From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to League1 Ontario. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Sigma FC

Sigma FC (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and other notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 01:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to League1 Ontario, likely search term but not independently notable. Giant Snowman 15:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - meets WP:GNG with signficant nedia coverage such as [1] [2] Nfitz ( talk) 18:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to League1 Ontario, likely search term but not independently notable. Of the two sources noted by Nfitz above, the first, although it has Sigma in the article title is more heavily focussed on the overall Canadian soccer scene in general, although if more similar articles could be shown then I can see that this could be a notable team through GNG. The second source though is just routine transfer reporting, the sort of which long standing consensus exists stating that this does not count toward notability. Either way, this source is about two players who played for the club not the club itself. Fenix down ( talk) 13:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Not sure exactly how to add to this convo, but there are a few other teams in League1 Ontario that have their own articles, like Durham United FC, the Windsor Stars, and Toronto FC Academy. Vince193 ( talk) 14:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC) reply
    • If they are notable, they should have articles. If they're not, they shouldn't. As it stands Durham United is also being discussed for deletion while Windsor and TFC Academy have a number of news articles and so meet notability criteria. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 15:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.