The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. The creator claims that the information comes from the main article on Lopez, so it should be deleted there as well, unless it is properly referenced. Blanchardb-Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed 15:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete - agree per above mentioned rule. --
GPPandetalk! 19:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is almost entirely
crystal balling. But aside from that, there's no reason to have verifiable, notable future projects be separate from the main
Jennifer Lopez article. --
Amwestover (
talk|
contrib) 21:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete. This one lost me with the first words "This great information comes from...".
WP:NOT a fansite. If there's anything listed here that is sourceable, maybe merge that info into the main article. But I bet most of it's there already. This possibly could have been speedied based on how it was written.
23skidoo (
talk) 17:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.