The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom - fails
WP:GNG. No need to redirect, as we are talking of a subject that is clearly non-notable, with no media coverage, and hardly being researched for in Wikipedia. --
Angelo (
talk) 22:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: No independent, reliable sourcing of this stub. No evidence of notability. No suggestion that his level of play meets any extant notability criteria. A
reliable source must be independent, AND reliable, AND provide
significant coverage TO the subject in order to meet the GNG's standards.
Ravenswing 21:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.