Total_Miner – Endorse. Subject does not yet have the required sources for a stand-alone article. Opinion seems to be that if better sources appear in the future, just go ahead and recreate this (or ask for the deleted text to be userfied as a starting point) and if people still don't like it, they can take it to
WP:AfD. – --
RoySmith(talk) 20:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The following is an archived debate of the
deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
The game was recently released on Steam, has an active following and is in constant development. It is one of the best selling XBLIG of all time, just like FortressCraft and Castle Miner. Both of those games still have their own articles, and are equally notable to Total Miner. The article should be reinstated and not a redirect to Minecraft.
86.150.18.203 (
talk) 19:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Any
WP:VGRS discussing this game in depth? The deletion was a few months ago so it's not inconceivable that it is now notable.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 19:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Metacritic is saying no critic reviews as of yet, google news saying no news. Based upon that an endorse is the only appropriate outcome for this DRV - it doesn't look notable now it has been released let alone two months before release. If the article is recreated we can just look at any refs and notability at that time in an AFD. The article history can be offered for a userpage now if there is an interested editor, I can't see much happening with this unless it grows substantially but sandbox games occasionally do.
Szzuk (
talk) 20:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Endorse. Not ready for an article yet, wait for the sources.
Stifle (
talk) 11:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is an archive of the
deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
F%CK THE HATERS – No Consensus. Maybe sending this to
WP:RFD would have been better than
WP:CSD, but at this point, it's gotten about as much discussion as it would have on RFD, so I'll take this as essentially endorsing the deletion. – --
RoySmith(talk) 15:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The following is an archived debate of the
deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
"
Gummo" is on the album F%CK THE HATERS by American musician
6ix9ine.
Jax 0677 (
talk) 15:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
If
Gummo (song) had mentioned that at the time this was deleted (or even if it mentioned it now), it probably wouldn't have been. —
Cryptic 15:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Reply - I mentioned on the talk page, that this term can be redirected to
6ix9ine. --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 15:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
I've temp undeleted the talk page. If what
User:Ss112 says there is true, then this shouldn't point at
6ix9ine either, nor should that article mention this. Either way, I would've sent this to
WP:RFD instead of speedying it. —
Cryptic 15:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Jax, a random person on the Internet trying to make a name for themselves called "DJ Get It Rite" compiled a "mixtape" on
DatPiff with "Gummo" on it. It's not from
6ix9ine at all. No other reliable search results show up for it aside from more uploads of this fanmade compilation. If it were official, there'd be something. Ss112 15:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is an archive of the
deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
The page was deleted for being created by a banned user evading their ban however the page was not created by a user banned at the time of the articles creation. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Frank Schneider1972 (
talk •
contribs) 11:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is an archive of the
deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.