The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable company, fails
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP, also pretty
promotional Had notability and advert tag on for 5 years, time to sort it out.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 15:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. While I could find a few mentions of it in some small newspapers, nothing indicated
WP:ORGDEPTH. Agree with nom on
WP:PROMO issues. Bordwall(talk⁄ctrb) 17:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment@
Ashbeckjonathan: The two links you provide above are just links to the main pages of WikiProject Christianity and WikiProject Sports, which are not notability guideline pages. North America1000 01:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Ashbeckjonathan: So what is your basis for article deletion, besides "not notable". Did you read any of the sources I provided below? North America1000 02:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Then I'll change my vote to keep. I'll need to pay more attention next time maybe do some research perhaps.
Ashbeckjonathan (
talk) 03:01, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the reply. I have struck your initial delete !vote above, to prevent any confusion for the closer of this discussion. North America1000 03:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep – Certainly passes
WP:ORGDEPTH, having received significant independent nationwide coverage in various U.S. newspapers. Promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing the article. Source examples include, but are not limited to: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. North America1000 00:44, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 00:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep A plethora of reliable sources now found.
DavidLeighEllis (
talk) 17:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.