![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
This discussion forum has an extensive backlog where the oldest active entry was started on 10 June 2015 ({{Initiated|10 June 2015}}), and at the time if me posting this request, the page has 163 discussions that have yet to be closed, several started over a month ago.
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Since this discussion board is now deprecated, and there will be no new discussions opened there, I would appreciate some help clearing the backlog.-- Aervanath ( talk) 21:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Would an administrator please assess the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Martin Hogbin? Thanks, -- Sammy1339 ( talk) 19:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm looking for an admin to close this move request, because of the sensitive nature of it. It's worth noting that a few new or little-used accounts/IPs have commented on both sides. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Emily Dickinson#Emily Dickinson's main picture (Initiated 3070 days ago on 19 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Done
Robert McClenon (
talk) 08:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds#Request for comments (Initiated 3073 days ago on 16 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Done - No consensus.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 08:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church#RFC: Reliable sources (Initiated 3088 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Would an admin please assess the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Boomerang: Proposed Topic Ban for Krzyhorse22 and close the discussion as they see fit. Thanks, W C M email 12:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
A consensus has been reached. GoodDay ( talk) 22:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for 25 days. The discussion has petered out, and there is a clear consensus that it can be closed now. But this is a highly controversial issue, and has been the subject of numerous previous requests. Looking for an experienced, careful, and brave admin to close the discussion. St Anselm ( talk) 18:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Done by
Mike Cline--
Aervanath (
talk) 12:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
After days of recycling the same arguments over and over, it looks like there is a sort of compromise everyone would agree with, while the talk page has not been edited for a week.-- The Traditionalist ( talk) 03:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campus sexual assault#"The majority of rape and other sexual assault victims do not report their attacks to law enforcement." (Initiated 3074 days ago on 15 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vehbi_Koç#RfC_on_the_Kasapyan_estate (Initiated 3079 days ago on 10 January 2016)? Étienne Dolet ( talk) 07:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#RfC on inclusion of Overtime Politics polls (Initiated 3079 days ago on 10 January 2016)? 108.2.58.56 ( talk) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus of the RfC at Talk:Shrauta (Initiated 3038 days ago on 20 February 2016)? I doubt there will be more input. VictoriaGrayson Talk 20:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Not done - No need to close after running for 7 rather than 30 days.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 07:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:CobraNet#RfC on manufacturer list (Initiated 3109 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Done - No consensus.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 07:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive278#Standard offer unblock request from Md iet (Initiated 3054 days ago on 4 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cannabis dispensaries in the United States#RfC for "Cannabis dispensaries" or "Marijuana dispensaries" (Initiated 3067 days ago on 22 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Veganism/Archive 14#RfC: Should the definition at the start of the lead of Veganism contain the wording, 'and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals'? (Initiated 3072 days ago on 17 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace#Add templates for poorly sourced content? (Initiated 3090 days ago on 30 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Muhammad#What should be included for information regarding Aishas' marriage to Muhammad on the Muhammad article? (Initiated 3116 days ago on 4 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 65#RfC: Anime films and production companies (Initiated 3103 days ago on 17 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm requesting an early close (and corresponding move) of the move request of Trump Entrepreneur Initiative to Trump University. This is shaping up to be a WP:SNOW discussion and the subject is incredibly hot at the moment, with 99.9% of our traffic coming from our Trump University redirect ( compare these). We are in the thick of the Republican primary election season and I'd think we want to confuse as few voters as possible. Thanks in advance. -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 17:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Move request City of St Albans to St Albans City and District not opposed. Now request closure by admin and move. Pelarmian ( talk)
Can an admin please assess the consensus at this discussion and close it accordingly? Thanks in advance for your help. Best, -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 00:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Both Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald J Drumpf and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 2#Donald Drumpf are shaping up to be a WP:SNOW close to redirect to Donald Trump (Last Week Tonight). Can a non-involved admin look over these and make a final judgement? Thanks, Nathan2055 talk - contribs 22:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
We need an uninvolved admin or experienced editor to close this RfC, there are policy-based arguments on both sides, and a suggested close has been challenged. Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 23:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
It has not been 30 days yet but the only voice against restoring has been that of the editor who did the trimming, and in the meanwhile, edits to the article will progressively make it more difficult to restore the deleted content semi-automatically. LjL ( talk) 15:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
One of the longest and most contentious RfCs I have ever seen. We are really going to need one or more uninvolved admins who are willing to wade through this huge pile of material, apply the 20 or so policies and guidelines that have been invoked, determine consensus, and then write a crystal clear closing summary. No matter what the closing admin does, there will be complaints, appeals, attempts to re-interpret the closing comments, refusal to accept the result, and in all likelihood accusations of antisemitism. Be prepared for a shitstorm on this one.
Related:
-- Guy Macon ( talk) 03:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration#RfC: Proposal to fix a long term structural problem in Palestine Israel conflict articles (Initiated 3075 days ago on 14 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Bernie Sanders#Democrat/Independent (Initiated 3068 days ago on 21 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Eminem#Should info about deaths of Proof and Dawn Scott be added and if yes, then what in form? (RfC) (Initiated 3067 days ago on 22 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons/Archive_39#Seeking clarification (Initiated 3090 days ago on 30 December 2015)? See the subsection Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons/Archive_39#Clarification question on the policy, where the opening editor wrote, "Does the WP:BLPSOURCES ban on tabloid journalism mean that no BLP material can be sourced to a Tabloid Journal?" Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mohamed Hadid/Archives/2018#Request for comment (Initiated 3078 days ago on 11 January 2016)? The opening poster wrote: "Should the article include "(now Israel)" next to mentions of Mandatory Palestine, the name of the place at the time the subject was born?" Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks#RFC (Initiated 3071 days ago on 18 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of oldest living people#RfC: How should we word the lede? (Initiated 3072 days ago on 17 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of oldest living people#RfC: "List of Verified Oldest Living People" as title instead of "List of Oldest Living People" (Initiated 3070 days ago on 19 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS? (Initiated 3083 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage (Initiated 3091 days ago on 29 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
We actually drafted and !voted on a 5-point consensus (with notes than need not be part of the close), at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Can we wrap this up?. While this could be allowed to just expired into the archives, it would be convenient to have a formal close, because the thread, and its derailed sub-thread about clarifying MoS's meaning with regard to formal/encyclopedic language, is holding up re-opening a "clean" discussion on the latter point, unpolluted by "winningest"-related bickering. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 08:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
May we have an administrator review & close that Rfc? It's been about 30 days now. GoodDay ( talk) 13:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3043 days ago on 15 February 2016)
Please disposition this discussion which started on 17FEB2016. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 19:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3041 days ago on 17 February 2016)
Would an experienced editor please close this RFC? It has been open since January 25, and the consensus seems clear. 43.226.229.10 ( talk) 01:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3064 days ago on 25 January 2016)
Will an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Reference_desk/Archive_122#Concrete_proposal concerning semi-protection of the Reference Desks? Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:11, 12 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3047 days ago on 11 February 2016)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Star Alliance#RfC: Should flag icons be removed in the tables? (Initiated 3037 days ago on 21 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
A two part expired RfC, should be a fairly easy close. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3080 days ago on 9 January 2016)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:ExxonMobil#RfC: Should the article have a heading about support for climate change denialism? (Initiated 3078 days ago on 11 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
The RfC recently expired and needs closing. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 04:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3055 days ago on 3 February 2016)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Paul Frampton#RfC on drug smuggling conviction material (Initiated 3061 days ago on 28 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Climate change denial#RfC: Is this article encyclopedic and does it comply with NPOV? (Initiated 3062 days ago on 27 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Edmonson County High School#Should the dress-code controversy information that keeps getting deleted be included in the article? (Initiated 3063 days ago on 26 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
A formal close would be nice. Consensus was clear in the first week or two, and there has been no comment in the last week. Dicklyon ( talk) 01:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Will an administrator please assess the consensus at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive279#BLP_violations_and_sockpuppetry_by_User:Lane99, and, if appropriate, implement the ban? This thread was archived without formal closure. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Request lifting of Topic Ban of DrChrissy (Initiated 3023 days ago on 6 March 2016)? Please consider Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive885#Topic ban for DrChrissy and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive885#DrChrissy's topic ban in your close. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Carly Fiorina#Planned Parenthood and Carly Fiorina (Initiated 3060 days ago on 29 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at
Talk:Maya civilization#Definition sentence (Initiated 3062 days ago on 27 January 2016)? See the subsection
Talk:Maya civilization#RfC: Definition. Thanks,
Cunard (
talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Done ____
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at
Talk:Zionism#RfC (Initiated 3047 days ago on 11 February 2016)? Thanks,
Cunard (
talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Done - No consensus - Recommend new RFC
(Initiated 3047 days ago on 11 February 2016)
We need an experienced editor/admin to look at this RfC. The initial question concerns the way in which Palestine is listed on this page, though the question also has implications for other leaders of unrecognised or partially recognized states, and for leaders of sub-national entities (constituent countries of the Netherlands and so forth). It also impacts on related pages ( List of state leaders in 2015, etc...). I should note that a couple of editors have questioned the phrasing of the RfC itself. Appreciate that this is a complex one but a careful eye is needed to suggest how to proceed! -- Super Nintendo Chalmers ( talk) 21:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an administrator please review & close this Rfc? It's been 30 days, now. GoodDay ( talk) 04:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3047 days ago on 11 February 2016)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:List of the oldest living state leaders#Line for Elizabeth II (Initiated 3069 days ago on 20 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox medical condition#Request for comments: Should the infobox medical condition contain a list of synonyms? (Initiated 0 days ago on 15 June 2024)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Can someone assess the RFC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#RFC for multiple letter capitalisations in the MoS. There are multiple options and there seems to be mixed opinion on all of them. There is also discussion about the same issue at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 20#Extending the "one-letter lowercase prefix" rule to multiple-letter prefixes and Talk:TVOS. Thanks, Tom29739 [ talk 17:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC). (Initiated 3058 days ago on 31 January 2016)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:China#Flag (Initiated 3063 days ago on 26 January 2016)? The opening poster wrote: "Should we adopt or restore or (replace file) this flag with 7 February 2011 version of the flag". Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Comedy of the commons#RfC Should this article be about the phrase or concept of 'Comedy of the Commons' (Initiated 3052 days ago on 6 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#RFC for multiple letter capitalisations in the MoS (Initiated 3058 days ago on 31 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Communist Manifesto#Request for comments (Initiated 3064 days ago on 25 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Freedom Caucus#RFC: far-right (Initiated 3063 days ago on 26 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Fleshlight#Request for comment: image of fleshlight in use (Initiated 3065 days ago on 24 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:The Daily Stormer#Far-right or Neo-Nazism (Initiated 3064 days ago on 25 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Administrative Actions of Nyttend (Initiated 3037 days ago on 21 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
One is snow close Talk:Muhammad#Remove 'founder of islam' reference. The other needs a cool headed admin(preferably knowledgeable in Islam) who is willing to read the entire RFC and is able to deal with the fall out later on. Talk:Muhammad#RFC for opening sentence in the lede. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 07:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Muhammad#RFC for opening sentence in the lede (Initiated 3075 days ago on 14 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes and WP:WEIGHT (Initiated 3056 days ago on 2 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Prices#RfC: why no prices at all? (Initiated 3059 days ago on 30 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Dollar Shave Club#Arbitration clause RFC (Initiated 3056 days ago on 2 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Germany#RFC: Should there be a See Also to Puerto Rican Day Parade attacks? (Initiated 3055 days ago on 3 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Malcolm X#RfC: Which photo is best for the infobox? (Initiated 3046 days ago on 12 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Child abuse#RfC: Should the lead sentence use a broader definition of child abuse? (Initiated 3055 days ago on 3 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mary Katharine Ham#RfC: Which photo is best for the infobox? (Initiated 3051 days ago on 7 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Republican Party presidential candidates, 2016#RfC: Should the candidate tables contain state maps and logos? (Initiated 3055 days ago on 3 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Rafik Yousef#Request for comment regarding categorisation (Initiated 3046 days ago on 12 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#RfC: amendment to WP:NOTREPOSITORY (Initiated 3051 days ago on 7 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cold War II#RfC: Add info about China–U.S. relations? (Initiated 3044 days ago on 14 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus? (Initiated 3014 days ago on 15 March 2016) Horizonlove ( talk) 00:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
A merge proposal at the above page has received eight opinions but has had no activity for more than a month. So I am requesting that it be closed. AtHomeIn神戸 ( talk) 02:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3046 days ago on 12 February 2016)
This TfD on a frequently-used Article Wizard template has been running for five days. All but one editor has !voted "keep" and the nominator has clarified that they don't actually want to delete or merge the template. -- McGeddon ( talk) 20:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
I was about to close Talk:Tor_(anonymity_network)#Requested_move_25_February_2016 as not moved, but I saw this subsection. I don't think I can close it because of this, if someone can close it, I'd be thankful. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 20:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Open nearly a month. Not many new arguments being made. Calidum ¤ 03:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling/Conventions#RfC on Motorcycling Conventions (Initiated 3057 days ago on 1 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Unclosed discussions from 2015 December 4, 2015 December 7 and Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 December 29. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 15:44, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:Infobox character#Template-protected edit request on 25 February 2016 (Initiated 3033 days ago on 25 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I would like to request that an uninvolved administrator review and close the discussion at Talk:Block_chain_(database)#Are_block_chain_designs_based_on_the_bitcoin_protocol.3F. The discussion has been open for multiple weeks, and has had the involvement of a number of editors. Thanks. N2e ( talk) 02:40, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
(Initiated 3020 days ago on 9 March 2016) Could a trusted editor or admin please close Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools#RfC: Address. Consensus seems clear, but need someone uninvolved.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2016 in American television#RfC: Should "person of color" be changed to "black woman"? (Initiated 3035 days ago on 23 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Standard offer#Proposal for this to finally become a guideline (Initiated 3027 days ago on 2 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard#WP:ANRFC transclusion (Initiated 3036 days ago on 22 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Plushophilia#RfC: Should the image be kept on the page? (Initiated 3026 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Listed for a month individually, and started as part of a batch on 14 February. -- BDD ( talk) 18:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at MediaWiki talk:Move-redirect-text#Redr (Initiated 3108 days ago on 12 December 2015)? — Godsy( TALK CONT) 19:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Done
Oiyarbepsy (
talk) 00:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
It was redated once and it's been ongoing for 54 days now, but discussion has pretty much died down. All of the monitors of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Language and linguistics voted for a third option, "often": 1, 2, 3 and 4. Current article lead hasn't existed for very long so nothing is yet "stable". -- Mr. Magoo and McBarker ( talk) 23:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Special:Preferences#RfC: Change Default Math Appearance Setting to MathML (Initiated 3107 days ago on 13 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#Fixing images below the default size (Initiated 3063 days ago on 26 January 2016)? See the subsection Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#RfC: Should the guideline maintain the "As a general rule" wording or something similar?. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Gun laws in Illinois#RfC: Magazine capacity and state preemption (Initiated 3058 days ago on 31 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Could an admin take the appropriate closure action here and change the page notice on the article? A decision to force AmEng on the article last year was done so on a false statement on the original variant of English used, and the current consensus reflects the truth of the matter. – SchroCat ( talk) 09:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Avoiding_dangerous_climate_change#Originally_about_2005_conference (Initiated 3031 days ago on 27 February 2016)? -- Mr. Magoo ( talk) 20:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
(Initiated 2993 days ago on 5 April 2016)Could a trusted editor or admin please close Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Close down Possibly Unfree Files. Consensus seems clear, but need someone uninvolved. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 23:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Could an administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legal threat? This was a very contentious ANI thread, and a request for arbitration is concurrently open for the same issues. Mz7 ( talk) 21:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Could we get a WP:SNOW close on this WP:BLP-sensitive AfD, please? Thanks, ansh 666 22:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Could an uninvolved editor please assess consensus at this TfD? It's the oldest open discussion at TfD. (Initiated 3034 days ago on 24 February 2016) Thanks!~ Rob Talk 01:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:NARAL Pro-Choice America#Change "pro-choice" to "pro-abortion" per WP:NPOV (Initiated 3029 days ago on 29 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 125#RfC on Wikipedia:Authority Control (Initiated 3064 days ago on 25 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Uninvolved editor needed to perform the close. Consensus is fairly clear, but I'm involved. (Initiated 3026 days ago on 3 March 2016) Thanks! ~ Rob Talk 03:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Should resting place include cremation (Initiated 3048 days ago on 10 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Consensus is fairly obvious to close down PUF and merge it with WP:FFD. The closure should be uncontentious, but the enacting of the results will require some work. Posting this here so if anyone wants to go through the grunt work of closing down and marking "historical" the PUF process and then redirecting users in the relevant documentation to WP:FFD, they can get started on that. Also, someone will have to move the backlog of cases from PUF (or clear them) as well. Thanks for any help! -- Jayron 32 18:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Expired RfC does not appear to let the actual article remain on a consensus version without official closure. I think it is possible to determine consensus and close it, so I am requesting it here. LjL ( talk) 14:40, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at Talk:List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#Use_of_national_flag_icons_on_each_launch_payload Cheers. (Initiated 0 days ago on 15 June 2024) N2e ( talk) 19:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David L. Jones#RFC: Inclusion of draft sections (Initiated 3109 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Russell Wilson/Archives/2018/November#Should the language addressing Wilson's ethnicity be changed? (Initiated 3053 days ago on 5 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hadith of Jesus Praying Behind Mahdi#RFC for sourcing (Initiated 3064 days ago on 25 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories#RFC: Update of Background section per BBC 2011 (Initiated 3056 days ago on 2 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Proscenium#RfC: the relevance of the Teatro Olimpico to this article (Initiated 3049 days ago on 9 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
This RfC expired a week ago, but was never closed. A formal closure is needed, as involved editors are starting to make a bit of a mess. RGloucester — ☎ 17:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:SNOW, but the primary editors of the article refuse to acknowledge consensus. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 23:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting#Generic gun photo (Initiated 3025 days ago on 4 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:History of IBM CKD Controllers#RfC: Should IBM 2841 be a separate article and should it list the IBM 7320 (Initiated 3035 days ago on 23 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Israel#Should the same language be used in the lead for Israel and for Palestine? (Initiated 3045 days ago on 13 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Marco Rubio#RfC: Should Senator Rubio's portrait be replaced? (Initiated 3029 days ago on 29 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Shrauta#RfC: move page to Śrauta (Initiated 3038 days ago on 20 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Shannara Chronicles#RFC for Episode List Format (Initiated 3045 days ago on 13 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Relist has gone well over 7 days. LibStar ( talk) 07:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Planet Nine#RfC: Images used for Planet Nine (Initiated 3054 days ago on 4 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
We need an experienced editor to assess the discussion in the above link. The difference of opinion lies in whether an article about a train station, or railway station, should begin with simply the name of the station (for example, "Culver City") or whether it should begin with the title of the article, like "Culver City station." Discussion has tapered off; recent remarks have simply repeated the arguments made earlier. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 17:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3036 days ago on 22 February 2016)
Consensus needs to be evaluated. -- George Ho ( talk) 23:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
The subject GAR is open for community reassessment since October 2015. Need someone to conclude it. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 10:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
This Rfc has reached its 30th day. We need an administrator to close it & make his/her own interpretation of the results. GoodDay ( talk) 04:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mitsubishi Magna#RfC: Is referenced comparative material false/unfit for article? (Initiated 3063 days ago on 26 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Maya civilization#RfC: Maya Calendar: How many piktuns in a kalabtun? (Initiated 3050 days ago on 8 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Serbia international footballers (including predecessor teams)#RfC on "including predecessor teams" (Initiated 3065 days ago on 24 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
IMHO, this Rfc's options have been unintentionally worded in a non-neutral style & therefore, the Rfc should be closed. Note I've opened up a new Rfc, which presents the same options, but rather in a neutral style. GoodDay ( talk) 14:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3043 days ago on 15 February 2016)
Update: The first Rfc has expired as no consensus for any of the 3 options. Furthermore, I've closed the second Rfc (that I had opened), per StAnselm's point, about "unnecessary verbiage".:) GoodDay ( talk) 01:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
I'm requesting an admin or an experienced user to assess the consensus at the mentioned page. (Initiated 3039 days ago on 19 February 2016) Mhhossein ( talk) 05:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Penny#WP:ENGVAR (Initiated 3050 days ago on 8 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of current state leaders by date of assumption of office#Rfc: How shall Elizabeth II be presented? (Initiated 3048 days ago on 10 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sicario (2015 film)#Request for comment (Initiated 3026 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alt-right#RfC: Merge to Richard B. Spencer (Initiated 3023 days ago on 6 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campus sexual assault#RfC: Criticism subsection (Initiated 3037 days ago on 21 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Pepperdine University#RfC: Should the current "In popular culture" section be significantly modified or deleted? (Initiated 3045 days ago on 13 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Séralini affair#RfC Regarding content scope and neutrality (Initiated 3106 days ago on 14 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
The discussion seems contentious which is why I'm not closing it myself. Cunard ( talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)1. Should we include the mention that Seralini's papers have been published in the peer-reviewed literature?
2. Should we include the studies which are discussed - or within the actual scope, of this article?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vladimir Putin#Rfc regarding sentence in the lede (Initiated 3039 days ago on 19 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Gibraltar sovereignty referendum, 2002#Spanish response (Initiated 3041 days ago on 17 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Corporal punishment/Archive 3#RfC: Merge "Campaigns against corporal punishment" into "Corporal punishment"? (Initiated 3027 days ago on 2 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin please close Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 18#File:The Testament of Sister New Devil Vol.1 Blu-Ray.jpg, or perhaps relist it if you think that is appropriate. It just seems to have been left open, and there hasn't been any new comments in over a month. Calathan ( talk) 18:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
We need an uninvolved editor to close the RFC on this page, please. — Torchiest talk edits 16:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal: Enable Hovercards by default (Initiated 3013 days ago on 16 March 2016)? The discussion is listed at Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Request for early closure, since participants have mutually agreed on a consensus. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 21:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
It is clear that closure by an uninvolved editor is helpful even if there's an agreed on consensus ("since we might like to be able to point to a single, proper, clearly labeled discussion in case there are challenges"). I am therefore removing the notdone template so that the discussion will be closed by an uninvolved editor. Cunard ( talk) 05:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Here is what the admin said: "If you've agreed on a consensus, there's no need for formal closure. ~ RobTalk 13:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC). Now, according to WP:RfC, "The RfC participants can agree to end it at any time," whether a resolution was reached or not, and that "it can be formally closed by any uninvolved editor", whether admin or not (though since closings can be challenged, I've often found in practical terms it's better for an admin to do it).
It goes on to say that we can choose to enclose the RfC discussion in a box "with or without a closing statement." Since our consensus affects a Project-wide template; since it might also affect Project:Television; and since we might like to be able to point to a single, proper, clearly labeled discussion in case there are challenges, I believe we should take the option of enclosing the discussion, using the following template that the WP:RfC makes available: [template]
I would suggest that if there are no objections in the next, say, two days, that I and another of us ask an uninvolved editor to enclose this RfC discussion. I hope this sounds OK.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Georgiy Starostin#RfC: Should Starostin's hobby as a self-published music blogger be mentioned in this article? (Initiated 3024 days ago on 5 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Deepak Chopra#RfC: Is the lead, among other parts of the article, reflective of the sources and a NPOV? (Initiated 3023 days ago on 6 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Proposal to do away with including world leader responses to terrorist incidents (Initiated 3006 days ago on 23 March 2016)? Please assess the consensus on or after April 22, 2016 (30 days after the RfC was begun). Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Peyton Manning#Request For Comment (Initiated 3022 days ago on 7 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Exponential function#RfC: Should exponential function be about exponentiation to any base? (Initiated 3012 days ago on 17 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Tom Pryce#A Welsh racing driver is a five year old discussion that was never properly closed. The discussion's initiator claimed agreement in their favour after roughly two weeks, but I see many argument against their position which are apparently ignored. I have some concerns of it constituting a WP:local consensus, since there is a pre-existing consensus WikiProject consensus on how to deal with the raised type of issue. I would be greatly appreciated if an uninvolved person makes a proper assessment of the discussion. (Initiated 4909 days ago on 6 January 2011) T v x1 13:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
The Graffiki DRV hasn't been closed, a week after the normal discussion period was over. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Real Robot#RFC: What should this be titled? (Initiated 3017 days ago on 12 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 2#File:Good Morning Britain 1986 sofa.jpg (Initiated 3170 days ago on 11 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
An uninvolved admin needed to close. (Initiated 3027 days ago on 2 March 2016) Vanjagenije (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David Irving/Archive 10#RfC: Is the last suggested version regarding David Irving's position on the Holocaust acceptable to be added ("Höfle Telegram material") (Initiated 3042 days ago on 16 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Does "died by suicide" constitute a euphemism? (Initiated 3037 days ago on 21 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Ethnicity in infoboxes (Initiated 3027 days ago on 2 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach#RfC: Emphasize benchmark dates in Bach Legacy time line instead of using arbitrary century markers like 1800, 1900, 2000 etc. (Initiated 3032 days ago on 26 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:1st century#RfC: Should the lead say "First Century" or "1st century"? (Initiated 3026 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:PBB#RfC: Should template:PBB cease operating by transulating subpage onto each article (Initiated 3026 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Stack Overflow#Criticism (Initiated 3032 days ago on 26 February 2016)? The opening poster wrote: "Should this be included? Can Medium be considered a reliable source in this context, regardless of what WP:RS says about blogs?" Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
We need an uninvolved admin to close the RfC on whether or not the popular vote should be included in the template. That discussion is located here. Please note that this topic has also been discussed outside of the RfC. Thanks. Prcc27🍀 ( talk) 21:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity#Request for comment (Initiated 3016 days ago on 13 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible#For articles on short passages like Psalms, which translation do we quote? (Initiated 3026 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jennifer Lawrence#RfC: Which version of the lead is better? (Initiated 3008 days ago on 21 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jeremy Corbyn#RfC: Place of birth in Infobox (initiated on 17 February 2016)? The original RfC (initiated on 13 January 2016) was closed improperly and overturned here. The subsequent RfC was bot-removed as expired on 18 March 2016. Thanks. Daicaregos ( talk) 07:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Concur with Daicaregos. We need closure. GoodDay ( talk) 12:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vyborg#Historical affiliations infobox (Initiated 3026 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Maxinquaye#Recent revision to the lead (Initiated 3037 days ago on 21 February 2016)? See the subsection Talk:Maxinquaye#RfC on lead. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Australian head of state dispute#Merger proposal (Initiated 3026 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Federal Way Public Academy#RfC: Should Federal Way Public Academy be merged to Federal Way Public Schools? (Initiated 3030 days ago on 28 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954)#Move or merge proposal (Initiated 3017 days ago on 12 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1865–95)#Merge discussion in progress (Initiated 3017 days ago on 12 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Spoiler#RfC: Proposal to make unnecessary spoiling clearer in the guideline (Initiated 3020 days ago on 9 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 127#Use of the phrase "piracy" to mean "copyright infringement" (Initiated 2998 days ago on 31 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016#Request for comments (Initiated 3009 days ago on 20 March 2016)? The opening poster wrote: "In an effort to end the Wikidrama about this issue: should the sentence "Clinton's speeches to Goldman Sachs, for $675,000, have become "a campaign issue"" be added back, or is there a better way to add this referenced info?" Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of living Medal of Honor recipients#RFC: Is it within Wiki policy/guidelines to include recently deceased persons in an article which lists living people? (Initiated 2997 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état#RfC: Should Morsi's removal be called an impeachment or removal instead? (Initiated 3009 days ago on 20 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bernie Sanders#Request for comment: listing positions on particular issues in lead (Initiated 2991 days ago on 7 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive917#User:Jonadabsmith engaging in harassment? (Initiated 3025 days ago on 4 March 2016)? See the subsection Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal: Topic Ban. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Respectfully request an uninvolved administrator please assess the proposal of uninvolved editors at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive920#Proposed Interaction Ban between Springee and HughD. Thank you. Hugh ( talk) 15:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Discuss seems to have reached a lull. Only comments in last few days are comments to make sure it doesn't get archived without admin action. only ( talk) 21:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Standard offer for Technophant (Initiated 2984 days ago on 14 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#Pepper Spray Incident (Initiated 2999 days ago on 30 March 2016)? See the subsection Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#RFC. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vedas#RfC: Replace last paragraph of lead (Initiated 2997 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Really need an administrator to close this one, because this was the third RfC on the same subject in 80 days, and a lot of unorthodox behavior is involved. Softlavender ( talk) 04:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
There's an RfC that I believe can be closed due to consensus (see my post in it at bottom for my summary of the RfC)...posting here as the RfC is reasonably contentious and it requires moving the name of the article...also, think a note should be placed in the TALK BOX of the article, as I explain in my summary post...if someone could take a look, see what they think...thanks.. (Initiated 2965 days ago on 3 May 2016) 68.48.241.158 ( talk) 15:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Could someone close this please. The opposes and supports are equal and is in a highly disputed area but you might be able to suggest a way forward that avoids too much edit warring. Thanks Dmcq ( talk) 22:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:User pages#Should old user space drafts have an expiration date? (Initiated 3005 days ago on 24 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity#RfC on the status of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) (Initiated 2979 days ago on 19 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:State of Palestine#Description of State of Palestine in the lead (Initiated 2987 days ago on 11 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:1971 Bangladesh genocide#RfC: Addition of content about Biharis and different figures regarding people killed and women raped (Initiated 2980 days ago on 18 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Schulze method#RfC: Incomplete Comparison Of Runoff Systems To Schulze In Compliance Table (Requesting Removal) (Initiated 2988 days ago on 10 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Sex offender registries in the United States#Image of the "Classification of offenders" section (Initiated 3013 days ago on 16 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
This needs a good, accurate closing rationale. George Ho ( talk) 18:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy#Is the use of the ESI Score Unencyclopedic? (Initiated 2995 days ago on 3 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Closed
Pincrete (
talk) 19:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13 Drafts (Initiated 0 days ago on 15 June 2024)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:National Rifle Association#Civil Rights/Liberties Org Categorization (Initiated 3006 days ago on 23 March 2016)? The opening poster wrote: "Should the NRA article be placed into the Civil rights/liberties categories". Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:ExxonMobil climate change controversy#RfC: Context of Natuna gas field on the impact of climate expertise on ExxonMobil operational planning (Initiated 2973 days ago on 25 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive280#Topic ban requested (Initiated 2963 days ago on 5 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Significant discussion also occurred prior to the RfC at Talk:Natalie Portman#Major roles, initiated April 7, 2016. RfC initiated April 8, 2016. A number of editors have commented in both sections, but recently discussion has only involved two editors disagreeing about whether there is a consensus. Both of these editors would like a closure. Sundayclose ( talk) 13:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
This RfC has been open since 14 February has seen no activity for about 10 days. Since this deals with a contentious issue that is certain to come up again, it would be helpful if this was closed by a previously uninvolved admin (or possibly more than one). before closing this RfC, it would be useful to read through the discussion below and to have a thorough understanding of how embedding files works on Wikipedia. Right Hand Drive ( talk) 19:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Videos/Archive 1#RfC: Full-length films/videos in articles (Initiated 3018 days ago on 11 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive281#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by sfarney (Initiated 2936 days ago on 1 June 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive925#Francis Schonken's disruptive conduct is preventing content creation on Orgelbüchlein (Initiated 2950 days ago on 18 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Please disposition the speedy deletion request at Undeniable (Hellyeah album). -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 13:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
We currently have two move review discussions waiting closer since March 2016.-- Cúchullain t/ c 14:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
What if all the admins who are willing to close RMs have already commented? A couple in the backlog are 5 weeks old tomorrow. Dicklyon ( talk) 01:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
There are a number of recent discussions at Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 (including maybe these two discussions as well?) that need to be closed, and, given the nature of some of the discussions and the fact that the page in question is under discretionary sanctions, I think it would be best if an administrator (that has ideally not participated in any recent discussions on that talk page) close those discussions. Thanks in advance for any help that you can provide. Guy1890 ( talk) 03:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure this is an appropriate request. I'm the editor they're referring to. This is the contentious information they felt was too unreliable for Wikipedia (it needs work and expansion, obviously): Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016, fraud and irregularity allegations. The issue now concerns how if at all to link from the primaries article to that. If they feel that arbitral remediation is necessary to close a thread that will be reopened to that limited purpose, I support that. If they want to leave the same thread open and continue it solely in that purpose [of whether and how to link] I'm fine with that too. We had all agreed consensus was against inclusion before they asked for arbitration (so I find this confusing), but the question has also now changed with the creation of a separate article. Michael Sheflin ( talk) 17:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Collapse top#RfC: Heading centered or left-aligned by default? (Initiated 2979 days ago on 19 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC) {{ done}} Tazerdadog ( talk) 02:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ted Cruz#RfC: Criticisms and accolades (Initiated 2967 days ago on 1 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC) {{ done}} Tazerdadog ( talk) 02:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:History of South America#RfC: The immediate future of this article (Initiated 2997 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard)#RfC: Does the title, hatnote, and lead of this article adhere to the neutral point of view policy? (Initiated 2965 days ago on 3 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War#RfC: Section title (Initiated 2992 days ago on 6 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Sock puppetry#RfC: Should WP:FAMILY be deleted from WP:SOCK? (Initiated 2995 days ago on 3 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would someone please close Template talk:Rfd2#RfC: Proposal to simplify the substituted output of Rfd2? Thanks! (Initiated 2957 days ago on 11 May 2016) Steel1943 ( talk) 13:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015#Request for Comment: Which Infobox? (Choice of Two) (Initiated 2966 days ago on 2 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Four Noble Truths#RfC on use of the word "redeath" in the article and lede for Four Noble Truths (Initiated 2965 days ago on 3 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
This is an RfC about Wikidata fields in infoboxes. The 30-day period will run at 20:59 (UTC). I'll start work on closing this one at that time. Co-closers are welcome. - Dank ( push to talk) 13:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
This discussion needs an experienced closer. (Initiated 2986 days ago on 12 April 2016) ~ Rob Talk 05:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Hilton Worldwide#Request for comment: Blackstone Group in the infobox (Initiated 2963 days ago on 5 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Top Model (Scandinavia)#Which table should be used in the article? (Initiated 2967 days ago on 1 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#RfC: Merge A9 into A7? (Initiated 2936 days ago on 1 June 2016)? WP:SNOW may be applicable. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2016 Stanley Cup Finals#RFC: Stanley Cup Finals vs. Final (Initiated 2967 days ago on 1 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Relist has gone over 7 days. LibStar ( talk) 09:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Princess Beatrice of York#Section on weight struggles (Initiated 2971 days ago on 27 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts#RfC: Result of the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War (Initiated 2990 days ago on 8 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:World Wide Web#Robert Cailliau ? (Initiated 2950 days ago on 18 May 2016)? The question posed was:
Should Robert Cailliau be listed in the lead as equal co-inventor of the web, alongside Tim Berners-Lee? There is edit-warring going on at present to push this into the article. [2] [3] (and others).
Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
It's been a month, and the RfC has expired. Need an admin to close the RfC and potentially open a phab ticket. (Initiated 2942 days ago on 26 May 2016) — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 18:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin/experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups#RfC: Should sections on genetics be removed from pages on ethnic groups? (Initiated 2970 days ago on 28 April 2016)? Thank you. -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 00:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups#RfC: Should sections on genetics be removed from pages on ethnic groups? (Initiated 2970 days ago on 28 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
This needs an accurate analysis before a closing rationale. George Ho ( talk) 07:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 3048 days ago on 10 February 2016)
Because the discussion has been archived, there are two methods to implement the close: (i) Move the discussion back to the talk page and close it and (ii) Close the discussion, keeping it in the talk page archive, and announce the result on the talk page. Cunard ( talk) 06:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I hope a fresher discussion should be more constructive than this one. It was less managed and disorganized.
George Ho (
talk) 08:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:MDMA/Archive 7#RfC: How big should the "note" be after the first sentence? (Initiated 2996 days ago on 2 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an editor please assess the consensus at this RfC at Talk:1_metre (Initiated 3012 days ago on 17 March 2016)? It is not extremely contentious but there is no large support for a single action. Tigraan Click here to contact me 08:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David Jolly#RFC: Appropriate language for Wikipedia reference (Initiated 2988 days ago on 10 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:John Carter (film)#RfC: Which figure should go in the budget field in the infobox? (Initiated 2985 days ago on 13 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 01:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of youngest birth mothers#RfC Teenage category (Initiated 2972 days ago on 26 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
This discussion needs an experienced closer quickly; it involves the application of a new protection level to address an ongoing issue of disruption. ~ Rob Talk 03:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
{{ Done}} Tazerdadog ( talk) 23:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Potato chip#RfC: Should the history of potato chips use a WP:RS tabloid broadsheet newspaper article as reliable source (Initiated 2963 days ago on 5 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Potato chip#RFC: Should the caption include "crisps" as well as "chips"? (Initiated 2955 days ago on 13 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Archive.is RFC 4 (Initiated 2951 days ago on 17 May 2016)? The discussion is listed at Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cary Grant#RfC on Gay allegations (Initiated 2935 days ago on 2 June 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
This RfC is more than thirty days old, and Legobot has deleted the RfC template, but the discussion has not been formally closed. Comments have generally tended in a certain direction, but many have been somewhat equivocal ("It depends"), so a formal judgment seems desirable. (Initiated 2938 days ago on 30 May 2016) J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 14:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Stanley Milgram#Request for Comment: Should the parameter "Religion: Jewish" be included in this article? (Initiated 2966 days ago on 2 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Joseph Conrad#Rfc: Joseph Conrad's Nationality (Initiated 2965 days ago on 3 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an uninvolved editor please take at look at a merge discussion at Talk:Group of Eight/Archive 2#Merge request 6 June 2016 (Initiated 2943 days ago on 25 May 2016) and judge if consensus has been achieved. If consensus is Yes then please close the discussion and I will merge. If consensus is No then I won't! Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Stop to following me or ban that person from my editing (Initiated 2920 days ago on 17 June 2016)? See the closure request at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Archived without admin ruling:
This discussion was archived without ever being actioned by admins- the consensus seems to have been for a topic ban, but we need an admin to rule on it, or unarchive it. Joseph2302 ( talk) 16:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- I agree this should be closed. I would unarchive it and close it myself but I was involved in the discussion. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 01:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks#RfC: Should the Orlando shooting be included in this list? (Initiated 2914 days ago on 23 June 2016)? While it has been less than the required 30 days, see the discussion here which supports someone closing it. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 21:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
An uninvolved but competent editor is needed. George Ho ( talk) 08:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Please formally close this Rfc I opened, because it is about a contentious area. (Initiated 2944 days ago on 24 May 2016) Debresser ( talk) 14:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Some requests have been made at this RfC to have an experienced editor read over, and close the discussion. Thanks in advance. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 07:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 2957 days ago on 11 May 2016)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Internet fraud/Archives/2016#RfC: Do articles like this contribute to fraud? (poll) (Initiated 2965 days ago on 3 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal#RfC: Should the source comparing Mein Kampf to Art of the Deal be included? (Initiated 2967 days ago on 1 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Anarchism sidebar#RfC: Anarcho-capitalism and its place in this template (Initiated 2969 days ago on 29 April 2016)? There is a clear consensus to include anarcho-capitalism in the template, but the consensus is not as clear on where it should be placed in the template. Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Emma Watson#Emma Watson and the Panama Papers (Initiated 2957 days ago on 11 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Confirm on save when adding links to disambiguation pages (Initiated 2957 days ago on 11 May 2016)? The discussion is listed at Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
This needs a conclusion. George Ho ( talk) 12:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lone wolf (terrorism)#RFC for inclusion (Initiated 2938 days ago on 30 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
(Initiated 2912 days ago on 25 June 2016). Last !vote was five days ago. Thanks. - Mr X 17:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Requesting a formal closure to this discussion so the consensus can be enforced. czar 14:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Armenian Genocide#RfC for Medz Yeghern as an alternative name (Initiated 2972 days ago on 26 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Someone familiar with comic books might be best for this, but that might not be necessary: After five contentious weeks, an overwhelming majority of experienced, veteran WikiProject Comics editors all agree on one side, and only one person, who has rejected two offers of compromise, remains arguing the other side. It's getting a little rancorous, with the same arguments being repeated, so hopefully someone can close it. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 05:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
(Initiated 2957 days ago on 11 May 2016)?
{{ Done}}. Dionysodorus ( talk) 12:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Matrix#RfC: How should the directors of this film be presented in the lead? (Initiated 2958 days ago on 10 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Gary Cooper#RfC: Adding mention of Anderson Lawler (Initiated 2952 days ago on 16 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
I thought about requesting closure of three in one section, but I am not confident about one person reviewing all three. The topic of the discussion is a little more complex. -- George Ho ( talk) 09:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
{{ Done}} by User:Maunus - marking for the bot. Dionysodorus ( talk) 12:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
I thought about requesting closure of three in one section, but I am not confident about one person reviewing all three. The topic of the discussion is kinda simplistic, yet integrity is involved. -- George Ho ( talk) 09:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
{{ Done}} by User:Maunus - marking for the bot. Dionysodorus ( talk) 12:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
I thought about requesting closure of three in one section, but I am not confident about one person reviewing all three. The topic of the discussion is some sort of classification in prose. -- George Ho ( talk) 09:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
{{ Done}} by User:Maunus - marking for the bot. Dionysodorus ( talk) 12:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Chris Kyle#Chris Kyle medals RfC (Initiated 2934 days ago on 3 June 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Lists#RfC on numbers of aircraft built in lists (Initiated 2935 days ago on 2 June 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Multi-sport event#RfC: Can an acceptable definition be written for Category:Sports festivals? (Initiated 2964 days ago on 4 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of world snooker champions#RfC: Should player highlighting indicate whether a player has "competed" or is "active"? (Initiated 2965 days ago on 3 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Falklands War#RFC:Inclusion of material related to Norwegian listening station (Initiated 2944 days ago on 24 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Request DYK topic ban (Initiated 2913 days ago on 24 June 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Grange, Broadhembury#Request for comment made (Initiated 2956 days ago on 12 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Common law#Request for comment on "three connotations" (Initiated 2941 days ago on 27 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Username policy#RfC: Is it time to relax a bit on WP:NOSHARE? (Initiated 2969 days ago on 29 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Korea-related articles#RfC: Which romanization system should be used for pre-division Korean topics? (Initiated 2965 days ago on 3 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Time (Electric Light Orchestra album)#RfC: Should Wiki-voice view Time as a story? Keep "Storyline"? (Initiated 2969 days ago on 29 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Please close the merge discussion of time loop and time slip into time travel in fiction. BrightRoundCircle ( talk) 12:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 2954 days ago on 14 May 2016)
I make a formal request for closure of this RfC. I believe there is consensus around the proposal made by Special:Contributions/87.162.74.84 (Initiated 2943 days ago on 25 May 2016). 79.64.199.8 ( talk) 09:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace/Archive 14#RFC: Suggestion: Visual Editor Version (Initiated 2963 days ago on 5 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 03:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Would someone (not necessarily an admin) close the RFC about a proposed draftspace deletion? (archive 128) (Initiated 2948 days ago on 20 May 2016) -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 20:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:NHL 15#Should New Features be included on NHL articles (Initiated 2950 days ago on 18 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Judith Wilyman PhD controversy/Archive 1#RFC: Reasons for not promoting a conference (Initiated 2946 days ago on 22 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Clarification of BIO1E (Initiated 2935 days ago on 2 June 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption#RfC: Grant exemptions to users in good standing on request (Initiated 2945 days ago on 23 May 2016)? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 22:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)