The article was kept by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 8:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC) [1].
FAR notice was given by Sandy Georgia on 23 January, stating that "This 2008 FA promotion has numerous areas not in compliance with WP:WIAFA, including uncited text, WP:MOS issues, and possible breach of WP:NOTPRICE". Since there have not been efforts to bring the article up to FA criteria, I am nominating it for FAR. b uidh e 05:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Spotchecks
The article relies rather heavily on offline sources (news articles) which I am not able to consult. Eisfbnore (会話) 14:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Buidhe could you please update? I am not seeing serious outstanding issues, and think we should have a list. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 17:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note to Coords: I tagged the talk page for examination, but I did not nominate to FAR. No one yet has really provided a good reason for the FAR. I suggest that, in the absence of such, a procedural close might be needed. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 8:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC) [2].
This is a 2007 promotion whose original nominator is hardly active any more. I noticed the talk page over two months ago, but nothing has happened. There is quite a bit of uncited text, a MOS review is needed (I noticed WP:PUNC, MOS:CAPTIONS and WP:DASH, MOS:ALLCAPS), and there are incomplete citations (missing publisher, etc.) SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Find bruce this article needs significant citation work, and too much is cited to Garran himself. Best regards, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the detailed feedback SandyGeorgia both here and in the article. I will work through those & see what else I can do to bring it up to current standards. -- Find bruce ( talk) 08:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Sandy, given Find bruce's subsequent edits, do you still feel FARC is appropriate? Nikkimaria ( talk) 15:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 0:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC) [3].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it was highlighed as not meeting the FA criteria more than 4 months ago [4] and there have not been significant improvements since. b uidh e 02:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The recurring lack of citations in this article is unacceptable. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 01:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC) —— Serial # reply
Lead
The lead image is very high quality and high encyclopedic value. It could be a featured picture. ( t · c) buidhe 05:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 8:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC) [5].
This is a 2007 promotion that is in need of a tuneup. There is considerable uncited text and un underdeveloped lead. In terms of MOS, there is incorrect use of bolding throughout, WP:BADITALICS (of foreign language proper nouns), and MOS:SANDWICH. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Casliber via FACBot ( talk) 4:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC) [6].
I am nominating this featured article for review because this is a promotion from 2007 and does not meet the current criteria. I put a notice on its talkpage a couple of weeks ago and no work has been done on it since then except for some minor tweaks by me. (In all fairness I overstated the amount of time between the talkpage notice and FAR process, but I ultimately think that it is immaterial to this review.)
Here are some issues:
This is ultimately a piece of work to bring back to modern FA standards; hopefully someone dedicated from the Skyscraper and/or Chicago projects is willing to put in the effort. – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 00:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Casliber via FACBot ( talk) 2:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC) [7].
These issues have yet be addressed, so here we are. ( t · c) buidhe 17:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC) replycareless and inconsistent ref formatting, with both shortened footnotes and long ones intertwined. It relies rather heavily on a single web page, which I can't access, owing to its lack of proper sertificate for privacy. Is it a HQRS? And is our copy sufficiently paraphrased? We need better sourcing than what we've got here: IMDb and Publicystyka Antysocjalistycznego Mazowsza are not HQRS. We also have a See also farm and an EL farm. It is also not particularly well written with repetitive lines like […]he was not breaking any laws. He pleaded guilty to the other charges. He was sentenced to death on 15 May with three of his comrades, and he was executed and noun + -ing, -ing, -ing He was also a vigorous advocate of rural development, founding an agricultural cooperative, heading the local fire brigade and also serving as chairman of a local milk-processing plant built in the district