- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak per WP:G11. North America 1000 09:50, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
WeddingZ.in
- WeddingZ.in ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All the refs appear to be press releases or advertisements. Article is highly promotional and I can see no evidence of notability. The number of references (28 quoted but actually 14) appears to be intended to intimidate reviewers Velella Velella Talk 12:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable at this time; not seeing WP:CORPDEPTH in independent coverage; agree, reads like a press release for PR. Kierzek ( talk) 12:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 16:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 16:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 17:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO -- entirely an advertorial. Coverage that I see are trivial, PR or PR like, and insufficient to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.