The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 07:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Reads like an ad, non-notable, significant portions lifted from press release, arguably a copyright violation. —METS501 (
talk) 02:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete to deal with copyvio then redirect to the artist unless signficant independent coverage can be found (I didn't see any with a google search).
Polarpanda (
talk) 14:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. Copyvio issues and notability issues.
Annette46 (
talk) 15:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.