The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep . ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Spume Island

Spume Island (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google Books returns only 14 hits, none of which appear to discuss this location in any depth. This island does not appear to qualify as notable by the terms of WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Also see Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability. KDS4444 ( talk) 07:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Castles and islands simply are notable. And it is even apparently named by the United Kingdom Antarctic Place-names Committee. -- do ncr am 18:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep Per WP:GEOLAND. Smartyllama ( talk) 03:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.