The result was keep. MBisanz talk 13:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC) reply
One of many property sale price listing websites listing data from HM Land Registry. Insufficient independent in-depth sources, consequently, fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) -- John ( Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 19:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
It struck me as odd that this company has a WP article, whilst others offering the same service, don't. It looks to me as if WP is being used for commercial publicity. -- John ( Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 18:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep - obviously. It's a highly popular website in the UK, I've even heard people using the verb "to zoopla" their neighbours. Highly relevant site, often quoted in the media, and in any houseseeker's bookmarks. Lists houses sold in every street in the UK, over the past decade or so, and how much it sold for. A very relevant site. I think we should also consider creating a page for houseprices.co.uk while we're at it... Tris2000 ( talk) 16:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep As the author, I would obviously say this - but think it is justified by all the comments above. This is my first full article, I wrote it as I like the site and think it is unique and interesting particularly because of the 'wisdom of the crowds' angle - Zoopla is different from houseprices.co.uk and the other static pricing websites people have mentioned because of the ugc elements and because it calculates current valuation estimates. It appears to be large, fast-growing and noteworthy. In writing the article, I also came across other references in noteworthy publications like The Guardian. If there are improvements to be made to references etc, would be delighted for folks to contribute to making these and helping my humble and stumbling efforts to improve the entry. Moneybagsuk ( talk) 21:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC) reply