The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Sarena Special

Sarena Special (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable racehorse. Has no wins of significance in any major race and fails general notability guidline Bcp67 ( talk) 20:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. None of this horse's successes or near successes appear to have been in major races, all being in maiden and selling races, and I can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. In fact the racing record seems to be just as lacking in notability as my daughter's horse, a thoroughbred former racehorse. 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 22:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.