The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Zepto

Zepto (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. References are routine coverage. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep ^Talk 14:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Keep added third-party reliable sources for India's 84th unicorn.-- Curvasingh ( talk) 02:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete Agree with the source analysis given. Nothing we can use for notability, I can't find much else to use either. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

This is about the only non-PR source I can find, and it's fluff [1]. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

• Comment Lets examine the references:

• Ref 1 [2] Monthly sales double. Press-release. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
• Ref 2 [3] X of Y article. Attractive place to work. Not independent. Fails WP:ORGIND.
• Ref 3 [4] Raised 100m. Fails [[WP:CORPDEPTH]. Taken straight from the company blog.
• Ref 4 [5] Raises 200million. Press-release. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Monies raised.
• Ref 5 [6] Interview with the founders. Fails WP:SIRS.
• Ref 6 [7] From a press-release.
• Ref 7 [8] More monies raised.
• Ref 8 [9] Taken from a company report.

Not a single reference here passes WP:NCORP. It is all coming from the company. scope_creep ^Talk

• Delete Nothing reliable found, and 'unicorn' is an industry term no normal person will ever know with made-up criteria. Nate • ( chatter) 15:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.