From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Sex at Oxbridge

Sex at Oxbridge (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing significant in WP:RS. Just trivial coverage in tabloid sites. Fails WP:NWEB. Störm (talk) 18:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Upon reflection, I can see the blog seems to be no longer active - and weak references. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 07:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The sources check out on the Telegraph and the Mail. The Sun no longer has it on its website, but two out of three sources with the subject as its main focus begrudgingly makes it notable enough for me. Ifnord ( talk) 23:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 06:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 06:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 06:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Spam for a blog, created in 2010 and then mostly forgotten, weak references. Doesn't pass gng. Szzuk ( talk) 22:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • delete this is a one and done article -- it got headlines in 2010 and has been devoid of sources since ... while notability is not temporary, Wikipedia is also not a newspaper Burley22 ( talk) 01:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, per above - fails WP:RS, orphaned. fish& karate 12:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.