From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 18:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Sihanart Suttisak

Sihanart Suttisak (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed, Article seems to fails both WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG, no citations added. Govvy ( talk) 16:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Govvy ( talk) 16:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nomination. I would note this is one of about 100 similar articles from the same editor, possibly all AfD candidates. -- John B123 ( talk) 16:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 16:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:20, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • There may be sources worth scrutinising, but given the state of the article and the context of its creation, delete without prejudice to creation of a proper article where the author can be bothered to actually remove irrelevant text mindlessly copied from other articles. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 20:55, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply

*Delete WP:GNG fail with no sourcing. Alpateya ( talk) 19:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Alpateya is a blocked sock for User:Dorama285. 7&6=thirteen ( ) 13:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.