The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
RedirectDelete beat me to the nom. There used to be a gold certification as evidence of notability, but as mentioned by Huon there is just no proof of that title (I even found a source from '08 that said "has sold just 14,000 copies").
Primefac (
talk) 12:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Changed !vote per cogent arguments below.
Primefac (
talk) 02:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. If determined to be non-notable, I think this article should be redirected to
Josh Todd where the subject of this article is briefly mentioned, instead of being deleted.
Deli nk (
talk) 17:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment Does being the subject of a lawsuit count towards notability?
Jasper the Friendly Punk (
talk) 22:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
No, unless that lawsuit has been the subject of significant third-party sourcing.
Primefac (
talk) 23:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect. Even if the
notability guideline for recordings can not be met - and I can't find sufficient sources - the article title is a perfectly valid search term, and there is no need for deletion. The policy-based solution per
WP:ATD-R is to redirect to the artist article
Josh Todd as a
categorized{{
R from album}}. — SamSailor 02:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Josh Todd; the artist is notable, this album is not.--
Jorm (
talk) 18:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect - as per Sam Sailor comment.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.