From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 13:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Veterans League of Joint Council of Municipalities

Veterans League of Joint Council of Municipalities (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable soccer (football) league. The article states that the league is "amateur competitive". Has been tagged with the notability tag since 2011. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 22:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Non-notable amateur football tournament. I don't see what the target article would gain by merging this content there, except maybe adding a single sentence saying the competition exists. It does. So what? It would be like listing sports clubs of Microsoft employees in the article on Microsoft corporation. Timbouctou ( talk) 13:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - no content worth merging. Giant Snowman 21:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Very low level amateur league, no real content worth merging into the geographic article. Fenix down ( talk) 17:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.