From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to India. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|India|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions ( prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to India. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{ transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{ prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

India

Battle of Devarakonda

Battle of Devarakonda (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find a single reliable source mentioning a battle called the "Battle of Devarkonda." This makes it clear that the article is fabricated. It was created and modified by socks who were disrupting articles related to Indian military conflicts. The article lacks notability, and no sources cover this conflict in detail or refer to it as the "Battle of Devarkonda." Created by socks/continuous disruptors for self pleasure. Imperial [AFCND] 09:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and India. Imperial [AFCND] 09:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • comment- The repeated mentioning of "Muslim" in the lead itself is enough to identify the the target of the creator (ofcourse, the user is blocked). Imperial [AFCND] 09:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Mccapra ( talk) 09:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as unsourced. — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong) 10:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Being unsourced is a not a reason for deletion because it can be fixed through editing. In this case, however, notability does not appear to be established. C F A 💬 15:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: I don't think this is a hoax. It is briefly mentioned in some pages online, like this blog/article. Regardless, it certainly doesn't meet WP:NMIL with this little coverage. C F A 💬 15:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Clearfrienda We have seen numerous unreliable sources that discuss rewritten and inaccurate history, often contradicting well-established sources. I do not consider those blogs and write-ups to be credible, especially since such biased South Asian blogs are widely available online. The site linked above itself contains praise and many biased writings. Imperial [AFCND] 16:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep. Source by Dr. M.A. Haque, lecturer in history, Regional college of Education, Bhubaneswar, Orissa on page 33 talks about the battle at Devarakonda. Page needs to be fixed with background where Bahamanis sieged Devarakonda. More reliable sources will be helpful. 2 other sources, I was not able to verify. RangersRus ( talk) 16:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Bhubaneswar Club

Bhubaneswar Club (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On its face, it fails WP:NORG. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Border 2 (film)

Border 2 (film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Planned film that does not satisfy film notability guidelines or general notability, and in particular does not satisfy future film notability guidelines. Unreleased films are only notable if production, that is, principal photography, has begun, and production itself is notable. This film has only been announced. The four references are all nearly the same, simply announcements that the director plans to make the film.

Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary
1 India Today Announcement of plan of film Yes No. Future existence is not significant coverage. Yes No
2 NDTV.com Announcement of plan for film Yes No. Future existence is not significant coverage. Yes No
3 Indian Express Announcement of plan for film Yes No. Future existence is not significant coverage. Yes No
4 Times of India Announcement of film, with discussion Yes No, even if somewhat more detailed. No No

This stub does not speak for itself, and there is nothing here that approaches significant coverage of a film or its production.

  • Draftify as nominator. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Draftify: Checked for in-depth coverage, but I can't find any. These sources are just announcements, release date but not significant coverage. Additionally, the shooting of the film has not yet started. The film obviously fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The first part of the film was very famous in India, so it will surely get more coverage in the future and will meet notability, but it is currently not ready for mainspace. GrabUp - Talk 19:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Border (1997 film)#Sequels - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Draftify. WP:TOOSOON. Just announcements and the film has not begin production. It needs to pass post production stage for a warranted page. RangersRus ( talk) 16:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Meridean Overseas Education

Meridean Overseas Education (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this article fails WP:NCORP. Most sources are based on PR releases, thus inherently not independent. Churnalism. It is likely that this is a result of WP:UPE as the creator Zehnasheen has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion. A dime a dozen edutech company. Recommend deletion. Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 18:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

List of Zubeen Garg live performances

AfDs for this article:
List of Zubeen Garg live performances (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the addition of subsequent live performances since the deleted version keeps this from being a G4, Discographymen essentially created the same article that was deleted. The factors that led to the deletion do not appear to have changed as there's no indication the performances were notable. While I would not be opposed to a redirect (protected, to stop re-creation) I am opposed to a merge as this information isn't encyclopedic in addition to not being notable. Star Mississippi 17:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I understand your concern. Give me some time to reconstruct the article with better citations and removing social media links. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you. Discographymen ( talk) 20:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I would not even consider merge to Zubeen_Garg#Discography because of how poorly sourced the page is for all performances. Most of the sources are Twitter and blogs from a quick Overlook. Page fails WP:GNG. RangersRus ( talk) 16:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Bhilwara Kings

Bhilwara Kings (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricket team taking part in matches not having official T20 status. Couldn't find independent coverage about the team, to pass wider requirements of WP:NORG and WP:GNG. The highest to SIGCOV are the sources which says about the announcement of the teams, launch of jersey by the team owners- with all of these belonging to WP:ROUTINE. RoboCric Let's chat 07:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Southern Super Stars

Southern Super Stars (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricket team taking part in matches not having official T20 status. Couldn't find independent coverage about the team, to pass wider requirements of WP:NORG and WP:GNG. The highest to SIGCOV are the sources which says about the announcement of the teams, launch of jersey by the team owners- with all of these belonging to WP:ROUTINE. RoboCric Let's chat 07:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Grrr (2024 film)

Grrr (2024 film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftify. Movie not presently notable. Coverage consists of press releases, WP:CHURNALISM press releases, and release date coverage. microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 13:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC) Withdrawn. microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 12:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - There is nothing in this article that addresses either general notability or film notability. This article does not speak for itself, and there is no mention of significant coverage. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Yes there is and plenty of coverage exists....Not sure why we're here. The page was improved but nominators (and in my view, Delete !voters too) should check existing sources before voting. Inviting you to kindly reconsider your !vote. Best, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    User:Mushy Yank - In my opinion, the burden of checking for sources is on article authors even before it is on nominators. Article authors should wait until the sources exist before moving the article into article space in the expectation that there will be reviews. A film article with no reviews is a film article that should have stayed in draft space or user space until the reviews were published. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    To explain: Not sure why we're here. We are here because the article author wrote an article with no Reception section. That is why we are here. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    No comment. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Reviews in The Week, and The Hindu would be enough to keep this. And there's more coverage (including OTHER REVIEWS in South First, Tribune, Onmanorama, The News Minute, Times Now)... So non-notable, how, why? This meets GNG and NFILM. A redirect to List of Malayalam films of 2024 should have been considered anyway before nomination as ATD. So, I am very sorry but I think this may have been a bit hasty, and am inviting the nominator to kindly withdraw. The person who moved this to Main was right. Thanks. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: I also couldn't find sig/in-depth coverage, aside from some churnalism or press releases based coverage, so this clearly fails GNG. Saqib ( talk) 21:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    I also couldn't find sig/in-depth coverage: thank you for your efforts, but just read the page then, and open the links of the 9 reviews (and there are probably more). :D))) - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Mushy Yank, I recall you advising me previously that I don't need to reply to every comment. However, you also engage in doing so. I've made my point, and I don't feel the need to argue with anyone further. —  Saqib ( talk) 22:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Wasn't me. I don't remember having advised you not to do so (I noted it is a routine of yours, and even said (twice, maybe) I personally didn't mind). But your !vote seems so ....pardon me, bizarre and unexplainable to me, that I thought I would give you a chance to amend it. Never mind. You didn't find any sig/in-depth coverage when NINE reviews, including some in major Indian newspapers, have been presented? Sure. OK. I must assume good faith then... - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Mushy Yank, In short. No, I don't see any coverage here that can help establish GNG. —  Saqib ( talk) 22:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Kerala. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Strong Keep. Not sure why this AfD came up or if a WP:Before was done. So many reliable reviews... I would even advise a Snow Keep. DareshMohan ( talk) 02:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Strong Keep: Reviews in the article are more than enough for GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk) 02:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep: The film released yesterday (June 14) and has multiple reliable reviews which satisfy WP:NFILM. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Clearly enough coverage since its release yesterday. hinnk ( talk) 07:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • As nominator, withdrawn and keep in light of the new sources. microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 12:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per above passes WP:NFILM. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 21:55, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
Keep, those voting delete have given no proper reasoning as to why the sources aren't adequate. Traumnovelle ( talk) 23:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
Valid and policy based arguments were presented, and in assuming good faith, you may consider the state of the article and existing sources that existed at the time of nomination and also notice that the nomination has been withdrawn and one of the delete !votes had been stricken at the time of your !vote, which also does not present policy arguments. microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 00:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
My vote is based on the presence of sources in the article combined with no apparent issues with them. Traumnovelle ( talk) 02:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply
My vote is keep this article stay not deletion by -- Sunuraju ( talk) 14:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Numeer

Numeer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a musician, not properly sourced as passing WP:NMUSIC. The main notability claim on offer here is that his music exists, which is not automatically enough in and of itself -- but the referencing is entirely to primary sources, such as his music metaverifying itself on streaming platforms or iTunes or Genius, and/or unreliable celebrity gossip blogs like Celebuzz, which are not support for notability.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 13:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thoppul Kodi

AfDs for this article:
Thoppul Kodi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing changed from last deletion discussion. Notably the film never released (see List of Tamil films of 2011, which lists every Tamil film). Three database sources, two of which are dead. I tried saving the second one but it was just a search for Thoppul and since Thoppul means navel, the search is questionable (commented out since blacklisted). A Google search in both English and Tamil returns nothing [1] except information about umbilical cords. Speedy delete this article, surpised many people edited this since 2012 and did not nominate. Article creator created article with 10+ bad sources. Not notable per Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Albums since only the music released.

Guess who created the article? Either Thomas Rathnam or his fan. DareshMohan ( talk) 06:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Roll No 21

Roll No 21 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, It lacks significant coverage from multiple reliable, independent sources. It does not have in-depth analysis or substantial coverage in reputable publications. The references cited are primarily primary sources or do not offer the necessary independent verification of the show's notability. M S Hassan ( talk) 14:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Mohit Bharatiya

AfDs for this article:
Mohit Bharatiya (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL & WP:GNG. Doesn't appear to have won any elections and majority of sources appear to be promotional/puffery. jellyfish  ✉ 21:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Vir: The Robot Boy

Vir: The Robot Boy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 13:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Arjun – Prince of Bali

Arjun – Prince of Bali (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 12:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Indian colonisation of Khotan

Indian colonisation of Khotan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another messy pov ridden and non-notable article ( WP:POVFORK) by User:Jonharojjashi, this time relying on legendary stories to Indianize the Kingdom of Khotan, despite the WP:RS in the latter saying something completely else (that they were founded by Sakas). Wouldn't be surprised if Jonharojjashi had misused some of the WP:RS in this article as well, wouldn't be the first time [2]. Heck, Jonharojjashi is even citing William Bayne Fisher here, though has purposefully omitted the part where he states the Kingdom of Khotan was founded by Sakas, [1] which is mentioned in the Kingdom of Khotan article.

Instead of obsessing over uncorroborated legends and create a whole article out of it, Jonharojjashi should perhaps look into the consensus in WP:RS instead of ignoring it (such as they did to the WP:RS in Kingdom of Khotan), such as this pretty relevant excerpt; "In the version of the Travels, it is the ministers of the son of King Aśoka (ca. 272-31 BCE) who fled India and founded Khotan, where the earth rose in the form of a breast. In the Life (Beal, 1888, p. 203) and in the Tibetan Prophecy of the Li (that is, Khotan) Country (Thomas, pt. 1, pp. 100 f.; Emmerick, 1967, pp. 19-21), it is the banished prince himself who, having been fed by the breast from the earth, later founded the kingdom. Although found in two independent sources, which shows that the story was widespread, it is a legend devised to claim a noble origin of the lineage and should not be confused with historical data (against this see Emmerick, 1979, p. 167; Idem, 1983, p. 263). No colonialization of Khotan by India in the 3rd century BCE is to be considered seriously." This is written by Hiroshi Kumamoto [3], an expert in Khotanese history (eg [4]).

I think this excerpt from Jonharojjashi's report [5] sums it up pretty well; "It seems sufficient that this editor (Jonharojjashi) is habitually citing poor sources, misusing better ones in an OR matter, and PoV-forking at will, all to push a viewpoint that is clearly counter-historical and India-promotional." HistoryofIran ( talk) 02:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete: At best, parts of the contents of the article could be added to an "alternative theories" section on the Kingdom of Khotan article. But as it contradicts reliable sources, it does not merit its own article.
  1. ^ Fisher, William Bayne; Yarshater, Ehsan (1968). The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge University Press. p. 614. ISBN  978-0-521-20092-9. One branch of the Sakas who founded a kingdom in Khotan (in the Tarim Basin) were zealous Buddhist....

Amir Ali Khan (subedar)

Amir Ali Khan (subedar) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Outside of a road being named after this person in an Indian town, I can find nothing to indicate this person meets notability guidelines. Even looking up the naming of the road seems to have been done at the request of the foundation created by his immediate family. The page has been consistently edited by members of the family and those admitting to clear COIs. Article is an orphan as well. Lindsey40186 ( talk) 14:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Kali Raat

Kali Raat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails general notability guideline. search only turns up a song of the same name and the phrase "kali raat". ltb d l ( talk) 01:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Murree rebellion of 1857

Murree rebellion of 1857 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well it has needed more sourcing since 2014, much of the content seems to be about other events, and there is no real; evidence of notable coverage.

As well as some of the sources being a bit iffy. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Pakistan, India, and Punjab. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    I agree with you that more sources should be added, maybe also an infobox to sum everything up since it's a pretty long article. However I could find multiple reputable sources with a quick google search such as articles by the University of the Punjab, the Pakistan Perspective, the United Service Institution of India, and a book titled Murree Rebellion of 1857 by Barnabas Crist Bal. I think it's important that we expand on this article instead of deleting a piece of history. Thomas Preuss Harrison ( talk) 18:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Yes the article needs improvement but the event recorded was not an insignificant one in the context of the chaotic developments of 1857. Saul David's 2002 history The Indian Mutiny records the concern expressed by Sir John Lawrence as "disaffection and mutiny spread" during August of that year and that this included the Muslim tribal unrest in the Murree Hills. Buistr ( talk) 07:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Poor, unreliable sources and many fails verification. Some of these unreliable sources are WP:RAJ era and primary sources. The event was not significant and if reliable sources with coverage is to be found, it can very well be merged to Indian Rebellion of 1857. RangersRus ( talk) 13:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Sourabh Chowdhury

Sourabh Chowdhury (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet GNG and reliable sources for inclusion. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 00:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Asia, and India. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 00:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: All I can find are variations of this story [6], which don't contribute to notability, and I'm unsure if it's the same person. The article now is very PROMO. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Are you seriously confused if the person of the article is same or not? Common man, there's no chance to be confused because he is a social influencer and, therefore, you can easily watch his channel and cross-check those achievement on official website of organizers.
    Yeah if you think it's a PROMO, just feel free to give your touch and delete whatever word you think as promotional.
    Thank you Strikingstar01 ( talk) 18:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
So you think the major cause for deletion is insufficient sources and a little bit promo content? OK, if I fix both causes, then will you guys agree on retaining the article? Strikingstar01 ( talk) 03:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: This is clearly PROMO, created by a SPA. The subject hasn't received sig/ in-depth coverage in RS, aside from some churnalism or paid coverage which is not enough to establish GNG . Saqib ( talk) 21:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Assalam o alaikum,
    I don't know but would like to listen why you think it's a promo and I'm a SPA?
    1) the sources clearly varifies that the person got 1st rank in multiple national and global tournament, You can't buy the organizers to mention your name in 1st place yearly events because they can mention names of only one and actual winner.
    2) Common man, How could you expect churnalism from government's site?
    3) Yeah the article could be PROMO because I've just started this journey with tons of guideline and could make several mistakes. Please mention sentences which indicates promotional content. Strikingstar01 ( talk) 07:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. WP:PROMO page. The subject has not made any significant achievement, notable to warrant a page on him. This page reads clear promotion of the subject. RangersRus ( talk) 13:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Don't you think, if a person have more than 40 Million impression and bunch of golabal achievements, he deserve a page? Strikingstar01 ( talk) 13:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

2023 Anantnag encounter

2023 Anantnag encounter (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, counterterrorism/counterinsurgency such as this are not uncommon in the long running Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir (part of the broader Kashmir conflict). I am not seeing from the sources how this is notable as a standalone or any lasting significance of it. Gotitbro ( talk) 23:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep I am not disputing what the nominator says, but our threshold for acceptance is not commonality or lasting significance but widespread coverage in reliable sources. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    With events, lasting significance is very much a factor, which I think this fails. An event can get a lot of reliable coverage at the time, but without lasting significance, it is usually deleted at AfD. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 12:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Routine news coverage of Insurgency in Kashmir region are not sufficient basis to warrant this page. No significance of this newsworthy event to qualify for inclusion. RangersRus ( talk) 13:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep It was notable at that time and it is notable today as well. The article has to be updated and content about NIA charging the individuals involved in this incident on 16 March 2024 should be included. ArvindPalaskar ( talk) 02:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Inspector Chingum

Inspector Chingum (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 15:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and India. Shellwood ( talk) 18:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Added a few things. If judged insufficient, redirect to Motu Patlu#Recurring. Again, I am inviting the nominator to PLEASE slow down nominations of Indian animated series or to directly and boldly redirect them to obvious related articles if they think apparent notability issues need to be addressed urgently. THANK YOU. Taking a page to Afd with a minimal rationale may take some time but checking sources, improving the page, verifying potential targets, etc, also does. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    I prefer not to boldly redirect articles to other articles because I believe in the significance of discussion and reaching consensus. M S Hassan ( talk) 04:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    Fair enough! Thank you for your comment. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I would not redirect to Motu Patlu#Recurring because that page segment too has no sources, no inline citation and possibly contains original research. I would have redirect to the production company if they had a page with this spin-off in the list of production. Reviewing the sources, the indepth coverage is insufficient and fails general notability guideline. RangersRus ( talk) 13:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Myrlin Hermes

Myrlin Hermes (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. I can't think of any other applicable grounds for notability for this subject. JFHJr ( ㊟) 21:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. JFHJr ( ㊟) 21:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, India, England, California, Hawaii, and Oregon. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I've added several refs and details to the article (while removing unsourced content). There is no significant coverage of Hermes. Her first book won a Lambda Literary Award for Bisexual Literature in 2011, but even if that's considered an important enough award for WP:ANYBIO #1, I consider that the absence of any coverage of her outweighs that. I found a few reviews of her first book in major newspapers, so an article on Careful What You Wish For could be justified. (But I'll note that the Washington Post reviewer generously concluded, "Myrlin Hermes is 23 years old, an age at which having published a book at all is a substantial accomplishment. There's plenty of time for her to turn into a real writer." [7]) Schazjmd  (talk) 22:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Chumbak TV

Chumbak TV (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; written like a TV guide. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 20:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Shemaroo TV

Shemaroo TV (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; written like a TV guide. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 20:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to BIG Synergy#Fiction shows. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain

AfDs for this article:
Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NTV. Tagged for notability since 2020 DonaldD23 talk to me 13:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Vipul Shah (businessman)

Vipul Shah (businessman) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessman, with no significant secondary coverage in reliable sources, just passing mentions in The Hindu and Fortune. He's interviewed in The Week as cited, but that's a primary source. Passing mentions, routine coverage in trade blogs and softball interviews was all else I could find in a WP:BEFORE search. Promotional tone and editing history of article creator suggests UPE. Wikishovel ( talk) 07:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. No significant coverage in secondary independent reliable sources. The page has mostly routine news coverage and announcements that are not sufficient basis for a page on this subject. Fails WP:BIO. RangersRus ( talk) 12:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete All of the cited sources are trivial mentions and I can't find any significant coverage. — hako9 ( talk) 15:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Adarsh Liberal

AfDs for this article:
Adarsh Liberal (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Years ago this term was circulated once on social media by right wing trolls, but there is no significant coverage of this non-notable term in any reliable sources. Ratnahastin ( talk) 02:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Prasads Multiplex

Prasads Multiplex (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline G11, no indication of notability or significance for this IMAX theater, Sourcing isn't of WP:ORG level depth Star Mississippi 12:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Organizations, and India. Star Mississippi 12:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Independent coverage in rather reliable sources, significant and in depth, about this multiplex, and backing the claim that it houses the biggest screen in India! (other sources claim it is one of the world's largest 3D IMax). So, yes, there are various indications of significance and notability and it seems to meet WP:GNG. A redirect to Culture_of_Hyderabad#Film is imv absolutely warranted anyway. Opposed to deletion. (G11? "exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to serve as encyclopedia articles, rather than advertisements. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." So basically, borderline G11 is not G11, if it was just that the tone and content may have been partially promotional, Afds are not for cleanup and given existing coverage, this potential issue was easily fixed; added 2 refs and trimmed the page but this can evidently be improved and expanded, thank you) - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Before closing this as no consensus, I'd like to try one more relisting
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I don't think WP:ORG applies to a building, I did remove some of the promotional stuff but it does appear this meets notability due to the sustained coverage of it. Traumnovelle ( talk) 23:55, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Tata AIA Life

Tata AIA Life (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient number of references for the significance of the article Welcome to Pandora ( talk) 11:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Welcome to Pandora a lack of references is not reason for deletion. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Guide to deletion.
I would suggest a Redirect to Tata Group which holds a majority stake in the company, as I couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV in secondary sources. I did, however, found a lot of routine coverage: [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Broc ( talk) 12:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. There are enough in-depth news articles on a recent ad campaign to justify an article (though I suggest that it be merely a section, not a whole article), [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22], and that's before we get to the 400+ hits on the company's name in Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library. Many of those include routine coverage, but not all of them are restricted to only routine coverage. I suggest Fortune, as it's a compare-and-contrast (classic secondary source), Economic Times (detailed evaluation of company's risks and opportunities), and maybe E4M (tying their political activity to their overall branding). WhatamIdoing ( talk) 01:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Siege of Barwara (1757)

Siege of Barwara (1757) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The whole article relies on WP:RAJ and out dated sources ( WP:AGE MATTERS) and there is no mention of “Siege of Barwara (1757)” in the sources. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 09:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

WP:RAJ is not a policy or guideline. It is an essay on the quality of sources on the Indian caste system and those written by Britons or Briton diplomats and administrators or under the guidance and review of Briton administrators like Lepel Griffin, Michael MacAuliffe, Sir John Withers McQueen. Indian historians like Sarkar's sources are used because historians today depend on their secondary work. Sarkar is an eminent historian and is perfectly reliable. Source still needs to be reviewed and verified. RangersRus ( talk) 15:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
Even if WP:RAJ doesn't applies here it is still not a reliable source as per WP:AGE MATTERS and this is the only source used in the article thus it fails WP:GNG too. Mnbnjghiryurr ( talk) 04:02, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Blocked sock. RangersRus ( talk) 16:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply
If old sources have become obsolete due to coverage in new sources then AGE matters and it does not apply here. Multiple sources are expected but there is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage. RangersRus ( talk) 11:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
Just found it at RSN. Hope this helps to evaluate the reliability of Jadunath Sarkar. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 16:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

*Delete, it clearly fails WP:GNG & there is only one sourced used in this article (Fall of the Mughal Empire by Jadunath Sarkar) which is not a reliable source as per WP:AGE MATTERS. Mnbnjghiryurr ( talk) 03:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Blocked sock. RangersRus ( talk) 16:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. I had to wait to be able to find the source on the page for verification. Source by Sarkar has enough coverage from page 191 to 193 on the siege. The name of location is Barwada not Barwara (spelling error?). Page passes general notability guidelines. RangersRus ( talk) 11:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, as per Nom & it fails WP:GNG Chauthcollector ( talk) 12:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk) 00:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep There was indeed a siege of Barwara in 1757, and there are multiple good sources. I see no reason to delete an article about a verified historical event. My impression is that we don't have enough coverage of the global south, not an overabundance that requires aggressive pruning. With that said, the article should probably be renamed, per @ RangersRus, unless there are other sources that say "Barwara". Pecopteris ( talk) 05:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Next Assam Legislative Assembly election

Next Assam Legislative Assembly election (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NCRYSTAL. Nothing about the election has been declared yet, no WP:RS are currently talking about it. Should be recreated closer to the election, once actual sources start discussing it.

For similar recent AfDs, see - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Next_Goa_Legislative_Assembly_election (July 2022), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Goa Legislative Assembly election (2nd nomination) (2 April), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Goa Legislative Assembly election (19 May), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election (19 May) Soni ( talk) 13:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India. Soni ( talk) 13:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Assam-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - This is the second AfD on this topic. I previously nominated this article, and the consensus was to keep it. I continue to support the previous decision. For reference: Previous discussion. Hitro talk 22:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Next elections pass WP:CRYSTAL. I'm not sure what makes this one different. SportingFlyer T· C 23:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply
    I waited for the 2 other AFDs from this month to close, just to be sure this was not a one-off of me misevaluating Crystal. But mainly -
    If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. Examples of appropriate topics include the 2028 U.S. presidential election and 2032 Summer Olympics. By comparison, the 2044 U.S. presidential election and 2048 Summer Olympics are not appropriate article topics if nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research.
    I searched and found no sources talking about the election. I didn't find any consensus about next elections in any notability guidelines I could see. I found 5 (+2) AFDs that suggested deletion is the correct approach, and just 1 that didn't.
    This topic also needs a talk page notification and/or a higher level consensus established somewhere (I don't know where), otherwise each AFD will end at a different inconsistent place. But until I see such higher level consensus, my read of both Crystal and prior consensus says it's pretty clear it should be a delete. Soni ( talk) 23:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply
    I disagree, there is already coverage of this election: [23] [24] along with articles about new delineation. SportingFlyer T· C 23:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
    Yeah that Hindu article (published 5 days ago) is definitely talking directly about the elections.
    I disagree on the livemint article, it's not coverage of the elections as much as just "BJP leader stated something about Hindu-Muslim divide in Congress". It's not significant, and they only mention it as a "in a few years".
    I missed a couple other articles on my before check - [25] [26] so I do agree there is significant enough coverage for the election. Soni ( talk) 04:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Too many of these future prediction pages. WP:TOOSOON. Way down in the future and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, nor is it a collection of unverifiable content. RangersRus ( talk) 12:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note - There are 5 connected AFDs in this - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Kerala Legislative Assembly election, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Manipur Legislative Assembly election, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. This didn't seem to meet MULTIAFD as each of them are at a different level of RS reporting, but the general question (Is it CRYSTAL) would still apply. Soni ( talk) 02:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC) reply
If a date has been set for each of these, then they should each be moved to reflect that. Mangoe ( talk) 18:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I guess I support keeping this article now. See above comment. Coverage is now significant enough. Soni ( talk) 04:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: !vote balance at this time is leaning keep, although I will note that most of the connected AfDs noted above this relist have since been closed as consensus for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep In established democracies, the next election is not a violation of WP:CRYSTAl. Sourcing and existing information is sufficient. -- Enos733 ( talk) 18:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete There's just not enough here for an election that is almost two years off; the only substance is the date itself. Failing that, it should be moved to 2026 Assam Legislative Assembly election since this has a set date. Mangoe ( talk) 18:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further discussion since the previous list has not cleared things up.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. More policy based input would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep The sources provided by SportingFlyer and Soni show that this meets item 1 of CRYSTAL – this election is notable and almost certain to take place. Toadspike [Talk] 04:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete too much original research here and the title is inappropriate. Whilst there may be sources for notability I don't believe the current article is viable it's pretty much complete OR without any sourcing. Traumnovelle ( talk) 06:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. There is consensus to keep the content. No prejudice against merging, if someone want to pursue that avenue and do the work. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

India-Latin America relations

India-Latin America relations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Articles on diplomatic relations are supposed to be country specific as long as they concern modern period. This article's title is too broad, inaccurate and whatever is added here can be already found on other articles. Ratnahastin ( talk) 05:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I don't share that understanding of what counts as a legitimate article at all; there are many articles concerning country-to-region relations, such as Africa–India relations, Sino-Latin America relations, etc. Also, I would like to ask which other articles most of the information in this article can be found at. GreekApple123 ( talk) 05:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC) reply
Africa–India relations is based on historical relations while Sino-Latin America relations shall also require deletion. Ratnahastin ( talk) 06:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom or Merge into other Indian articles about relations with Latin America
48JCL ( talk) 13:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep The article is well sourced and covers India's relations with Latin America. With India's growing economy, this a topic which has been getting covered these past years. Dash9Z ( talk) 07:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep A brief look at the references in the article was enough to convince me that India–Latin America relations are a notable topic covered significantly by reliable sources. Those are reputable, scholarly sources, like The Diplomat and several journal articles, discussing this subject at length. Toadspike [Talk] 23:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge to Foreign relations of India, where it makes more sense for now. Content could always be split if it becomes more comprehensive. Dan the Animator 00:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep per points made by other users advocating for keep. Will be open to work on it more post afd closure
  • Keep Article should be kept and rather expanded. — Hemant Dabral ( 📞 • ✒) 02:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolkur Sadashivapet Indian Railways

Proposed deletions

Files for deletion

Category discussion debates

Template discussion debates

Redirects for deletion

MFD discussion debates

Other deletion discussions

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/India&oldid=1229359109"