The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sources brought up during this discussion have been found to either be primary or to refer to a different company with the same name. Thank you for your careful review. LizRead!Talk! 22:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)reply
One of the worst articles I've ever come across, previous AfD was a farce. Zero secondary sources. No evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources per
WP:ORGCRIT.
AusLondonder (
talk) 16:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Karl Twist: I have just been looking at the sources you have provided. The first source is about
Saga Petroleum, a Norwegian company of the same name. The second source appears to be a classified advertisement placed by a government official, which does not establish notability. The third source is a letter from a government department, obviously doesn't assist. The next source is a primary source, a legal case not even directly involving Saga Petroleum LLC. The final source is again about the unrelated Norwegian company.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. Article needs a great amount of improving.
Karl Twist (
talk)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete can't find anything that suggests notability, fails
WP:CORP --Devokewater 22:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.