Remove: Incomplete without the latest entry. -
Bryan Rutherford (
talk) 13:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Changing to support addition with Engage promoted. Good save! -
Bryan Rutherford (
talk) 12:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)reply
@
QuicoleJR: Do you think you'll get a chance to work on Engage soon? You said you were interested awhile back, but it's fine if it fell through the cracks. If you don't think you're going to get to it, mind if I take a look at getting the article to GA?
SnowFire (
talk) 00:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I'd be fine with you giving it a go. I'll try to help a bit, but it's not really my current priority.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 00:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Hold to give SnowFire a chance.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 12:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I've nominated Engage for GA. We'll see if it passes.
SnowFire (
talk) 21:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Engage passed GA recently; thanks to
User:Cukie Gherkin for the review. I've updated the template to include Engage. @
Armbrust:.
SnowFire (
talk) 18:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep, all articles under this umbrella are GAs. -
Cukie Gherkin (
talk) 18:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Fails criterion 3.b as
God of War Ragnarök is not a
WP:GA, isn't being worked on, and is past the three month grace period (game was released on 9 November 2022)).ArmbrustTheHomunculus 22:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Delist per nom. Obviously, this can be renominated if Ragnarök is brought to GA.
JOEBRO64 00:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Remove: Incomplete without the latest title. -
Bryan Rutherford (
talk) 01:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Pausing vote now that the missing title is nominated at GAN. -
Bryan Rutherford (
talk) 23:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Withdraw my vote since there is a pending GAN. I will wait for its outcome
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk) 19:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: The notion that God of War Ragnarök "isn't being worked on" was false, but with that being said, the article is currently up for GAN. --
JDC808♫ 03:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
@
JDC808: Well, at the time this removal candidate started there really wasn't that much editing to the article that would indicate it being worked on.
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 17:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Wait until Ragnarök's GAN has run its course.
DecafPotato (
talk) 01:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Hold to let the GA nomination finish.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 18:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Hold for the GA nomination. It's good to see this being worked on.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 03:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Hold until the Ragnarök GAN is completed.
-- Zoo (
talk) 19:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep and add Ragnarök now that it has become a GA -- ZooBlazertalk 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Final Fantasy XIII for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
The articles in this topic were slowly but surely built up by myself and
PresN, and when I did the previous additional nomination in 2014, I assumed that would be that. But after some initial resistance and questioning from editors (including me),
Kung Fu Man has done what I thought was impossible and both created and brought successfully to GA an article for the character Vanille.
Given recent trends in limiting the creation of fictional character articles, it's unlikely there will be any other additions to this topic. I trust this will either be the last addition to this topic, or the last for a long while. --
ProtoDrake (
talk) 10:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)reply
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/M.I.A. albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Support: Not sure if BrooklynVegan and Hypebeast are reliable sources.
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk) 13:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
@
MarioSoulTruthFan: - I moved the above comment here as it was inadvertantly placed on the main FTC page itself. I need to log off now but will respond to it tomorrow --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 21:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
@
MarioSoulTruthFan: - Hypebeast replaced. Per
this, BrooklynVegan has a multi-person editorial staff so seems OK as a source to me.... --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 09:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Support, but wondering why this process is necessary. Aren't these articles self-evidently part of the same topic as the others? —
Amakuru (
talk) 14:57, 26 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Support as a straightforward addition of the latest entries. -
Bryan Rutherford (
talk) 21:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Support but I also echo
Amakuru's thoughts. Not sure this is necessary given they're obviously part of the topic, and this will need to be repeated every year the final is played.
NapHit (
talk) 19:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Yeah, if the letter of the process says that a discussion is always needed, then I feel like some extra clause would be useful saying that for
WP:Sky is blue type situations, where new articles come along that are GA/FA and also indisputably part of the series, such that nobody would ever think otherwise, then they are simluy added directly without discussion. —
Amakuru (
talk) 21:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)reply
On 20 January 2023 a new champion,
Rocky Romero, was crowned. As it's already a GA, it can be added to the topic immediately. Regards,
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 18:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Add: Looks like a straightforward addition of the latest title holder. -
Bryan Rutherford (
talk) 17:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)reply