New championship created in July, seems to be sticking around so it should be added. At the moment, the list portion is too small to sustain it's own article, so it is included in the main championship page. Meanwhile, that one is too small to become a GA.
Defunct championship, deactivated at the beginning of the year and doesn't seem to be coming back any time soon, so it doesn't belong in the topic since it's definition is active championships only. --
Scorpion0422 00:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Support removal of
List of WWE Cruiserweight Champions, oppose addition of
WWE Divas Championship. I'm far from convinced
WWE Divas Championship is too small to get GA, but at any rate, adding an article in place of a list which is too short to get FL is unprecedented, and I am unsure whether or not that is the best course of action -
rst20xx (
talk) 21:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)reply
I was prepared for this, and I have created a
List of WWE Divas Champions. Since it is largely a recreation of the WWE Divas Championship article, it has already been peer reviewed. Is this acceptable? --
Scorpion0422 21:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Y-es, I suppose. Though you need to update
Template:WWE Championships. Out of interest, what non-current WWE titles are there?
rst20xx (
talk) 22:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Support both changes.--SRX 21:50, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Support both, the Crusierweight Championship is no longer active so it should be removed. The Diva's Championship has been properly reviewed.
Nikki♥311 05:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote -
rst20xx (
talk) 17:20, 22 December 2008 (UTC)reply