- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 08:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Rulers.org
- Rulers.org ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly just advertising as it ha no outside reference other than an apparent tertiary source in the link. No notability therefore indicated. Lihaas ( talk) 14:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (websites). We are not a catalog of webpages. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 16:57, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 16:57, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:WEB and WP:OR. Per nominator, purely an advertisement.-- Ddcm8991 ( talk) 19:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Hardly notable or circulated enough to have a page. Capitals00 ( talk) 05:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as none of this currently suggests a better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.