The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)reply
He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails
WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails
WP:GNG.
Simione001 (
talk) 11:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete As per nom. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. DerbyCountyinNZ (
TalkContribs) 12:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails
WP:NSPORT and
WP:GNG.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 14:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 06:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - The lot of a 3rd string keeper is poor one, if everyone else remains healthy. This player is borderline in so many ways. With a big team, but hasn't started. Lots of U20 play and coverage, but that doesn't count. Was with the New Zealand Olympic Team in London 2010, but wasn't even with the game squad. Lots of news coverage, but mostly routine. However I think he does meet
WP:GNG with the media coverage of his Olympic spot, such as
[1][2][3], and some other articles such as
[4][5] ... and he has a lot of the routine coverage, that doesn't quite meet
WP:GNGNfitz (
talk) 17:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NFOOTBALL. The links above do not to my mind establish GNG.
The first is an interview and could form part of a GNG claim, but is insufficient on its own.
the second is just a pen pic which every player who competed had on the BBC website, no depth whatsoever,
the third is another brief-ish interview, but the source states that it is courtesy of the NZ football federation, so not really an independant source.
The fourth mentions Basalaj in the title line but is more of a general article. Finally,
the last link is to
WP:ROUTINE transfer speculation.
Fenix down (
talk) 11:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
That was only a sampling, there's plenty of other articles
[6][7][8][9]. There's a lot of coverage over a period of time in a variety sources. Some is a little routine ... but it's hardly a local paper reporting about a local team.
Nfitz (
talk) 03:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.