The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 19:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Articles on this band have been speedy deleted on several occasions and another was deleted after an AfD in early 2011. I can't determine whether this article simply duplicates earlier versions, and it's been nearly two years, so I decided to bring it here. The reviews in the article do not seem reliable in terms of establishing notability, and I found no significant coverage in GNews or elsewhere for this band; just an official website and social networking sites (YouTube, Facebook, MySpace, last.fm, etc). Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 20:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC) reply
No apparent reason to delete. I believe that there seems to be no reason to delete this page. There are numerous pages present on Wikipedia which have little to no valid referencing, and viewing the references from this page it seems that the important ones are not just referencing the band's own site. Reviews have been written by people who work for actual music review sites, which to me seems a valid reason for keeping the page. If they're working hard and whoever wrote it isn't trying to break any rules, then it should stay. The fact that they have an album too, which seems to have had work put into it from people other than just themselves, to me, seems to mean that it isn't a run-of-the-mill group who are just trying to conjure up publicity. (I don't quite know how to get IP on here as I don't have a username). 15:38, 14 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.55.34 ( talk)
Delete - This article simply does not appear to assert the subject's importance as outlined by WP:MUSICBIO. -- WikHead ( talk) 23:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC) reply
No apparent reason to delete Just another example of wikipedia moderators trying to exercise their power for little to no reason. Moronic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.238.122 ( talk) 22:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC) reply