I tried to nominate the fourth season's page for good article status, but it was failed within a few minutes because it will not begin airing until February, however it is worth noting that the page has 79 citations. Thanks to the other editors of the
Lost WikiProject, including
Scorpion0422 who wrote and nominated the first season's page and
Wikipedical who nominated the main page. Self-nominate –thedemonhogtalk •
edits • box 03:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Support, with an attachment. As of this moment, I believe it is of featured topic status. However, parts are bound to change as more episodes are aired. So, I think this should get a preemptive requirement to maintain/improve the topic. For example, Season 4 would be required to be of FL status by January 1, 2009 (similar to how current FT's that do not meet the requirements are given until the beginning of 2008).
Hurricanehink (
talk) 03:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
I think that we will be able to get season 4 to FL status by May. –thedemonhogtalk •
edits • box 03:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
If you'd want to push the date up, to like July 1, 2008 (half-way point in the year), that'd be cool.
Hurricanehink (
talk) 04:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment I believe that season 4 is excuseable because it will never reach GA or FL status (at the moment) due to the instability of the page, and I do believe that certain pages can be excused for reasons like that. As well, for those who don't like the title, we are open to changing it. --
Scorpion0422 03:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. Why doesn't this nomination include the main Lost page? I understand you are focusing on episodes, but I think you can certainly include the show in the topic about its episodes. Especially because it is of Featured quality. --
Wikipedical 04:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
The main Lost article seems like it would be better as the main page for a topic that would include the
DVD and
music articles. –thedemonhogtalk •
edits 04:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
In the talks about the topics for artists and their albums, we decided that a topic does not have to contain a "higher level" article than the main article. This topic falls within existing rules as a topic of lists, and the main
Lost article does not have to be included. If
Lost became a main article of a topic, that topic would include
List of Lost episodes, as well as articles about the characters, themes, etc. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs) 15:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - It can be a featured topic with the understanding that the 4th season can have a check mark until the season is complete, and then it has to be featured not long after.
Judgesurreal777 18:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)reply
There is a clause in
criteria which says that "Items that cannot achieve a high rating due to their limited subject matter have passed an individual audit for quality." The checkmark means that the article has been reviewed and consensus has been reached that it is an acceptable short article. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs) 02:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Support My only problem was that the plot summaries were unreferenced but I've added episode citations. An excellently covered topic, congratulations on the articles.--
Opark 77 12:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Support. Meets the FT guidelines. --
Wikipedical 00:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Its all good.
Gran2 20:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Support great job. And after improving the DVD and music ones, add them along with the main Lost article.
igordebraga≠ 22:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong Support per above, fantastic job!
SergeantBolt 20:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)reply