March 6
Whatsnew, Dogg, Innit, Lazyass → Slang
Specific slang terms redirecting to general article on slang. Specific terms are not mentioned in target article. Delete as pointless. Mike R ( talk) 16:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Neologisms that while examples of slang are unlikely to have the same linguistic meaning as slang in the foreseeable future. Would not object to dogg be retargeted to dog as a plausible misspelling. -- Allen3 talk 17:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Retarget Dogg to Dog; I think it's a reasonable search term. Delete the others, they don't pooint to anything useful, and I can't imagine anything useful for them to point to. — Gavia immer ( talk) 03:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Pointless redirects, except Dogg per above Lets drink Tea 20:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Retarget where possible, otherwise delete It is not useful to the general reader to redirect random examples of categories of word to that category.-- Rogerb67 ( talk) 23:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
lazy???? tf lol i've been on vacay thank you mofucka
List of templates → Wikipedia:Template messages
Inappropriate CNR, no history to preserve MBisanz talk 05:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. CNR's are not good for these types of pages. Versus22 talk 05:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Per CSD R2 Lets drink Tea 20:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Note: CSD R2 says "except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces.", so it does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion -- IRP ☎ 23:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete inappropriate cross-namespace redirect. -- Rogerb67 ( talk) 23:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: per nominator and User:Rogerb67. -- IRP ☎ 23:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Warnings vandalism → Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace
Inappropriate CNR that does not link to content, no history to preserve. MBisanz talk 05:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Otheruse → Wikipedia:Template messages/General
Improper CNR that does not link to content. MBisanz talk 05:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Wikistress → Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
Deletion: this is an unnecessary cross-namespace redirect and is not linked in many pages, or in important places (it's just linked on a few user talk pages and essays, and those links can be cleaned up rather easily. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 00:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. CNR's are not good for these types of pages. Versus22 talk 05:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Per CSD R2, also appears to be a Neologism Lets drink Tea 20:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete More appropriate as a neologism article, should the term become sufficiently notable (R2 does not apply to Wikipedia: namespace). -- Rogerb67 ( talk) 23:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
MOSDABRL → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Red links
Delete per
WP:SNOW. Non admin closure.
§hawn
poo 23:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete – Recently created cross-namespace redirect that saves the typing of one colon (over MOS:DABRL). Poor cost-benefit ratio. Rogerb67 ( talk) 00:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete little usefulness, nothing linking there. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 00:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. CNR's are not good for these types of pages. Versus22 talk 05:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Per CSD R2 Lets drink Tea 20:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per the nom. MOS:DABRL alreadys takes care of this. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 04:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Heh, I remember created the MOS:DABRL shortcut a while back. Tavix (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It presently has few links, and perpetuates bad habits among new editors. + m t 16:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and for setting a bad precedent. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 19:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)