Social policies of Phyllis Schlafly

Social policies of Phyllis Schlafly (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Majority of article comes from WP:PRIMARY sources. Relevant info can be merged into Phyllis_Schlafly#Viewpoints but there isn't enough to justify its own article. मल्ल ( talk) 14:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism and Politics. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• delete - no independent reliable sources for the subject. - Altenmann >talk 19:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment I see a number of books listed as references, Feminism and the New Right and such. These are all primary sources? I wouldn't think that the political policies of one activist would merit an article separate from the article about that person, but if people have seen fit to write this much about them... It looks like the issue is notability. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 20:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Ossanda Liber

Ossanda Liber (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I know it has only been two months since the last nomination but that ended as no consensus, which was not an endorsement of notability. There has been another nationwide election since then and this candidate is still getting under 0.5%. There are sources about her, yes, but they're mainly discussing her candidacies and are part of a WP:ROUTINE coverage expected in a democracy. Some other parties are mainly based around the founder, such as Vox and Chega, but those parties have hundreds of other office holders and the founders have their own individual notability as office holders and nationally recognisable figures. Apart from being an unsuccessful candidate, what can be said about Liber that isn't about her party? The page used to have information about education and children, which I removed as unsourced per BLP. I also removed the blow-by-blow of setting up a political party, as that's obviously more about the organisation than about her. But the thing is, would we ever need to know personal information about someone this notable? I saw the comment before that Liber is notable as a founder and leader of a political party, but in a democracy it's reasonably easy to set up a party, and extremely easy to be the leader of your own party. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 16:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Comment: Liber's electoral history: 2021 Lisbon local election (0.36%), 2022 national election (voters in other European countries constituency) (0.08%), 2024 national election (Lisbon constituency) (0.18%), 2024 European election (0.18%). Not sure at which point someone becomes notable the hard way, like Bill Boaks. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 16:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Tagging all previous commenters: AusLondonder Moondragon21 PamD SportingFlyer BlakeIsHereStudios Prima.Vera.Paula Unknown Temptation ( talk) 16:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment - I translated this article into English from Portuguese as part of Women in Red. This page could potentially be merged into Nova Direita as it is considerably larger. 18:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Conservatism, Angola, France, and Portugal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete We do not keep articles on failed political candidates for a variety of different reasons under WP:NOT, and she's not notable for being the leader of a very small political party either. It's not impossible she'll be notable in the future, but at the moment I think this is an easy delete. SportingFlyer T· C 19:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Merge to Nova Direita - there isn't enough coverage to justify a separate article, a slightly-longer description of her in the party's article is sufficient. Not impossible this would change in the future. Walsh90210 ( talk) 19:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Redirect and merge to Nova Direita: That way the page info would be stored in the redirect's history and a portion of the content could be placed in a section in the Nova Direita article. Prima.Vera.Paula ( talk) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply