this phrase it refers to this case. A dozen of our sources use this phrase to refer to Brock. No other swimmers from Stanford have this kind of notability associated with the phrase, try Googling it. If you know of anyone else knoen by the phrase well enough that is grounds for discussion of expanding into a disambiguation page but not deletion.
Ranze (
talk) 00:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete vague. Needs to be a more specific search like Stanford swimmer rape case. 02:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- bad logic, there is no rape case, the charges were quickly dropped.
Ranze (
talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. There are a number of famous Stanford alums who are well known for their accomplishments as swimmers (see, e.g.,
Tara Kirk,
Susan von der Lippe,
Mike Bruner, and
Greg Buckingham). If the Stanford swim team had an article, then we should redirect readers there; anything else will likely
WP:ASTONISH once this case is no longer front page news. --
Notecardforfree (
talk) 02:08, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- if at some point Brock is no longer the top result then I would be all for redirecting this to what is, or making it a disambiguation page, but that is no reason to empty the space.
Ranze (
talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom, not reasonable to assume this term must refer to the criminal.
Mercurywoodrose (
talk) 01:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- why not? He is the top result if you search. By your logic it would not be reasonable to assume "pulse nightclub" refers to the Orlando location. After all I could be talking about the one in Oshawa.
Ranze (
talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Europe/Luxembourg
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Consensus is that the current targets are inappropriate and that there is not an appropriate retargeting option available. I think it's
reasonable that this consensus
should apply to the other redirects currently at
Category:Redirects from a tzid, so those will be taken care of also. --
Tavix (
talk) 22:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
What a can of worms! First, I just came across "Europe/Luxembourg". I thought this would be a very old link that just meant
Luxembourg, but apparently it's a way of denoting a time zone. Now, with this notation, how does, say,
Europe/Oslo differ from
Europe/Amsterdam? And they from
Central European Time?
It got worse when I investigated the matter further. So far, I've only looked at the European members of
Category:Redirects from a tzid. Should these have their own articles, like the ones on Oslo and Amsterdam? Should they redirect to a list, like Zagreb does? Simply to the city they correspond to (I oppose this as unhelpful)? Relevant articles on time in that area? Or should we just delete the lot? --
BDD (
talk) 17:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment. Not sure right now, but either way, the nominated redirect seems eligible for
WP:G5.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- (
edit conflict) with me adding the additional entries. --
BDD (
talk) 18:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Looks like all but 3 of them may qualify for
WP:G5.
Europe/Andorra and
Europe/Zagreb were redirects created by the
ban-evading
sock that were converted to articles by a different editor, but were then reconverted to redirects.
Europe/Nicosia was created by a different editor than the ban-evading sock.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Name of Luxembourg
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 28#Name of Luxembourg
Buildings in Denmark timeline
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Jayme Mathias Rincão
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete most of the other managers are redlinked, it shouldn't redirect to the general template.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
April 27-30, 2014 tornado outbreak/Map
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. Either a file or a template, but not an article.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament - OQT Turin Group B table
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete all.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ademar Pimenta
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. Managers without articles should be redlinked or not linked.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Oklahoma City Barons roster
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#Oklahoma City Barons roster
April 27–30, 2014 tornado outbreak/Map
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Non-controversial maintenance to remove this page. ~
Cyclonebiskit (
chat) 19:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Animation industry in the People's Republic of China
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Chinese animation.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6. Could maybe be retargeted to
Chinese animation or something.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Anatomical terminology series
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk) 15:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
American University leaders
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Retarget to
List of American University people.
(non-admin closure)
Steel1943 (
talk) 13:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Al-Faisaly FC (Harmah) squad
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2016 in Chinese football
2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B3
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk) 15:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Note: I've merged similar discussions. --
Tavix (
talk) 01:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2015 Toyota Four Nations Cup Philippines men's basketball team roster
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk) 15:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2012 CECAFA Cup scorers
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Retarget to
2012 CECAFA Cup statistics.
(non-admin closure)
Steel1943 (
talk) 13:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6. {{
R with history}}, and retargeted in 2015.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2010-11 in Egyptian football
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2009 in Malaysian football
1996-97 Mid-American Conference men's basketball standings
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete all.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
See
WP:R#D6.
Stefan2 (
talk) 17:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Note: I've merged similar discussions. --
Tavix (
talk) 01:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete all per nom.—
Bagumba (
talk) 01:50, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#1974-75 in German football
Adios Mother
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was withdrawn/retarget to
Long Island Iced Tea#Variations.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
The subject of the redirect is not mentioned in the target article, so the connection is unclear.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep The section was deleted at some point. I added it back in. --
evrik (
talk) 17:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Works for me. I'm going to withdraw this.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Counter-Strike terms
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
It's unclear what "terms" refers to in the target article. The article has history as an article, but it seems to just be a list of
Internet slang.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. No glossary in the article. Not a slang list. Not a dictionary.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per above.
Prof. Mc (
talk) 12:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Counter-Strike culture
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
The redirect seems misleading since the subject of the redirect (as well as the word "culture") does not seem present in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but the history looks like annex sorry from
Pubnoob. (Also currently nominated for RfD.)
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Counter-smack
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
The term is not mentioned at the target. The redirect has history as an article, but the article looks like a combination of a
WP:NOTWIKIA fail and
Internet trolling.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Camper-strike
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Per search engines, the subject of this redirect seems like a parody video game created in 2005 based on the target in name alone. Either way, the redirect is not mentioned at the target.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- So,
Hoax, like
Counter-smack?
Prof. Mc (
talk) 22:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Someone should assess the (few) mentions in
[1] to verify whether the noun is interesting. My gut, without review (since I'm at work) is a weak delete (but not a speedy). --
Izno (
talk) 11:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as per above.
Prof. Mc (
talk) 12:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete not a slang dictionary for Counter-Strike.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Phoenix Connexion
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
The redirect seems to not be mentioned or identified in the target article.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:REDLINK. If it has any meaning, that might be lost to the depths of time, since
[2] returns nothing. --
Izno (
talk) 11:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Phoenix Connexion is one of the more memorable enemy models in the CS franchise
[3]. ----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 16:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Dust2
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but the article would probably fail
WP:NOTWIKIA.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Female Counter-Strike
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
It's unclear what this redirect is supposed to identify. So, is there a "
Male Counter-Strike"?
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pubnoob
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Redirect not mentioned in target article.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Counter-Strike Spray
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
The subject of the redirect seems to not be mentioned in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but it seems as though the article would fail
WP:NOTWIKIA.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I feel it necessary to point something out: There are two meanings to the word "spray" -- one as in the history of the article, and the other as in the in-game term which indicates an inability to control a continuously firing weapon. Both actually are
represented in reliable sources, so I'm leery to delete this one based on NOTWIKIA. Not mentioned in the article seems a legitimate deletion rationale for now, but I think there's potential there for at least one if not both to show up in that article or others in the family of articles. Weak keep. --
Izno (
talk) 11:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete-- it's either slang, as per @
Izno: or it's
WP:NOTWIKIA.
Prof. Mc (
talk) 12:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete non-notable game slang / kind of like a list of special moves.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Awp delay
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. Per the redirect's history as an article, it looks as though the article would have failed
WP:NOTWIKIA.
Steel1943 (
talk) 13:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
1996 Port Adelaide Magpies premiership players
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy delete per
WP:CSD#G6.
Jenks24 (
talk) 12:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
1996–97 Mid-American Conference men's basketball standings
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2014–15 European Rugby Challenge Cup Pool 1 table
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2014–15 NBL season by team
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 16:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2015 MLS Cup Playoff Bracket
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Retarget to
2015 MLS Cup Playoffs#Bracket.
(non-admin closure)
Steel1943 (
talk) 13:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Support the refined target of
2015 MLS Cup Playoffs#Bracket suggested by Tavix below. ----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B2
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 16:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bandy clubs from minor countries
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Confusing redirect. The target deals with bandy clubs from all countries, not just 'minor'
clarification needed countries.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. Nothing that qualifies what is a minor country. Is that even a term in that sport?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Antarctica in fiction
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Confusing cross-namespace redirect. I'd expect an article which discusses Antarctica, not a category.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete to create redlink; I can see this being a potentially interesting article. I should also note that we have an article called
Antarctica (novel). --
Notecardforfree (
talk) 02:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. If there's critical and literary analysis, an article can be created, but I'm afraid it will end up more like a bunch of lists, of which the Category will already cover.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Buccaneers2015DraftPicks
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Redirect to a template which seems to be related to
2015 NFL Draft. I wouldn't expect a cross-namespace redirect here. A redirect to the article namespace could maybe be expected, but I don't know where.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - the redirect is a result of a move that put the template into the correct namespace. There is no need for this redirect and there i sno viable target article. --
Whpq (
talk) 13:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete technical
WP:G6. Not a plausible search term.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as an implausible search term. --
Notecardforfree (
talk) 03:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Code of Honor 3: Desperate Measures
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
I don't see any connection between the redirect title and its target. It's possible that the redirect title is a game which was or will be published in the specified year, but the redirect isn't useful as the category page doesn't mention this. Tagged {{
R from move}}, but no page with this title has been moved to the category namespace. One page was moved to the draft namespace and later deleted, though.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete it's either a notable game or it's not. Not strongly tied to the year released.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Matterfall
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 28#Matterfall
Canadian electoral calendar, 2017
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was article created. Thanks to
117Avenue for doing the legwork. --
Tavix (
talk) 23:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected target. I'd expect a list article, like
Canadian electoral calendar, 2016.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:CRYSTALHAMMER. Calendar articles have gone out to this year. Wait until actual events can be added. Leave it redlinked as with
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/Archives.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Create article. People like to talk about future elections, might as well have a list of them. If you want to bring down the crystal hammer, take a whack at the future election articles. 2017 will happen, and there will be elections in that year.
117Avenue (
talk) 00:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Deletion at RfD doesn't prevent creation of an article with that title if someone has access to information to include in the article. --
Stefan2 (
talk) 23:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Does the RfD prevent me from creating it now? If I do, it wouldn't be a redirect anymore.
117Avenue (
talk) 03:09, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It does not. Go for it,
117Avenue. It shouldn't be too hard with previous year's articles as a template. Once that happens, this would be an obvious keep. ----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Canadian electoral calendar, 2018
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was article created by
117Avenue.
JohnCD (
talk) 11:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected target. I'd expect a list article, like
Canadian electoral calendar, 2016.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:CRYSTALHAMMER. Calendar articles have gone out to 2016. Leave it redlinked as with
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/Archives. Wait until actual events can be added.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Create article. People like to talk about future elections, might as well have a list of them. If you want to bring down the crystal hammer, take a whack at the future election articles. 2018 will happen, and there will be elections in that year.
117Avenue (
talk) 00:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Deletion at RfD doesn't prevent creation of an article with that title if someone has access to information to include in the article. --
Stefan2 (
talk) 23:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of A-League players
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep as a list. Any request for deletion should now go toAfD.
JohnCD (
talk) 11:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected redirect. I'd expect a list article under this title, not a redirect to a category. This used to be a list article before
this change.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --
BDD (
talk) 15:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I turned it back into a list, keep as out of scope, and take the list to
RFD AFD rather than deleting it by stealth please.
Siuenti (
talk) 21:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep the list as a list and remove the redirect.
Giant
Snowman 07:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect There's a lot of issues with this list and I'm not sure if it's notability. The issues I can see are it's not up to date (content hasn't been updated since 2013 or 2014). It's not ordered by family names. I just don't see what it adds when the category and player pages tells the same thing. --
SuperJew (
talk) 06:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment my thoughts as original creator of this list. This list has gotten to a point where it is too
long and out of date to ever be completed in its current form. There could/should be a page under this title which limits players included by a certain minimum number of A-League appearances obtained (see for example
List of Premier League players), pending decision as to what the appropriate number should be (no A-League player has 300 appearances (as is used in the Premier League list) yet) (200 seems appropriate to me (for now at least)). I don't think a redirect is helpful here.
Macosal (
talk) 09:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Currently, a list of over-200 caps players will be 12 players, which is 2 more than the
current table on the records page. Also I think that there's an issue that there aren't enough editors who will upkeep this. I can probably count on one hand the amount of editors currently active on A-League pages. --
SuperJew (
talk) 09:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- 12 right now, but likely to become over twenty within the next season (
WP:CRYSTAL, I know - but if there were, say 20 or more, would your view change?). Such a list would also contain more detail than the records page list does. I don't think upkeep is an issue here - at minimum, this list would only require one update per season (and I would be more than happy to take an active role in creating/updating this page more regularly than that). But I do agree with you that the low editor number is a consideration in favour of reducing the current list which is far too lengthy to be maintained.
Macosal (
talk) 09:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep list. If deletion is sought, it's now in the hands of AfD. ----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
AI accelerator
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was move
List of AI accelerators to this title.
JohnCD (
talk) 21:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unexpected target. I'd expect to find an article about accelerators under this title, not a category.
Stefan2 (
talk) 11:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- information on AI accelerators is thin on the ground at the minute. I was thinking of Movidius
VPU,
Zeroth NPU,
TrueNorth, google
TPU (which wasn't even announced when I made the link) - and there's probably more to come. I would certainly agree it would make sense to see an AI accelerator article. How about linking to a glossary def in
Glossary of computer hardware terms#AI accelerator? or what about a
List of AI accelerators page to bridge the gap? Also at the minute there is no consensus on the 'collective noun'; vendors are trying to claim the space as their own and pushing their own terms; indeed there *are* differences in how they operate, which are better described in specific implementations. It mirrors the evolution of graphics hardware, where there were many accelerators and eventually everyone adopted Nidia's
GPU as the "collective noun" (which originally, was a vendor-specific term). I think we should have a wikipedia article dealing with these accelerators under a neutral term before any one vendor claims the entire space. On another note, couldn't the wikimedia platform be extended to handle list-of/categories more seamlessly IMO when there is ambiguity about which to use it points to software features or options yet to be added.. I think glossaries,lists,categories could be unified, e.g. imagine if you had a 'micro article' template that specifies a trivial page is really intended to have its content added to a list, and if regular pages could also mark summary text). Such lists would then benefit from the ability of the software to sort (e.g. intersections)
Fmadd (
talk) 13:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to a mainspace page article if possible or delete. The creator has convinced me that this title qualifies for
WP:REDLINK. At the same time, maybe deleting the category should be investigated as well.
Steel1943 (
talk) 15:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Fmadd's recently created article should be AI accelerator. If it can be developed better with history of the term and have some examples instead of being a big list. Then
Category:AI accelerators can then use that as the parent article.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:33, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete It's a bad redir anyway, the page content was
#redirect [[Category:AI accelerators]]
and you can't make a redir to a cat page in that manner. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 22:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- i've fleshed out an prospective article for 'AI accelerators', which is currently sitting in the page
List of AI accelerators, this could be moved into 'AI accelerator'. Someone else suggested just making it a redlink
Fmadd (
talk) 22:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC).
reply
- Move "List of AI accelerators" to this page as suggested above. The topic appears notable. If another term becomes prevalent we can rename it.
Sizeofint (
talk) 23:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Move List of AI accelerators to this page over redirect, since it's been created. ----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
History of Indermark
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 21:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
A person has created the article and has repeatedly been reverted back to this redirect.
Indermark, the redirect target, is an infobox and one sentence. Any "history" material can go on Indermak.
Bgwhite (
talk) 06:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete stub article about a village has no history to warrant a separate article and/or a redirect.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hovito
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Seems like a
WP:PTM since Jay Z has a song called "Hola' Hovito." There's another minor use of "Hovito:" a tribe in Indiana Jones. I think
search results would be better here. --
Tavix (
talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. Non notable in itself. Is it a significant tribe in the Indiana Jones stories?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 03:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Formation (album)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 23#Formation (album)
BEONCE
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Delete.
WP:RCAPS combined with a typo makes this an
obscure redirect. --
Tavix (
talk) 05:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete redirect created by user whose only posts have been adding obscure and unsourced phrases about people with lots of spelling errors.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:19, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Eslovênia
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:RFOREIGN, the language I'm getting is Brazilian Portuguese. --
Tavix (
talk) 05:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Run the World Tour
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk) 00:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
User:Chasewc91 tagged this with R3, which I undid because this redirect was not recently created. However, I agree that it is not a plausible search term.
SST
flyer 04:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Beaded
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Bead (disambiguation). --
Tavix (
talk) 23:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Seems to be a bit of an
WP:XY situation between
Bead and
Beadwork. Either delete or retarget to Wiktionary (
wikt:beaded).
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment It's a coin toss. Beadwork involves more stitching and sewing, while there's beaded curtains, which are just curtains made of strings of beads.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 01:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Although it appears to be the situation in
WP:XY, that essay is misleading as usually disambiguation pages or hatnotes are used (if the title can refer to any of multiple topics), or the redirect is pointed at one of the possible targets (where the topics are closely related and easily accessible from each other, as is the case here), only being deleted when multiple topics are mentioned in the title of the redirect (as in all of the examples). This redirect is more likely to be used by people looking for the adjective rather than the verb, so
bead is a better redirect, but it may be better to disambiguate with
bead and
bead (woodworking) as the primary topic is less certain (either a separate disambiguation page or redirect to the existing one).
Beadwork could be added, but I don't know how likely it is; it hasn't been added to the
bead (disambiguation) page.
Peter James (
talk) 21:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget/disambiguate at
Bead (disambiguation).
Deryck
C. 15:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Tavix (
talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Big elvis
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Pete Vallee (and create
Big Elvis). --
Tavix (
talk) 23:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target article. Not finding any references of the redirect and the target having any citable connection. Unavoidable
WP:SURPRISE because ...
Elvis.
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I was about to essentially withdraw this discussion with the "retarget" suggestion above, but then I remembered a concern I found while looking up the term "Big Elvis" on search engines. Of course, almost all results were about
Elvis, so I wonder if this retarget would still cause a
WP:SURPRISE issue. Either way, I now support the retarget to
Pete Vallee option slightly over deletion.
Steel1943 (
talk) 04:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It could always be hatnoted to Elvis Presley since of course he's bigger than any Big Elvises.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 16:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Tavix (
talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wikipedia:Three month VfD policy
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus between deleting and retargeting to
Wikipedia:VfD renomination limits. This will default to retarget as the alternative to deletion since no one wants it kept as it. --
Tavix (
talk) 23:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Delete because it might cause confusion. The redirect was created in 2005, seemingly as part of a different policy discussion,
WP:GNAA votes for deletion policy (marked inactive) which is the only incoming link to this redirect. The current target does not discuss the matter. Relevant pages,
WP:Guide to deletion#Can I recreate an article that was deleted in the past?,
WP:CSD#G5 and
WP:Recreation of previously deleted pages, do not discuss three months and the latter is "failed" anyway. Sometimes a three-month waiting period is suggested (for example at DRV) but this is only on an ad hoc basis.
Thincat (
talk) 07:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget
Wikipedia:VfD renomination limits, whither the project page originally at this title was moved. VfD renomination limits also contains discussion on "three-month". In general, we should point deprecated or unadopted project-space titles pointing to relevant {{
historical}} project pages.
Deryck
C. 15:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Weak delete. I was originally going to suggest "retarget to
Wikipedia:VfD renomination limits" when I saw the redirect's edit history back on the day this redirect was nominated, but changed my mind after realizing how unhelpful that option would be for readers in "today's Wikipedia", given that the redirect's former target is a failed policy proposal for a
WP:XFD forum that technically no longer exists.
Steel1943 (
talk) 16:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Tavix (
talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Etre
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was withdrawn. --
Tavix (
talk) 23:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
This discussion established that it's not a good idea to redirect a french verb to an article on its conjugation. This originally targeted
Romance copula, is that a better target or is it best to delete it? --
Tavix (
talk) 04:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Note - they both actually target the section in
French conjugation where this verb is conjugated. Also note the discussion link seems to be broken, I'm guessing because of all the collapses on the page. If you click through and end up on the bottom of the page, scroll up a bit to the discussion on redirects from various verb conjugations.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk) 14:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - I think that discussion establised that it's not a good idea to redirect from the conjugated verb to an article on its conjugation, but these are both infinitive forms and match the section header at the article (
French conjugation#Être). I think that makes them okay. I also think we could hatnote to the essay from the section in the conjugation article, as see-also or related reading.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk) 14:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The infinitives were also deleted:
Vouloir,
Avoir,
Ouvrir, and
Pouvoir. (
Parler,
Partir, and
Avenir have other meanings). --
Tavix (
talk) 14:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Tavix (
talk) 01:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Stewart Parnell
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Peanut Corporation of America. --
Tavix (
talk) 22:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
I'm not entirely sure what to do with this one. This was created a redirect to
Peanut Corporation of America, as it is the name of one of the company's executives. A year and a half later, an IP retargeted it to its current target. There's absolutely no doubt that the Irish leader is primary topic over the peanut executive. But I don't think he was ever referred to solely by his middle and last names. A quick look at
"stewart parnell" suggests the peanut executive might be sufficiently notable for a standalone article. For now, I would say retarget to the original article,
Peanut Corporation of America, or delete.
BDD (
talk) 02:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Comment Charles Stewart Parnell is undoubtedly the primary topic here and his name is well known. I looked at Google and saw quite a few results about the peanut executive, but unless someone creates an article on the executive then I think it should stay as it is. If someone does create an article, then maybe a disambig page would be more appropriate.
st170e
talk 14:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Does he go by Stewart though? That determines whether it should be the primary topic. If he doesn't, then the peanut guy should get the redirect and then hatnote to Charles
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I've had a look through Google because I was convinced that some history books referred to him as Stewart Parnell, but in all the sources I've found on the news, Charles Stewart Parnell is always given his full name. Stewart Parnell has quite a lot of extensive coverage, albeit for all the wrong reasons so I think therefore that a retarget to
Peanut Corporation of America is plausible with a hatnote to CSP.
st170e
talk 22:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete to reveal search results for the reader.
Deryck
C. 15:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Tavix (
talk) 01:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2017 Malaysia FAM Cup
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.----
Patar knight -
chat/
contributions 04:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:CRYSTAL; there is no information about the 2017 event at the target article. --
Tavix (
talk) 01:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --
BDD (
talk) 15:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - lacking content, and per CRYSTAL.
Giant
Snowman 07:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
2017 Major League Baseball draft
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 21:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:CRYSTAL; there is no information about the 2017 event at the target article. --
Tavix (
talk) 00:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.