- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Pamzeis ( talk) 04:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
X-Cart
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- X-Cart ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Smells like covert advertising, considering that the article is basically a list of features. Primary claim to significance is "world's first PHP shopping cart software" and number of users, which are both nice but don't strike me as especially notable. There are plenty of cited sources, but they're either the company website, "best of" lists of questionable notability/independence, interviews, or passing mentions. Couldn't find the Reuters source, but I found a press release with the same title with trivial namechecking of the product (as "this same company also did..."). Best source is the "Merchant Maverick," and frankly it's not much of a source in my opinion. BEFORE gives me a ton of press releases and a few more reviews, but imo this does not demonstrate any significant change in notability since the last AfD. GeneralNotability ( talk) 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability ( talk) 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability ( talk) 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability ( talk) 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It is a poor article, but can be improved through the normal editing process. For
WP:GNG, it is not necessary for
WP:RS/
WP:IS to necessarily have been cited in the article itself...what's required is that such sources exist;
WP:BEFORE shows they do for this topic.—
Ad Meliora
Talk∕
Contribs 19:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ad Meliora, I'm well aware of what our requirements are for GNG. Since it seems that you have found sources I didn't, can you please link some of the ones you found in your BEFORE? GeneralNotability ( talk) 19:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Unlike the nom, I believe "world's first PHP shopping cart software" is notable. Of course WP:PEACOCK needs to be reined in, but the subject deserves an article. — Ad Meliora Talk∕ Contribs 19:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This article is a waste of Wikipedia space. All the sources above are terrible - press-releases, prices, mentions - they really do not show any notability; actually they just prove that the company uses Wikipedia as advertising platform and it is hardly notable. If these are all the sources, then I can't imagine how this advertising page can be improved. By the way, I recommend Ad Meliora to read this:
- /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources -- 2601:1C0:CB01:2660:D994:7507:E8C9:2764 ( talk) 05:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The article needs a little clean-up. Nonetheless, with the sources presented by Ad Meliora, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: meets WP:GNG and has number of industry publications writing about it, which can be considered peer reviews. Expertwikiguy ( talk) 04:14, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.