The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nothing significant in
WP:RS. Just trivial coverage in tabloid sites. Fails
WP:NWEB.
Störm(talk) 18:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Upon reflection, I can see the blog seems to be no longer active - and weak references.
Deathlibrarian (
talk) 07:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. The sources check out on the Telegraph and the Mail. The Sun no longer has it on its website, but two out of three sources with the subject as its main focus begrudgingly makes it notable enough for me.
Ifnord (
talk) 23:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Spam for a blog, created in 2010 and then mostly forgotten, weak references. Doesn't pass gng.
Szzuk (
talk) 22:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)reply
delete this is a one and done article -- it got headlines in 2010 and has been devoid of sources since ... while notability is not temporary, Wikipedia is also not a newspaper
Burley22 (
talk) 01:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete, per above - fails
WP:RS, orphaned.
fish&
karate 12:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.