"In March 2024, antifascist internet vigilantes claimed to have revealed the identity of StoneToss using leaked information from Gab, a social media website with a far-right userbase".
Should the wording "revealed the identity of" be replaced with "doxxed"?
If so, should the section heading be modified? TarnishedPathtalk 13:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Should the following sentence be included after the heading Deployments in Peacekeeping Missions:
Sri Lankan peacekeepers have been embroiled in a child sex ring scandal in Haiti, with at least 134 soldiers being accused of sexually abusing nine children from 2004 to 2007.[1]
Currently the The Zone of Interest section of this article takes up 7,261 bytes out the total 33,918 bytes of the whole article making it the largest section of the whole article. Refer to
Special:Diff/1214424815 for current size of the section at time of writing this RfC.
Should the whole section, inclusive of any subsections and quotes, be trimmed so that it is no larger than half its current size? TarnishedPathtalk 02:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Following his inquiry, Justice Sansoni submitted his report, which was known as the "Sansoni Report" to President Jayewardene in July 1980.[2] The riots were explained in the Sansoni Report in terms of "Sinhalese reaction to Tamil separatist demands, terrorist acts committed in the name of separatism, and anti-Sinhalese statements allegedly made by Tamil politicians in the course of the 1977 general election campaign".[3] The Sansoni Report has been criticized for pro-government bias,[4][5][6][7] being hampered by political interference[8][9][10] and for "
victim blaming" Tamils.[11]
One editor wants the last paragraph to be changed to the following, as he believes both the Kearney and Manogaran sources have "accepted" the reasons attributed by Sansoni for the riots, whereas other editors believe that those sources are merely summarising Sansoni's reasons, and are not personal approvals. Do you agree with the proposed change below?
Following his inquiry, Justice Sansoni submitted his report, which was known as the "Sansoni Report" to President Jayewardene in July 1980.[2]
Over the years the Sansoni Report has been recived diffrent reviews. Robert N. Kearney found that the Sansoni Report explained the riots in terms of "Sinhalese reaction to Tamil separatist demands, terrorist acts committed in the name of separatism, and anti-Sinhalese statements allegedly made by Tamil politicians in the course of the 1977 general election campaign".[3] According to Chelvadurai Manogaran, the Sansoni Report attributed many factors as the cause of the riots, including "TULFs anti-Sinhalese proganda advocating separatism, Sinhalese extremists' statements claiming that Tamils intended to wipe out the Sinhalese and acts of violence committed by the liberation Tigers". The immediate cause of the violence Manogaran finds is rumor of Sinhalese policemen been attacked in Jaffna by Tamil militants. He further states that due to the violance (in Augest 1977) and events that followed many Tamils both extreme and moderate were convinced the need to establish a separate state[12]
The first sentence of the section on alleged war crimes in the Sri Lankan Civil War currently reads:
The Armed Forces along with the LTTE have been accused of committing war crimes during the war, particularly during the final stages. A panel of experts appointed by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to advise him on the issue of accountability with regard to any alleged violations of international human rights and humanitarian law during the final stages of the civil war found "credible allegations" which, if proven, indicated that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed by the Sri Lankan Armed Forces and the LTTE, with most civilian casualties in the final phases of the war being blamed on Sri Lankan Army shelling, with the LTTE preventing the civilian from leaving as they used them as human shields and attempted to create an humanitarian crises.
Should the last phrase read:
Awith most civilian casualties in the final phases of the war being blamed on indiscriminate Sri Lankan Army shelling and the LTTE being blamed for using civilians as a human buffer.
OR
Bwith the LTTE accused of significantly adding to the death toll in the final stages of the war, by using civilians as a human buffer and shooting civilians attempting to escape the conflict zone.
Should
Belarus be listed in the infobox, and accordingly described in other parts of the article concerning the
events since 24 January 2024: (a). no (as at present); (b) as supported by; (c) as a co-belligerent; (d) without qualification?
Criterion #4: Nomination from a major party only. Third-party candidates shouldn't be listed.
Criterion #5: If the candidate holds political beliefs that are non-fringe, mainstream, and polls above a certain percentage. (Whether 1%, 5%, 10%, and 15%.)
Criterion #6: Having
ballot access in states that comprise 270
electoral votesand meets criteria #1a, #1b, or #1c.
Criterion #7: Another criterion not listed or a requirement that they fulfill multiple criteria of the above. (Explain how and why.)
The results of this RFC should not be interpreted as
WP: PRECEDENT outside of this article.
KlayCax (
talk) 06:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Should elections include equal-ranked and truncated ballots when calculating vote shares? For example, should ballots marked A = B > C be included in calculating the vote share for A against B?
Question 1: Should the incumbent parameter in the Infobox state (A) "David Cameron" or (B) "Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton"?
Question 2: Should the opening sentence of the fourth paragraph of the lead section state "The current foreign secretary is..." (A) "David Cameron" or (B) "Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton"? -
The Gnome (
talk) 19:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Previous RSN Discussion:
February 2021(Considered generally reliable) &
October 2021 (Considered generally reliable)
For some background,
OKO.press is mentioned or cited on 129 articles across English Wikipedia. After a talk page discussion on
Visegrád 24, it was mentioned that the source may not be reliable. Given this source is cited in CTOPS articles (including
Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, LGBTQ articles, and Israel-Hamas war articles), an RFC is needed to reassess reliability. The
Weather Event Writer (
Talk Page) 23:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
I feel like using photography published and distributed by the IDF from their Flickr is not really the purpose of Wikipedia and does not really feel NPOV to me - what do other Wikipedians think about removing these images and replacing them with other creative commons images?
LegalSmeagolian (
talk) 20:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a
talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{
rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.