From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to University of the Philippines Diliman. MBisanz talk 00:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

University of the Philippines College of Music

University of the Philippines College of Music (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some of this article was apparently copied and pasted from here, I've revision deleted the suspect material for now pending the outcome of this afd, which seeks to establish whether the University should remain on Wikipedia. TomStar81 ( Talk) 08:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor Talk! 12:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor Talk! 12:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The University is, I believe, notable, but not this particular college which is only a subunit. WP:BRANCH lays it out pretty clearly. KDS4444 ( talk) 21:31, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: KDS4444 has said it all – universities are usually notable, but departments within a university rarely are. And this one, completely unsourced, definitely isn't. Richard3120 ( talk) 21:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular ( talk) 18:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:BRANCH, although the content (with a source) could be merged into the main article. Blythwood ( talk) 21:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Merge/Redirect as usual in such cases. There's enough to merge, if we properly rewrite some material added as copyvio from official site. DGG ( talk ) 22:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.