- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 10:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Witch Hunt (Rush song)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Witch Hunt (Rush song) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable album track, did not chart, did not achieve widespread fame. Sources talk about it only in passing, as part of a concert or album review. Fails WP:NSONG. (Note that this article is part of larger effort by User:Danieleb82 to put all of Rush's songs into the encyclopedia, using sockpuppets to evade his ban. The sockpuppet User:Buttletsaregone created the page.) Binksternet ( talk) 23:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Binksternet ( talk) 23:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping to Drmies who developed the article into its present form. Binksternet ( talk) 23:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, also on behalf of the 2,400 people who saw this at DYK. Also, there's coverage and stuff. Come on now Binksternet. Drmies ( talk) 00:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - I am not prepared to !vote yet, but the material about the song in Rush and Philosophy is more than passing mentions and certainly not as part of an album (or concert) review. Rlendog ( talk) 15:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - The material in Rush and Philosophy and Rush FAQ is certainly more than passing mentions and not an album review. With that plus the other coverage in the article, which is admittedly less substantial, this meets NSONG. Rlendog ( talk) 15:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.