The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)reply
I've added some more references now. Unless I've mistaken the reliability of some of the sources, I still believe that it meets the general notability guideline.--SkyGazer 512Oh no, what did I do this time? 15:44, 26 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete nfooty is too inclusive as it is, people who do not meet it and are only known in connection with football should never have articles.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 05:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete, does not meet BASIC/GNG; NFOOTY is not met either, but is not a prescriptive inclusion criterion anyway. SamSailor 09:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:NFOOTY and I think the coverage is too routine to meet
WP:GNG.
Papaursa (
talk) 01:55, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. Clearly meets the
WP:GNG. Coverage is not at all routine as it includes discussions to include Osigwe in the Nigerian national team. Why would that be routine?
SkyGazer 512 summarized the situation well.
gidonb (
talk) 18:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Bejnar: Unless I'm missing something, this is the only time Gidonb !voted in this AfD. The two users who !voted to keep were me (SkyGazer 512) and Gidonb.--SkyGazer 512Oh no, what did I do this time? 01:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete I was wavering between keep and delete but both JohnPackLambert and Paparusa's vote rationals put me here. Sebastian Osigwe doesn't meet WP:Footy and the coverage for him to meet WP:GNG isn't enough to justify keeping the article since he so clearly fails WP:Footy. Maybe in the future if he does something outside of football the article can be recreated but right now it's a delete for me.
JC7V-constructive zone 02:21, 30 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.