From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to APO Hiking Society. plicit 06:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Tuloy Na Tuloy Pa Rin ang Pasko

Tuloy Na Tuloy Pa Rin ang Pasko (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG, and per previous discussions Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andito Tayo Para sa Isa't Isa and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Shines (2019 song). Chompy Ace 06:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Philippines. Chompy Ace 06:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Passes WP:NSONG, even the fourth and last source. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 07:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    Plus the first since talks about APO Hiking. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 07:04, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to APO Hiking Society as an alternative to deletion. — hueman1 ( talk contributions) 11:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to APO Hiking Society as an WP:ATD. Five sources were presented as a quantity in the page, but the quality is not on an article-worthy level. CruzRamiss2002 ( talk) 14:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply
     Comment: @ CruzRamiss2002: I don't understand. The 1st, 4th and the 5th sources mentions the song, I think the 4rt and 5th may pass NSONG under the rule Has been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups., why?, because it mentions the cover version of Ben&Ben. I am not an expert on how Wikipedia rules work, I am just participating and I have no idea if it will pass or not. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 10:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    First of all, read the last part carefully, "Quantity over quality"; almost seemingly passes the Wikipedia criteria of standards, but it doesn't sufficient enough to fit as a standalone article (it should always be "Quality over equal to but not equal to quantity"). And lastly for my advice to your last statement, if you don't know or understand anything, highly suggested to don't do anything until you have an idea about reading the WP:RULES. CruzRamiss2002 ( talk) 14:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to APO Hiking Society. Fails WP:NSONG per nom. SBKSPP ( talk) 05:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.