The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Questionable notability, lack of reliable secondary sources and article comes across as somewhat vanity.
Mansheimer (
talk) 16:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete not enough reliable, indepdent 3rd-party sources to show notability. Interviews do not add toward passing this threshold.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 16:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:V. If her following's "underground cult" it must be way underground. She has no social media presence: zero Wheatons, LinkedIn.
Bearian (
talk) 16:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.