- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Satisfy (typeface)
- Satisfy (typeface) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A free font available on some font repository websites. I have not been able to find any evidence that this font has been the subject of book or news coverage, or extensive coverage on websites dedicated to writing articles about fonts. There are websites that display it, not surprisingly since it's free, and MyFonts sells an expanded version, but no descriptive coverage or suggestion that it is special or notable. Blythwood ( talk) 20:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 ( talk) 20:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Morphenniel ( talk) 18:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete it is even cloned and from cloning direct to Wikipedia without independent secondary sources coverage. No evidence this has received any media attention and thus fails WP:GNG comoletely – Ammarpad ( talk) 19:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.