The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep / nom withdrawn. Clearly my BEFORE was broken. StarMississippi 00:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
This is a long standing company, but outside of
this source about whose standing as a reliable source I'm unclear, I'm unable to find anything to meet the depth required for WP:ORG. In the article and a BEFORE revealed run of the mill announcements to be expected of a 75 year old company/ StarMississippi 20:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Home Theater Review is a perfectly respectable source. The question is whether sources exist, not whether they are available online.
Rathfelder (
talk) 23:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I also agree that
Home Theare Review is a good in-depth article. I found 3 more citations in Google Books and have added them.
MartinWilder (
talk) 03:03, 25 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. they probably are notable as developers of a very important standard in the field DGG (
talk ) 05:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep enough citations was provided by above voters.
Brayan ocaner (
talk) 00:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.