The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment I think it's been a little quickly judged here. If those websites like BBC and others are used, citations are collected from those news sites. Well I see enough information on the web for Waywell to actually pass on the
WP:BIO side of things.
Govvy (
talk) 20:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete. He certainly fails WP:ATHLETE, no doubt about that. And whilst there may be a bit of news coverage, what I've found so far only seems to be of the bog standard someone-commenting-on-something variety. He hasn't really done anything of note in the world of football (or any other world for that matter) for him to pass WP:N.
Bettia(rawr!) 11:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 22:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment Waywell's sole notability according to the article is as a football manager. The article must therefore stand or fall according to sports-related criteria. If one deleted all the football material, ther would be virtually nothign left, so that judging him according to general bio-criteria will not do. Apart from football he is clearly NN, I do not know enough of football to comment on that, so No vote.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 18:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable manager coaching a non-notable club.
Hubschrauber729 (
talk) 03:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 19:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.