The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 07:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Apart from being slightly
WP:PROMO, sources consist of press releases,
WP:ROUTINE, or short mentions as a kind of middleman. Others included questionably-
WP:RELIABLE sources / cryptocurrency publications like
https://decrypt.coTLA(talk) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak delete. The various crypto publications might be OK for providing some verifiability but I'm not seeing a level of coverage that suggests that this is sufficiently notable. The connections to celebrities seem minor and notability is not inherited anyway. As always with crypto stuff, any mentions of dollar values should be taken with a substantial pinch of salt unless verified by truly Reliable Sources. Ironically, it might be more notable if it was a shadier operation, getting coverage for its shadiness, but I don't see any evidence of that. --
DanielRigal (
talk) 00:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 11:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Yahoo News reposted a Coindesk article, which is a non-RS. Funding announcements don't contribute to notability and the list of "notable events" is longer than the rest of the article. PROMO
Oaktree b (
talk) 16:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.