The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply
This article is probably just spam, but I thought it was worth more than a speedy delete - they company is just another non-notable search engine, but they do have a small measure of notoriety for they unethical behaviour and mass spamming ( http://www.google.com/search?q=spokeo+spam). Unfortunately their spamming extends to Wikipedia; pretty much the entire article is written by Spokeo registered IPs or accounts created just for this article, and includes careful citations to a previous version of their product (the current version just attempts to harvest people's address books, using positive reviews of the previous version as a kind of bait-and-switch). If there is anything worth saving here, I think a ground-up rewrite would be required. akaDruid ( talk) 14:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC) reply